* Should open syscall records occur without a path record?
@ 2007-07-23 13:09 John D. Ramsdell
2007-07-23 13:51 ` Steve Grubb
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: John D. Ramsdell @ 2007-07-23 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-audit
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 946 bytes --]
I have a test suite that generates every system call analyzed by our
package. The suite runs several programs that do a variety of things,
including opening files. I traced the set of programs, and retrieved
the records using
ausearch -r -p P > P.txt
where P is the process ID of each traced program.
When I attempt to analyze the logs, my program blows up because it
assumes that every syscall audit event for the open syscall will
include a PATH record. I made a quick edit of the analysis program,
and discovered that 24 open syscall records have no PATH record, and
sometimes the CWD record is missing too.
$ python auditopen.py -i ../autsv/*.txt
Of 421 events with a SYSCALL record with syscall=open
401 have CWD
397 have PATH
0 have CWD but no PATH
$
Is it appropriate for audit analysis programs to assume a PATH record
will be available with every open syscall event? I cannot see how to
do my analysis without the PATH record.
[-- Attachment #2: audit open check --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 7616 bytes --]
#! /usr/bin/python -E
"""Analyzes audit output.
Some more documentation should go here.
Package: @PACKAGE@
Version: @VERSION@
"""
# Authors: John D. Ramsdell
#
# Copyright (C) 2007 The MITRE Corporation
# see file 'COPYING' for use and warranty information
#
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
# published by the Free Software Foundation; version 2 only
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
import sys, getopt, auparse, os.path, copy, string
# Log Parsing
class AuditLog(object):
"""AuditLog(AuParser or file, bool)
Encapsulates a log accessed by the auparse module. It provides an
iterator to the log's events. Each call to the next method of
the iterator returns an AuditEvent. The boolean determines if
numeric entities in fields are interpreted.
"""
def __init__(self, au, interpret = False):
if isinstance(au, file):
self.au = auparse.AuParser(auparse.AUSOURCE_FILE_POINTER, au)
else:
self.au = au
self.interpret = interpret
def __iter__(self):
return AuditLogIter(self)
class AuditLogIter(object):
"""AuditLogIter(AuditLog)
An iterator for an audit log.
"""
def __init__(self, aulog):
self.au = aulog.au
self.interpret = aulog.interpret
def next(self):
"""Returns an AuditEvent
"""
au = self.au
interpret = self.interpret
if not au.parse_next_event():
raise StopIteration()
event = AuditEvent(au.get_timestamp())
for i in range(au.get_num_records()):
record = AuditRecord(event)
for j in range(au.get_num_fields()):
name = au.get_field_name()
if interpret:
value = au.interpret_field()
else:
value = au.get_field_str()
record[name] = value
au.next_field()
event.append(record)
au.next_record()
return event
class AuditEvent(list):
"""AuditEvent(AuEvent)
An audit event is represented as a list of AuditRecord's. Each
AuditRecord is a dictionary that represents one of the records
that make up the event.
"""
def __init__(self, timestamp):
self.timestamp = timestamp
def get_timestamp(self):
"""Get the timestamp associated with this event."""
return self.timestamp
def find_record_of_type(self, typ):
"""Find record of type
Returns a record in the event that has the given type.
Returns None when there is no such record.
"""
for record in self:
try:
if record["type"] == typ:
return record
except KeyError:
pass
return None
def find_value(self, name):
"""Find a value
Returns a value associated with the given name in some record
in the event. Raises KeyError if no field has the given name.
"""
for record in self:
try:
return record[name]
except KeyError:
pass
raise KeyError
def find_path_record(self, item):
"""Find a PATH record for the given item.
Returns the PATH record for the given item. Return None if
PATH record cannot be found.
"""
item = str(item) # Ensure item is a string
for record in self:
if record.is_path_record(item):
return record
return None
class AuditRecord(dict):
"""AuditRecord(AuditEvent)
An audit record is a dictionary.
"""
def __init__(self, event):
self.event = event
def get_event(self):
"""Get the event associated with this record."""
return self.event
def is_path_record(self, item):
"""Is this a PATH record for the given item?"""
try:
return self["type"] == "PATH" and self["item"] == item
except KeyError:
return False
def args2aulog():
"""Make an AuditLog from command line arguments
Create an audit log object based on the command line arguments
passsed to this program.
Returns an AuditLog.
"""
interpret = False # Event reading mode
output_file = None # Output file name for results
try:
long_opts = ["help", "interpret", "raw", "output="]
opts, args = getopt.getopt(sys.argv[1:], "hiro:", long_opts)
except getopt.GetoptError:
# Bad options
usage()
sys.exit(2)
for o, a in opts:
if o in ("-h", "--help"):
# Print help information
usage()
sys.exit(0)
elif o in ("-i", "--interpret"):
interpret = True
elif o in ("-r", "--raw"):
interpret = False
elif o in ("-o", "--output"):
# Record output file name
output_file = a
# Determine input source
if len(args) > 0:
au = auparse.AuParser(auparse.AUSOURCE_FILE_ARRAY, args)
sys.stdin.close()
else:
au = sys.stdin
# Open output file as standard output
if output_file:
sys.stdout.close()
try:
sys.stdout = file(output_file, 'w')
except IOError:
sys.stderr.write("cannot open %s for writing" % output_file)
sys.exit(1)
return AuditLog(au, interpret)
def usage():
"""Show usage
Print a ussage message that includes version information.
"""
help = """Version: %s %s
Usage: %s [OPTIONS] [FILE...]
-o FILE, --output=FILE output to FILE (default is standard output)
-i, --interpret interpret numeric entities into text
-r --raw do not interpret numeric entities (default)
-h, --help print this message and exit
With no FILEs, read from the standard input.
"""
sys.stderr.write(help % ("@PACKAGE@", "@VERSION@", sys.argv[0]))
# Consume a log
def run(log):
"""The main loop for consuming a log."""
openno = 0
cwdno = 0
pathno = 0
cwdnopathno = 0
for event in log:
record = event.find_record_of_type("SYSCALL")
if record:
syscall = record["syscall"]
if syscall == "open":
openno = openno + 1
has_cwd = event.find_record_of_type("CWD")
has_path = event.find_record_of_type("PATH")
if has_cwd:
cwdno = cwdno + 1
if has_path:
pathno = pathno + 1
if has_path and not has_cwd:
cwdnopathno = cwdnopathno + 1
print "Of %d events with a SYSCALL record with syscall=open" % openno
print "%d have CWD" % cwdno
print "%d have PATH" % pathno
print "%d have CWD but no PATH" % cwdnopathno
def main():
"""Main routine
Perform command line processing and then conume the log.
"""
run(args2aulog())
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: Should open syscall records occur without a path record?
2007-07-23 13:09 Should open syscall records occur without a path record? John D. Ramsdell
@ 2007-07-23 13:51 ` Steve Grubb
2007-07-23 14:07 ` John D. Ramsdell
2007-07-23 18:47 ` John D. Ramsdell
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Steve Grubb @ 2007-07-23 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-audit
On Monday 23 July 2007 09:09:22 John D. Ramsdell wrote:
> Is it appropriate for audit analysis programs to assume a PATH record
> will be available with every open syscall event? I cannot see how to
> do my analysis without the PATH record.
There should be a PATH record for every open. Have you verified the logs or
trusting ausearch? (Trying to figure out if there is a kernel problem or
search problem.) As a first step, I'd construct some kind of regex command to
see if you can verify that the kernel is recording PATH records for all
opens. You may need to narrow the test case so that there aren't as many
records to dig through.
-Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Should open syscall records occur without a path record?
2007-07-23 13:51 ` Steve Grubb
@ 2007-07-23 14:07 ` John D. Ramsdell
2007-07-23 18:47 ` John D. Ramsdell
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: John D. Ramsdell @ 2007-07-23 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steve Grubb; +Cc: linux-audit
Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com> writes:
> There should be a PATH record for every open.
Okay, I'll direct my search as you suggested. I'll delete the current
audit log, restart my daemon, run the test suite, and then compare the
raw log with what one gets from ausearch. I'll modify my python
program to print the timestamp of an open event without a path, easing
the task of finding the record in the raw data. Alas, the part of my
day free of meetings is at an end, but I'll get on this soon.
John
PS. The output of my program should have said:
$ python auditopen.py -i ../autsv/*.txt
Of 421 events with a SYSCALL record with syscall=open
401 have CWD
397 have PATH
0 have PATH but no CWN
$
The last line in the original message erroneously said:
0 have CWD but no PATH
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Should open syscall records occur without a path record?
