public inbox for linux-audit@redhat.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
To: LC Bruzenak <lenny@magitekltd.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] audit: log join and part events to the read-only multicast log socket
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:08:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1919994.kBtqGod6UL@sifl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54490E85.6020403@magitekltd.com>

On Thursday, October 23, 2014 09:19:49 AM LC Bruzenak wrote:
> On 10/22/2014 04:29 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > Well, like I said, It's probably safer that way as the code will work
> > regardless.  Time to break bad habits :)
> 
> I hear you. But there's working and there's working well.
> As long as we don't suffer a search response degradation by changing the
> assumptive order, as I said, I'm OK with going back and reworking code.
> If it makes searching real data unusable, it's now broken some
> operational stuff.

Performance is a big deal, I think we've all been hearing that for some time 
now.  I get it, and it is something that is and will remain *a* priority.  
However, this fixed ordering is something that is Just Plain Wrong and is 
likely to make life much more difficult for us as we try to improve audit.

-- 
paul moore
security and virtualization @ redhat

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-23 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-07 18:23 [RFC][PATCH] audit: log join and part events to the read-only multicast log socket Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-07 19:03 ` Eric Paris
2014-10-07 19:39   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-07 22:06     ` Paul Moore
2014-10-11 15:42       ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-11 20:00         ` Paul Moore
2014-10-21 16:41     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-21 19:56   ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-21 21:08     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-21 21:40       ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-29 20:23         ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-21 22:30       ` Eric Paris
2014-10-21 23:14         ` Paul Moore
2014-10-22  1:18         ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-22 14:30         ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-21 22:30     ` Paul Moore
2014-10-22  1:24       ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-22 13:34         ` Paul Moore
2014-10-29 21:09           ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-22 14:34         ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-22 14:25       ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-22 14:30         ` Eric Paris
2014-10-22 14:36           ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-22 15:08             ` Eric Paris
2014-10-22 15:12         ` Eric Paris
2014-10-22 15:51           ` LC Bruzenak
2014-10-22 16:24             ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-22 18:18             ` Eric Paris
2014-10-22 19:36               ` LC Bruzenak
2014-10-22 20:00               ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-22 15:28         ` Paul Moore
2014-10-22 17:56           ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-22 20:06             ` Paul Moore
2014-10-22 20:34               ` LC Bruzenak
2014-10-22 20:44                 ` Paul Moore
2014-10-22 21:11                   ` LC Bruzenak
2014-10-22 21:29                     ` Paul Moore
2014-10-23 14:19                       ` LC Bruzenak
2014-10-23 19:08                         ` Paul Moore [this message]
2014-10-22 20:39               ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-22 21:00                 ` Paul Moore
2014-10-22 21:18                   ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-23 19:15                     ` Paul Moore
2014-10-30 14:55                 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-30 14:48             ` Typo in AUDIT_FEATURE_CHANGE events [was: Re: [RFC][PATCH] audit: log join and part events to the read-only multicast log socket] Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-30 15:10               ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-30 15:23                 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-29 21:38         ` [RFC][PATCH] audit: log join and part events to the read-only multicast log socket Richard Guy Briggs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1919994.kBtqGod6UL@sifl \
    --to=pmoore@redhat.com \
    --cc=lenny@magitekltd.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox