* path filter keyword and relational operators
@ 2006-05-30 19:18 Michael C Thompson
2006-05-30 19:41 ` Steve Grubb
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael C Thompson @ 2006-05-30 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steve Grubb, Linux Audit
Hey Steve,
Should the path filter keyword accept any relational operator other than
equals (=) ? It would be possible to express the other relations in
terms of the return from strcmp, but I'm not sure if that is what is
desired for this field.
Thanks,
Mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: path filter keyword and relational operators
2006-05-30 19:18 path filter keyword and relational operators Michael C Thompson
@ 2006-05-30 19:41 ` Steve Grubb
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Steve Grubb @ 2006-05-30 19:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael C Thompson; +Cc: Linux Audit
On Tuesday 30 May 2006 15:18, Michael C Thompson wrote:
> Should the path filter keyword accept any relational operator other than
> equals (=) ?
Its not likely to make sense with anything other than '='. I still consider
that area a 'work in progress' and have not attempted to constrain it. I
expect the normal interface to be the -w option and not the -F option.
-Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-05-30 19:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-05-30 19:18 path filter keyword and relational operators Michael C Thompson
2006-05-30 19:41 ` Steve Grubb
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox