From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/14] audit: enable audit_get/put_mark()
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 16:21:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140618202118.GG19353@madcap2.tricolour.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140618100931.3c2e9d38@flatline.rdu.redhat.com>
On 14/06/18, Eric Paris wrote:
> Aside from the refcounting in the previous patch being bad, which you
> likely didn't make any better here, I think I'm ok with
> audit_put_mark/audit_get_mark being exposed and used instead of the
> fsnotify_* calls being used directly...
I still need to convince myself they are needed, but I'll figure that
out after I read more carefully your comments to the previous patch.
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 23:09:49 -0400
> Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> wrote:
> > ---
> > kernel/audit.h | 2 ++
> > kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 6 +++---
> > kernel/auditfilter.c | 10 +++++-----
> > 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/audit.h b/kernel/audit.h
> > index 2093c5e..3151ae5 100644
> > --- a/kernel/audit.h
> > +++ b/kernel/audit.h
> > @@ -288,6 +288,8 @@ char *audit_mark_path(struct audit_fsnotify_mark
> > *mark); int audit_add_mark_rule(struct audit_krule *krule, struct
> > list_head **list); void audit_remove_mark(struct audit_fsnotify_mark
> > *audit_mark); int audit_mark_compare(struct audit_fsnotify_mark
> > *mark, unsigned long ino, dev_t dev); +void audit_get_mark(struct
> > audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark); +void audit_put_mark(struct
> > audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark);
> > int audit_dup_exe(struct audit_krule *new, struct audit_krule *old);
> > int audit_exe_compare(struct task_struct *tsk, struct
> > audit_fsnotify_mark *mark); diff --git a/kernel/audit_fsnotify.c
> > b/kernel/audit_fsnotify.c index cc4175a..f5789e1 100644
> > --- a/kernel/audit_fsnotify.c
> > +++ b/kernel/audit_fsnotify.c
> > @@ -65,14 +65,14 @@ static void audit_free_fsnotify_mark(struct
> > fsnotify_mark *mark) audit_free_mark(audit_mark);
> > }
> >
> > -#if 0 /* not sure if we need these... */
> > -static void audit_get_mark(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark)
> > +#if 1 /* not sure if we need these... */
> > +void audit_get_mark(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark)
> > {
> > if (likely(audit_mark))
> > fsnotify_get_mark(&audit_mark->mark);
> > }
> >
> > -static void audit_put_mark(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark)
> > +void audit_put_mark(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark)
> > {
> > if (likely(audit_mark))
> > fsnotify_put_mark(&audit_mark->mark);
> > diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> > index 7b6e892..3d168ca 100644
> > --- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
> > +++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> > @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static inline void audit_free_rule(struct
> > audit_entry *e) if (erule->watch)
> > audit_put_watch(erule->watch);
> > if (erule->exe)
> > - fsnotify_put_mark(erule->exe->mark);
> > + audit_put_mark(erule->exe);
> > if (erule->fields)
> > for (i = 0; i < erule->field_count; i++) {
> > struct audit_field *f = &erule->fields[i];
> > @@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static struct audit_entry
> > *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data, err =
> > PTR_ERR(audit_mark); goto exit_free;
> > }
> > - fsnotify_get_mark(audit_mark->mark);
> > + audit_get_mark(audit_mark);
> > entry->rule.exe = audit_mark;
> > break;
> > }
> > @@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ exit_free:
> > if (entry->rule.tree)
> > audit_put_tree(entry->rule.tree); /* that's the
> > temporary one */ if (entry->rule.exe)
> > - fsnotify_put_mark(entry->rule.exe->mark); /* matches
> > initial get */
> > + audit_put_mark(entry->rule.exe); /* matches initial
> > get */ audit_free_rule(entry);
> > return ERR_PTR(err);
> > }
> > @@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ error:
> > if (watch)
> > audit_put_watch(watch); /* tmp watch, matches
> > initial get */ if (exe)
> > - fsnotify_put_mark(exe->mark); /* tmp mark, matches
> > initial get */
> > + audit_put_mark(exe); /* tmp mark, matches initial
> > get */ return err;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1049,7 +1049,7 @@ out:
> > if (tree)
> > audit_put_tree(tree); /* that's the temporary
> > one */ if (exe)
> > - fsnotify_put_mark(exe->mark); /* match
> > initial get */
> > + audit_put_mark(exe); /* match initial get */
> >
> > return ret;
> > }
>
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs@redhat.com>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-18 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-18 3:09 [PATCH 00/14] audit by executable name Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 01/14] audit: implement audit by executable Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 02/14] audit: clean simple fsnotify implementation Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 03/14] audit: convert audit_exe to audit_fsnotify Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 04/14] fixup! " Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 13:38 ` Eric Paris
2014-06-18 20:18 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 05/14] fixup! audit: clean simple fsnotify implementation Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 06/14] audit: avoid double copying the audit_exe path string Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 07/14] fixup! audit: convert audit_exe to audit_fsnotify Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 08/14] fixup! audit: clean simple fsnotify implementation Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 09/14] audit: put rule existence check in canonical order Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 10/14] fixup! audit: implement audit by executable Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 11/14] " Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 12/14] fixup! audit: clean simple fsnotify implementation Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 13/14] audit: continue fleshing out audit by exe Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 14:08 ` Eric Paris
2014-06-25 20:19 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 3:09 ` [PATCH 14/14] audit: enable audit_get/put_mark() Richard Guy Briggs
2014-06-18 14:09 ` Eric Paris
2014-06-18 20:21 ` Richard Guy Briggs [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140618202118.GG19353@madcap2.tricolour.ca \
--to=rgb@redhat.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox