* [PATCH 2/5] The error message of "-1" in field checking isnot suit
@ 2008-08-06 8:13 Zhang Xiliang
2008-08-06 19:07 ` Steve Grubb
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Zhang Xiliang @ 2008-08-06 8:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steve Grubb, Linux Audit
Hello Steve,
The error message of "-1" is "-F missing = for ...".
The opration isnot only "=".
So I think "F missing opration for" is better.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiliang <zhangxiliang@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
src/auditctl.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/auditctl.c b/src/auditctl.c
index 3958afb..a19bd14 100644
--- a/src/auditctl.c
+++ b/src/auditctl.c
@@ -747,7 +747,7 @@ static int setopt(int count, char *vars[])
audit_permadded = 1;
break;
case -1:
- fprintf(stderr, "-F missing = for %s\n",
+ fprintf(stderr, "-F missing opration for %s\n",
optarg);
retval = -1;
break;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/5] The error message of "-1" in field checking isnot suit
2008-08-06 8:13 [PATCH 2/5] The error message of "-1" in field checking isnot suit Zhang Xiliang
@ 2008-08-06 19:07 ` Steve Grubb
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Steve Grubb @ 2008-08-06 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhang Xiliang; +Cc: Linux Audit
On Wednesday 06 August 2008 04:13:01 Zhang Xiliang wrote:
> So I think "F missing opration for" is better.
I changed it to operator. Applied. Thanks for the patch !
-Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-08-06 19:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-08-06 8:13 [PATCH 2/5] The error message of "-1" in field checking isnot suit Zhang Xiliang
2008-08-06 19:07 ` Steve Grubb
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox