public inbox for linux-audit@redhat.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
To: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/14] audit: enable audit_get/put_mark()
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:09:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140618100931.3c2e9d38@flatline.rdu.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42425ec84afea28f141ec8ff0ef40d86246a5f32.1403060033.git.rgb@redhat.com>

Aside from the refcounting in the previous patch being bad, which you
likely didn't make any better here, I think I'm ok with
audit_put_mark/audit_get_mark being exposed and used instead of the
fsnotify_* calls being used directly...


On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 23:09:49 -0400
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> wrote:

> ---
>  kernel/audit.h          |    2 ++
>  kernel/audit_fsnotify.c |    6 +++---
>  kernel/auditfilter.c    |   10 +++++-----
>  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/audit.h b/kernel/audit.h
> index 2093c5e..3151ae5 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit.h
> +++ b/kernel/audit.h
> @@ -288,6 +288,8 @@ char *audit_mark_path(struct audit_fsnotify_mark
> *mark); int audit_add_mark_rule(struct audit_krule *krule, struct
> list_head **list); void audit_remove_mark(struct audit_fsnotify_mark
> *audit_mark); int audit_mark_compare(struct audit_fsnotify_mark
> *mark, unsigned long ino, dev_t dev); +void audit_get_mark(struct
> audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark); +void audit_put_mark(struct
> audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark); 
>  int audit_dup_exe(struct audit_krule *new, struct audit_krule *old);
>  int audit_exe_compare(struct task_struct *tsk, struct
> audit_fsnotify_mark *mark); diff --git a/kernel/audit_fsnotify.c
> b/kernel/audit_fsnotify.c index cc4175a..f5789e1 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit_fsnotify.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit_fsnotify.c
> @@ -65,14 +65,14 @@ static void audit_free_fsnotify_mark(struct
> fsnotify_mark *mark) audit_free_mark(audit_mark);
>  }
>  
> -#if 0 /* not sure if we need these... */
> -static void audit_get_mark(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark)
> +#if 1 /* not sure if we need these... */
> +void audit_get_mark(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark)
>  {
>  	if (likely(audit_mark))
>  		fsnotify_get_mark(&audit_mark->mark);
>  }
>  
> -static void audit_put_mark(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark)
> +void audit_put_mark(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark)
>  {
>  	if (likely(audit_mark))
>  		fsnotify_put_mark(&audit_mark->mark);
> diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> index 7b6e892..3d168ca 100644
> --- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
> +++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static inline void audit_free_rule(struct
> audit_entry *e) if (erule->watch)
>  		audit_put_watch(erule->watch);
>  	if (erule->exe)
> -		fsnotify_put_mark(erule->exe->mark);
> +		audit_put_mark(erule->exe);
>  	if (erule->fields)
>  		for (i = 0; i < erule->field_count; i++) {
>  			struct audit_field *f = &erule->fields[i];
> @@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static struct audit_entry
> *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data, err =
> PTR_ERR(audit_mark); goto exit_free;
>  			}
> -			fsnotify_get_mark(audit_mark->mark);
> +			audit_get_mark(audit_mark);
>  			entry->rule.exe = audit_mark;
>  			break;
>  		}
> @@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ exit_free:
>  	if (entry->rule.tree)
>  		audit_put_tree(entry->rule.tree); /* that's the
> temporary one */ if (entry->rule.exe)
> -		fsnotify_put_mark(entry->rule.exe->mark); /* matches
> initial get */
> +		audit_put_mark(entry->rule.exe); /* matches initial
> get */ audit_free_rule(entry);
>  	return ERR_PTR(err);
>  }
> @@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ error:
>  	if (watch)
>  		audit_put_watch(watch); /* tmp watch, matches
> initial get */ if (exe)
> -		fsnotify_put_mark(exe->mark); /* tmp mark, matches
> initial get */
> +		audit_put_mark(exe); /* tmp mark, matches initial
> get */ return err;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1049,7 +1049,7 @@ out:
>  	if (tree)
>  		audit_put_tree(tree);	/* that's the temporary
> one */ if (exe)
> -		fsnotify_put_mark(exe->mark);	/* match
> initial get */
> +		audit_put_mark(exe);	/* match initial get */
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-18 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-18  3:09 [PATCH 00/14] audit by executable name Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18  3:09 ` [PATCH 01/14] audit: implement audit by executable Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18  3:09 ` [PATCH 02/14] audit: clean simple fsnotify implementation Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18  3:09 ` [PATCH 03/14] audit: convert audit_exe to audit_fsnotify Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18  3:09 ` [PATCH 04/14] fixup! " Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 13:38   ` Eric Paris
2014-06-18 20:18     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18  3:09 ` [PATCH 05/14] fixup! audit: clean simple fsnotify implementation Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18  3:09 ` [PATCH 06/14] audit: avoid double copying the audit_exe path string Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18  3:09 ` [PATCH 07/14] fixup! audit: convert audit_exe to audit_fsnotify Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18  3:09 ` [PATCH 08/14] fixup! audit: clean simple fsnotify implementation Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18  3:09 ` [PATCH 09/14] audit: put rule existence check in canonical order Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18  3:09 ` [PATCH 10/14] fixup! audit: implement audit by executable Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18  3:09 ` [PATCH 11/14] " Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18  3:09 ` [PATCH 12/14] fixup! audit: clean simple fsnotify implementation Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18  3:09 ` [PATCH 13/14] audit: continue fleshing out audit by exe Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 14:08   ` Eric Paris
2014-06-25 20:19     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18  3:09 ` [PATCH 14/14] audit: enable audit_get/put_mark() Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 14:09   ` Eric Paris [this message]
2014-06-18 20:21     ` Richard Guy Briggs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140618100931.3c2e9d38@flatline.rdu.redhat.com \
    --to=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=rgb@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox