* augenrules: -F missing operation for -k
@ 2021-05-20 14:56 warron.french
2021-05-20 16:08 ` Steve Grubb
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: warron.french @ 2021-05-20 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Audit
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 306 bytes --]
Does anybody know what this error means?
augenrules: -F missing operation for -k
I cannot figure out what rule is causing this, so I need a little
more context to figure out what to look for in my *.rules files under
/etc/audit/rules.d.
Thanks in advance,
--------------------------
Warron French
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 662 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 106 bytes --]
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: augenrules: -F missing operation for -k
2021-05-20 14:56 augenrules: -F missing operation for -k warron.french
@ 2021-05-20 16:08 ` Steve Grubb
2021-05-20 18:38 ` Steve Grubb
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Steve Grubb @ 2021-05-20 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Audit
On Thursday, May 20, 2021 10:56:00 AM EDT warron.french wrote:
> Does anybody know what this error means?
> augenrules: -F missing operation for -k
>
> I cannot figure out what rule is causing this, so I need a little
> more context to figure out what to look for in my *.rules files under
> /etc/audit/rules.d.
It means there is no value associated with a -F name=value construct. I am
thinking syslog should have the line number in the rules where this comes
from. Do you a -k some where that doesn't look right?
-Steve
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: augenrules: -F missing operation for -k
2021-05-20 16:08 ` Steve Grubb
@ 2021-05-20 18:38 ` Steve Grubb
2021-05-26 13:41 ` warron.french
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Steve Grubb @ 2021-05-20 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Audit
Hello,
On Thursday, May 20, 2021 12:08:56 PM EDT Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Thursday, May 20, 2021 10:56:00 AM EDT warron.french wrote:
> > Does anybody know what this error means?
> > augenrules: -F missing operation for -k
> >
> > I cannot figure out what rule is causing this, so I need a little
> > more context to figure out what to look for in my *.rules files under
> > /etc/audit/rules.d.
>
> It means there is no value associated with a -F name=value construct.
Actually, I misspoke. In the name=vale portion, it didn't find the '=' where
one was expected. Since it mentions '-k', you might be mixing watch syntax
with syscall syntax. -k keyname is valid with watches. For syscalls its -F
key=keyname.
-Steve
> I am thinking syslog should have the line number in the rules where this
> comes from. Do you a -k some where that doesn't look right?
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: augenrules: -F missing operation for -k
2021-05-20 18:38 ` Steve Grubb
@ 2021-05-26 13:41 ` warron.french
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: warron.french @ 2021-05-26 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steve Grubb; +Cc: Linux Audit
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1382 bytes --]
Steve, thanks. I am finally back in my environment looking for the
problem-syntax based on your feedback. I found nothing that matches "key=
<space>" or "-k <space>".
I don't see the error anymore. Perhaps a coworker addressed it.
--------------------------
Warron French
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 2:38 PM Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thursday, May 20, 2021 12:08:56 PM EDT Steve Grubb wrote:
> > On Thursday, May 20, 2021 10:56:00 AM EDT warron.french wrote:
> > > Does anybody know what this error means?
> > > augenrules: -F missing operation for -k
> > >
> > > I cannot figure out what rule is causing this, so I need a little
> > > more context to figure out what to look for in my *.rules files under
> > > /etc/audit/rules.d.
> >
> > It means there is no value associated with a -F name=value construct.
>
> Actually, I misspoke. In the name=vale portion, it didn't find the '='
> where
> one was expected. Since it mentions '-k', you might be mixing watch syntax
> with syscall syntax. -k keyname is valid with watches. For syscalls its
> -F
> key=keyname.
>
> -Steve
>
> > I am thinking syslog should have the line number in the rules where this
> > comes from. Do you a -k some where that doesn't look right?
>
>
>
>
> --
> Linux-audit mailing list
> Linux-audit@redhat.com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
>
>
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2318 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 106 bytes --]
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-05-26 13:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-05-20 14:56 augenrules: -F missing operation for -k warron.french
2021-05-20 16:08 ` Steve Grubb
2021-05-20 18:38 ` Steve Grubb
2021-05-26 13:41 ` warron.french
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox