From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
To: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/14] audit: enable audit_get/put_mark()
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:09:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140618100931.3c2e9d38@flatline.rdu.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42425ec84afea28f141ec8ff0ef40d86246a5f32.1403060033.git.rgb@redhat.com>
Aside from the refcounting in the previous patch being bad, which you
likely didn't make any better here, I think I'm ok with
audit_put_mark/audit_get_mark being exposed and used instead of the
fsnotify_* calls being used directly...
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 23:09:49 -0400
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> wrote:
> ---
> kernel/audit.h | 2 ++
> kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 6 +++---
> kernel/auditfilter.c | 10 +++++-----
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/audit.h b/kernel/audit.h
> index 2093c5e..3151ae5 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit.h
> +++ b/kernel/audit.h
> @@ -288,6 +288,8 @@ char *audit_mark_path(struct audit_fsnotify_mark
> *mark); int audit_add_mark_rule(struct audit_krule *krule, struct
> list_head **list); void audit_remove_mark(struct audit_fsnotify_mark
> *audit_mark); int audit_mark_compare(struct audit_fsnotify_mark
> *mark, unsigned long ino, dev_t dev); +void audit_get_mark(struct
> audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark); +void audit_put_mark(struct
> audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark);
> int audit_dup_exe(struct audit_krule *new, struct audit_krule *old);
> int audit_exe_compare(struct task_struct *tsk, struct
> audit_fsnotify_mark *mark); diff --git a/kernel/audit_fsnotify.c
> b/kernel/audit_fsnotify.c index cc4175a..f5789e1 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit_fsnotify.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit_fsnotify.c
> @@ -65,14 +65,14 @@ static void audit_free_fsnotify_mark(struct
> fsnotify_mark *mark) audit_free_mark(audit_mark);
> }
>
> -#if 0 /* not sure if we need these... */
> -static void audit_get_mark(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark)
> +#if 1 /* not sure if we need these... */
> +void audit_get_mark(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark)
> {
> if (likely(audit_mark))
> fsnotify_get_mark(&audit_mark->mark);
> }
>
> -static void audit_put_mark(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark)
> +void audit_put_mark(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark)
> {
> if (likely(audit_mark))
> fsnotify_put_mark(&audit_mark->mark);
> diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> index 7b6e892..3d168ca 100644
> --- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
> +++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static inline void audit_free_rule(struct
> audit_entry *e) if (erule->watch)
> audit_put_watch(erule->watch);
> if (erule->exe)
> - fsnotify_put_mark(erule->exe->mark);
> + audit_put_mark(erule->exe);
> if (erule->fields)
> for (i = 0; i < erule->field_count; i++) {
> struct audit_field *f = &erule->fields[i];
> @@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static struct audit_entry
> *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data, err =
> PTR_ERR(audit_mark); goto exit_free;
> }
> - fsnotify_get_mark(audit_mark->mark);
> + audit_get_mark(audit_mark);
> entry->rule.exe = audit_mark;
> break;
> }
> @@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ exit_free:
> if (entry->rule.tree)
> audit_put_tree(entry->rule.tree); /* that's the
> temporary one */ if (entry->rule.exe)
> - fsnotify_put_mark(entry->rule.exe->mark); /* matches
> initial get */
> + audit_put_mark(entry->rule.exe); /* matches initial
> get */ audit_free_rule(entry);
> return ERR_PTR(err);
> }
> @@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ error:
> if (watch)
> audit_put_watch(watch); /* tmp watch, matches
> initial get */ if (exe)
> - fsnotify_put_mark(exe->mark); /* tmp mark, matches
> initial get */
> + audit_put_mark(exe); /* tmp mark, matches initial
> get */ return err;
> }
>
> @@ -1049,7 +1049,7 @@ out:
> if (tree)
> audit_put_tree(tree); /* that's the temporary
> one */ if (exe)
> - fsnotify_put_mark(exe->mark); /* match
> initial get */
> + audit_put_mark(exe); /* match initial get */
>
> return ret;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-18 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-18 3:09 [PATCH 00/14] audit by executable name Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 01/14] audit: implement audit by executable Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 02/14] audit: clean simple fsnotify implementation Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 03/14] audit: convert audit_exe to audit_fsnotify Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 04/14] fixup! " Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 13:38 ` Eric Paris
2014-06-18 20:18 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 05/14] fixup! audit: clean simple fsnotify implementation Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 06/14] audit: avoid double copying the audit_exe path string Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 07/14] fixup! audit: convert audit_exe to audit_fsnotify Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 08/14] fixup! audit: clean simple fsnotify implementation Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 09/14] audit: put rule existence check in canonical order Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 10/14] fixup! audit: implement audit by executable Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 11/14] " Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 12/14] fixup! audit: clean simple fsnotify implementation Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 13/14] audit: continue fleshing out audit by exe Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 14:08 ` Eric Paris
2014-06-25 20:19 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 14/14] audit: enable audit_get/put_mark() Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 14:09 ` Eric Paris [this message]
2014-06-18 20:21 ` Richard Guy Briggs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140618100931.3c2e9d38@flatline.rdu.redhat.com \
--to=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox