Re: Q on audit, audit-syscall

Re: Q on audit, audit-syscall

[Andrew Morton]

Herbert Rosmanith <kernel@wildsau.enemy.org> wrote:
>
> (2) in linux/Documentation/devices.txt I've found an "audit device":
> 
>          103 block       Audit device
>                            0 = /dev/audit        Audit device
> 

hm.  I don't think that's true, is it?  If not, can we clean
it up please?

Re: Q on audit, audit-syscall

[Steve Grubb]

On Wednesday 05 April 2006 18:37, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Herbert Rosmanith <kernel@wildsau.enemy.org> wrote:
> > (2) in linux/Documentation/devices.txt I've found an "audit device":
> >
> >          103 block       Audit device
> >                            0 = /dev/audit        Audit device
>
> hm.  I don't think that's true, is it?  If not, can we clean
> it up please?

Hi Andrew,

This looks like some Suse documentation. We've never touched the devices.txt   
file since...well...we don't use any devices. But the documentation may be 
valid since that may be what they use. You'd probably need to ask someone 
that maintains Laus if the documentation is for their audit system and 
accurate. 

If the devices file is to document only the accepted - in the 2.6 kernel.org 
kernel, then we should delete that reference. If its to document what has 
been approved, even if its proprietary, then it should be clarified that its 
Laus and not the native 2.6 kernel audit system.

Hope this helps...

-Steve