public inbox for linux-audit@redhat.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>, linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] audit: log join and part events to the read-only multicast log socket
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:36:49 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8697195.1rfEK9eruo@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1413988212.30946.71.camel@localhost>

On Wednesday, October 22, 2014 10:30:12 AM Eric Paris wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 10:25 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > 12) The struct audit_status was extended to include version and
> > backlog_wait_time. I cannot determine at runtime if they exist, meaning
> > that software compiled on a new kernel runs on an old kernel, it will be
> > reading random stack or heap to make decisions. The correct solution
> > would be to make a new struct with planned expansion capability with
> > version as the first element so any changes can be signaled. This new
> > struct would be sent using a new netlink command.
> 
> Incorrect.  The length of the message makes it perfectly clear how much
> data the kernel sent, and thus if that data includes the version or
> backlog_wait_time.  I thought this had been discussed before...
> 
> The answer is 'check how much data you got from the kernel'

Is the padding the same for all arches? :-)

-Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-22 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-07 18:23 [RFC][PATCH] audit: log join and part events to the read-only multicast log socket Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-07 19:03 ` Eric Paris
2014-10-07 19:39   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-07 22:06     ` Paul Moore
2014-10-11 15:42       ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-11 20:00         ` Paul Moore
2014-10-21 16:41     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-21 19:56   ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-21 21:08     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-21 21:40       ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-29 20:23         ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-21 22:30       ` Eric Paris
2014-10-21 23:14         ` Paul Moore
2014-10-22  1:18         ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-22 14:30         ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-21 22:30     ` Paul Moore
2014-10-22  1:24       ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-22 13:34         ` Paul Moore
2014-10-29 21:09           ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-22 14:34         ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-22 14:25       ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-22 14:30         ` Eric Paris
2014-10-22 14:36           ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2014-10-22 15:08             ` Eric Paris
2014-10-22 15:12         ` Eric Paris
2014-10-22 15:51           ` LC Bruzenak
2014-10-22 16:24             ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-22 18:18             ` Eric Paris
2014-10-22 19:36               ` LC Bruzenak
2014-10-22 20:00               ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-22 15:28         ` Paul Moore
2014-10-22 17:56           ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-22 20:06             ` Paul Moore
2014-10-22 20:34               ` LC Bruzenak
2014-10-22 20:44                 ` Paul Moore
2014-10-22 21:11                   ` LC Bruzenak
2014-10-22 21:29                     ` Paul Moore
2014-10-23 14:19                       ` LC Bruzenak
2014-10-23 19:08                         ` Paul Moore
2014-10-22 20:39               ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-22 21:00                 ` Paul Moore
2014-10-22 21:18                   ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-23 19:15                     ` Paul Moore
2014-10-30 14:55                 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-30 14:48             ` Typo in AUDIT_FEATURE_CHANGE events [was: Re: [RFC][PATCH] audit: log join and part events to the read-only multicast log socket] Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-30 15:10               ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-30 15:23                 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-29 21:38         ` [RFC][PATCH] audit: log join and part events to the read-only multicast log socket Richard Guy Briggs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8697195.1rfEK9eruo@x2 \
    --to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=rgb@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox