Linux ARM-MSM sub-architecture
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Antonino Maniscalco <antomani103@gmail.com>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
	Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
	Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] drm/msm/A6xx: Use posamble to reset counters on preemption
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 15:38:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b899d35a-fedf-4748-ac23-6389a8742160@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF6AEGv82=N4=motCpGhp5N7Yv8oqtBcG4bGahgF53CpFYpTgg@mail.gmail.com>

On 8/30/24 8:32 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 8:33 AM Antonino Maniscalco
> <antomani103@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Use the postamble to reset perf counters when switching between rings,
>> except when sysprof is enabled, analogously to how they are reset
>> between submissions when switching pagetables.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Antonino Maniscalco <antomani103@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c     | 14 +++++++++++++-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h     |  6 ++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h   |  7 +++++--
>>   4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
>> index 1a90db5759b8..3528ecbbc1ab 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
>> @@ -366,7 +366,8 @@ static void a6xx_submit(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct msm_gem_submit *submit)
>>   static void a6xx_emit_set_pseudo_reg(struct msm_ringbuffer *ring,
>>                  struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct msm_gpu_submitqueue *queue)
>>   {
>> -       u64 preempt_offset_priv_secure;
>> +       bool sysprof = refcount_read(&a6xx_gpu->base.base.sysprof_active) > 1;
>> +       u64 preempt_offset_priv_secure, preempt_postamble;
>>
>>          OUT_PKT7(ring, CP_SET_PSEUDO_REG, 15);
>>
>> @@ -403,6 +404,17 @@ static void a6xx_emit_set_pseudo_reg(struct msm_ringbuffer *ring,
>>          /* seems OK to set to 0 to disable it */
>>          OUT_RING(ring, 0);
>>          OUT_RING(ring, 0);
>> +
>> +       if (!sysprof && a6xx_gpu->preempt_postamble_len) {
>> +               preempt_postamble = SCRATCH_PREEMPT_POSTAMBLE_IOVA(a6xx_gpu);
>> +
>> +               OUT_PKT7(ring, CP_SET_AMBLE, 3);
>> +               OUT_RING(ring, lower_32_bits(preempt_postamble));
>> +               OUT_RING(ring, upper_32_bits(preempt_postamble));
>> +               OUT_RING(ring, CP_SET_AMBLE_2_DWORDS(
>> +                                       a6xx_gpu->preempt_postamble_len) |
>> +                               CP_SET_AMBLE_2_TYPE(KMD_AMBLE_TYPE));
>> +       }
> 
> Hmm, ok, we set this in the submit path.. but do we need to clear it
> somehow when transitioning from !sysprof to sysprof?
> 

We can always emit the packet and 0 fields out when sysprof is enabled. 
Would that be ok for you? Only emitting it when needed might be 
nontrivial given that there are multiple rings and we would be paying 
the overhead for emitting it in the more common case (not profiling) anyway.

> Also, how does this interact with UMD perfctr queries, I would expect
> they would prefer save/restore?

Right so my understanding given previous discussions is that we want to 
disable preemption from userspace in that case? The vulkan extension 
requires to acquire and release a lock so we could use that to emit the 
packets that enable and disable preemption perhaps.

> 
> BR,
> -R
> 
>>   }
>>
>>   static void a7xx_submit(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct msm_gem_submit *submit)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h
>> index 652e49f01428..2338e36c8f47 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h
>> @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ struct a6xx_gpu {
>>          atomic_t preempt_state;
>>          spinlock_t eval_lock;
>>          struct timer_list preempt_timer;
>> +       uint64_t preempt_postamble_len;
>>
>>          unsigned int preempt_level;
>>          bool uses_gmem;
>> @@ -99,6 +100,11 @@ struct a6xx_gpu {
>>   #define SCRATCH_USER_CTX_IOVA(ring_id, a6xx_gpu) \
>>          (a6xx_gpu->scratch_iova + (ring_id * sizeof(uint64_t)))
>>
>> +#define SCRATCH_PREEMPT_POSTAMBLE_OFFSET (100 * sizeof(u64))
>> +
>> +#define SCRATCH_PREEMPT_POSTAMBLE_IOVA(a6xx_gpu) \
>> +       (a6xx_gpu->scratch_iova + SCRATCH_PREEMPT_POSTAMBLE_OFFSET)
>> +
>>   /*
>>    * In order to do lockless preemption we use a simple state machine to progress
>>    * through the process.
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c
>> index 4b61b993f75f..f586615db97e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c
>> @@ -351,6 +351,28 @@ static int preempt_init_ring(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu,
>>          return 0;
>>   }
>>
>> +static void preempt_prepare_postamble(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu)
>> +{
>> +       u32 *postamble = a6xx_gpu->scratch_ptr + SCRATCH_PREEMPT_POSTAMBLE_OFFSET;
>> +       u32 count = 0;
>> +
>> +       postamble[count++] = PKT7(CP_REG_RMW, 3);
>> +       postamble[count++] = REG_A6XX_RBBM_PERFCTR_SRAM_INIT_CMD;
>> +       postamble[count++] = 0;
>> +       postamble[count++] = 1;
>> +
>> +       postamble[count++] = PKT7(CP_WAIT_REG_MEM, 6);
>> +       postamble[count++] = CP_WAIT_REG_MEM_0_FUNCTION(WRITE_EQ);
>> +       postamble[count++] = CP_WAIT_REG_MEM_1_POLL_ADDR_LO(
>> +                               REG_A6XX_RBBM_PERFCTR_SRAM_INIT_STATUS);
>> +       postamble[count++] = CP_WAIT_REG_MEM_2_POLL_ADDR_HI(0);
>> +       postamble[count++] = CP_WAIT_REG_MEM_3_REF(0x1);
>> +       postamble[count++] = CP_WAIT_REG_MEM_4_MASK(0x1);
>> +       postamble[count++] = CP_WAIT_REG_MEM_5_DELAY_LOOP_CYCLES(0);
>> +
>> +       a6xx_gpu->preempt_postamble_len = count;
>> +}
>> +
>>   void a6xx_preempt_fini(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>   {
>>          struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
>> @@ -382,10 +404,12 @@ void a6xx_preempt_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>          a6xx_gpu->skip_save_restore = 1;
>>
>>          a6xx_gpu->scratch_ptr  = msm_gem_kernel_new(gpu->dev,
>> -                       gpu->nr_rings * sizeof(uint64_t), MSM_BO_WC,
>> +                       PAGE_SIZE, MSM_BO_WC,
>>                          gpu->aspace, &a6xx_gpu->scratch_bo,
>>                          &a6xx_gpu->scratch_iova);
>>
>> +       preempt_prepare_postamble(a6xx_gpu);
>> +
>>          if (IS_ERR(a6xx_gpu->scratch_ptr))
>>                  goto fail;
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
>> index 6b1888280a83..87098567483b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
>> @@ -610,12 +610,15 @@ OUT_PKT4(struct msm_ringbuffer *ring, uint16_t regindx, uint16_t cnt)
>>          OUT_RING(ring, PKT4(regindx, cnt));
>>   }
>>
>> +#define PKT7(opcode, cnt) \
>> +       (CP_TYPE7_PKT | (cnt << 0) | (PM4_PARITY(cnt) << 15) | \
>> +               ((opcode & 0x7F) << 16) | (PM4_PARITY(opcode) << 23))
>> +
>>   static inline void
>>   OUT_PKT7(struct msm_ringbuffer *ring, uint8_t opcode, uint16_t cnt)
>>   {
>>          adreno_wait_ring(ring, cnt + 1);
>> -       OUT_RING(ring, CP_TYPE7_PKT | (cnt << 0) | (PM4_PARITY(cnt) << 15) |
>> -               ((opcode & 0x7F) << 16) | (PM4_PARITY(opcode) << 23));
>> +       OUT_RING(ring, PKT7(opcode, cnt));
>>   }
>>
>>   struct msm_gpu *a2xx_gpu_init(struct drm_device *dev);
>>
>> --
>> 2.46.0
>>

Best regards,
-- 
Antonino Maniscalco <antomani103@gmail.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-04 13:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-30 15:32 [PATCH v2 0/9] Preemption support for A7XX Antonino Maniscalco
2024-08-30 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] drm/msm: Fix bv_fence being used as bv_rptr Antonino Maniscalco
2024-08-30 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] drm/msm: Add submitqueue setup and close Antonino Maniscalco
2024-08-30 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] drm/msm: Add a `preempt_record_size` field Antonino Maniscalco
2024-08-30 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] drm/msm/A6xx: Implement preemption for A7XX targets Antonino Maniscalco
2024-08-30 18:01   ` Rob Clark
2024-08-30 18:54     ` Connor Abbott
2024-08-30 19:00       ` Rob Clark
2024-08-30 19:09         ` Connor Abbott
2024-08-30 20:19           ` Rob Clark
2024-08-30 20:25   ` Rob Clark
2024-08-31 14:26     ` Antonino Maniscalco
2024-08-30 20:36   ` Rob Clark
2024-08-30 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] drm/msm/A6xx: Sync relevant adreno_pm4.xml changes Antonino Maniscalco
2024-08-30 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] drm/msm/A6xx: Use posamble to reset counters on preemption Antonino Maniscalco
2024-08-30 18:32   ` Rob Clark
2024-09-04 13:38     ` Antonino Maniscalco [this message]
2024-09-04 14:30       ` Rob Clark
2024-08-30 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] drm/msm/A6xx: Add traces for preemption Antonino Maniscalco
2024-08-30 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] drm/msm/A6XX: Add a flag to allow preemption to submitqueue_create Antonino Maniscalco
2024-08-30 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] drm/msm/A6xx: Enable preemption for A750 Antonino Maniscalco
2024-08-30 18:23   ` Rob Clark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b899d35a-fedf-4748-ac23-6389a8742160@gmail.com \
    --to=antomani103@gmail.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=sean@poorly.run \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox