Linux-audit Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael C Thompson <thompsmc@us.ibm.com>
To: Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@hp.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: audit 1.2.2 released
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 14:44:50 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4474B7B2.6030601@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44739521.7080602@hp.com>

Linda Knippers wrote:
> I'm running the .27 kernel and the 1.2.2 tools on an x86_64
> (Xeon/EM64T) SMP box with the targeted policy in enforcing mode.
> I tried to reproduce the problem discussed yesterday (the very fist
> rule doesn't take and the rest do) but it seems to work fine on my
> system.

I've been running mostly on an i686 (Intel) with the .27 kernel and 
1.2.2 tools with the MLS policy. I've tested this on an x86_64 (AMD 
opteron) and see this problem too. However, this problem does NOT exist 
when using targeted policy, so it is most likely an MLS SELinux issue.
My MLS policy is 2.2.42

> Can you describe more about your configuration and provide exact steps
> to reproduce the problem?

1) Reboot your system (so you've a clean slate)
2) Login (tty or pty, doesn't matter, I've done both)
3) auditctl -l
Error sending rule list request (Operation not permitted)
4) auditctl -l
No rules (or whatever you expect to see)

 > If you and Loulwa are seeing it but George
> (at least not on ppc64) and I aren't, there's got to be something
> different about what we're doing or what we're doing it on.

Loulwa sees this problem (I used her x86_64 machine above) and I have 
just seen this problem on George's machine (he was originally not using 
the MLS policy).

Therefore, this evidence leads me to believe its an issue in the MLS 
policy, although I do not what the problem is.

Thanks,
Mike

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-24 19:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-12 21:26 audit 1.2.2 released Steve Grubb
2006-05-15 19:57 ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-15 20:04   ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-15 20:14     ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-16 14:53       ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-16 15:23         ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-16 16:08           ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-16 16:28             ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-16 15:34         ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-16 15:53           ` Linda Knippers
2006-05-16 17:23             ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-16 20:38               ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-16 21:49                 ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-16 22:31                   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-05-17 10:25                     ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-22 17:31               ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-22 19:15                 ` Xin Zhao
2006-05-22 19:24                   ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-22 19:37                     ` Xin Zhao
2006-05-22 19:47                       ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-22 20:15                         ` Xin Zhao
2006-05-23  6:56                       ` Amy Griffis
2006-05-23  3:43                         ` Xin Zhao
2006-05-23 15:11                           ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-23 16:24                 ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-23 22:20                   ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-23 23:05                     ` Linda Knippers
2006-05-24 19:44                       ` Michael C Thompson [this message]
2006-05-24 20:58                         ` James Antill
2006-05-25 13:48                           ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-25 15:16                             ` James Antill
2006-05-25 15:22                               ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-25 15:40                                 ` James Antill
2006-05-24 13:04                     ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-24 20:30                       ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-17 15:32 ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-17 15:45   ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-17 21:12 ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-17 21:23   ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-17 21:43     ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-17 21:55       ` Steve Grubb
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-25 15:50 Chad Hanson
2006-05-26 16:05 ` Darrel Goeddel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4474B7B2.6030601@us.ibm.com \
    --to=thompsmc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linda.knippers@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox