Re: audit 1.2.2 released

[James Antill <jantill@redhat.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1037 bytes --]

On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 14:44 -0500, Michael C Thompson wrote:
> Linda Knippers wrote:
> > I'm running the .27 kernel and the 1.2.2 tools on an x86_64
> > (Xeon/EM64T) SMP box with the targeted policy in enforcing mode.
> > I tried to reproduce the problem discussed yesterday (the very fist
> > rule doesn't take and the rest do) but it seems to work fine on my
> > system.
> 
> I've been running mostly on an i686 (Intel) with the .27 kernel and 
> 1.2.2 tools with the MLS policy. I've tested this on an x86_64 (AMD 
> opteron) and see this problem too. However, this problem does NOT exist 
> when using targeted policy, so it is most likely an MLS SELinux issue.
> My MLS policy is 2.2.42

 I've recently hit the same issue (or one that looks just like it[1]) on
current FC-5 with targeted policy in permissive mode.

[1] Program calls audit_log_user_message() at boot time, and gets -1
(EPERM) ... if you put a "for (int i = 1; i < 1; ++i)" in front of it,
it returns 0.

-- 
James Antill <jantill@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 191 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]