2007-07-23 13:51 ` Steve Grubb
2007-07-23 14:07 ` John D. Ramsdell
@ 2007-07-23 18:47 ` John D. Ramsdell
2007-07-23 19:00 ` Steve Grubb
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: John D. Ramsdell @ 2007-07-23 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-audit
Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com> writes:
> There should be a PATH record for every open. Have you verified the
> logs or trusting ausearch?
The short version of what I found is that the missing PATH records
always appear in the raw logs, but both ausearch and auparse fail to
return some PATH records with their associated SYSCALL record. A PATH
record gets ignored when another syscall event record occurs between
the SYSCALL record and the PATH record.
I'll send you a long version of my results off line as the data to
support the report is voluminous.
John
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Should open syscall records occur without a path record?
2007-07-23 18:47 ` John D. Ramsdell
@ 2007-07-23 19:00 ` Steve Grubb
2007-07-23 19:41 ` John D. Ramsdell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Steve Grubb @ 2007-07-23 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-audit
On Monday 23 July 2007 14:47:33 John D. Ramsdell wrote:
> A PATH record gets ignored when another syscall event record occurs between
> the SYSCALL record and the PATH record.
OK good. That is a known problem (bz 235398) that should be worked on right
after we get the improved dispatcher finished.
-Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Should open syscall records occur without a path record?
2007-07-23 19:00 ` Steve Grubb
@ 2007-07-23 19:41 ` John D. Ramsdell
2007-07-23 19:56 ` Steve Grubb
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: John D. Ramsdell @ 2007-07-23 19:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steve Grubb; +Cc: linux-audit
Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com> writes:
> OK good. That is a known problem (bz 235398) that should be worked
> on right after we get the improved dispatcher finished.
Hmm. I'm wedged if I cannot process open system call records. I bet
I can quickly write some script that interchanges adjacent audit
records that are out of order in the raw logs, so as to allow me to
proceed. If someone else has a record sorter, please send it along.
John
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Should open syscall records occur without a path record?
2007-07-23 19:41 ` John D. Ramsdell
@ 2007-07-23 19:56 ` Steve Grubb
2007-07-24 12:06 ` John D. Ramsdell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Steve Grubb @ 2007-07-23 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John D. Ramsdell; +Cc: linux-audit
On Monday 23 July 2007 15:41:31 John D. Ramsdell wrote:
> I bet
> I can quickly write some script that interchanges adjacent audit
> records that are out of order in the raw logs, so as to allow me to
> proceed. If someone else has a record sorter, please send it along.
setroubleshoot is written in python and it sorts its input stream to solve
this in the mean time. You might look there for some example code.
-Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Should open syscall records occur without a path record?
2007-07-23 19:56 ` Steve Grubb
@ 2007-07-24 12:06 ` John D. Ramsdell
2007-07-24 21:30 ` Steve Grubb
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: John D. Ramsdell @ 2007-07-24 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steve Grubb; +Cc: linux-audit
Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com> writes:
> setroubleshoot is written in python and it sorts its input stream to solve
> this in the mean time. You might look there for some example code.
I was unable to find the relevant code with a quick look, but I didn't
take much time as I knew a short script would to do the trick. I just
sorted on the serial numbers in the audit message. Diff'ing showed
quite a bit of motion in the sorted output. Also, I notice that in
just one message, the msg field value does not end with a colon:
type=DAEMON_START msg=audit(1185203485.586:824) auditd start, ver=1.5.5, format=raw, auid=500 pid=24638 res=success, auditd pid=24638
John
#! /bin/sh
python -E -c '
import sys, re
def main():
pattern = re.compile("\smsg=audit\(\d+\.\d+:(\d+)\):?\s")
for line in sys.stdin:
match = pattern.search(line)
if not match:
sys.stderr.write("cannot parse audit message: '\''%s'\''\n" % line)
sys.exit(1)
sys.stdout.write(match.group(1) + "\t" + line)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
' | sort -n -s -k 1 | cut -f 2-
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: Should open syscall records occur without a path record?
2007-07-24 12:06 ` John D. Ramsdell
@ 2007-07-24 21:30 ` Steve Grubb
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Steve Grubb @ 2007-07-24 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John D. Ramsdell; +Cc: linux-audit
On Tuesday 24 July 2007 08:06:44 am John D. Ramsdell wrote:
> Also, I notice that in
> just one message, the msg field value does not end with a colon:
>
> type=DAEMON_START msg=audit(1185203485.586:824) auditd start, ver=1.5.5,
> format=raw, auid=500 pid=24638 res=success, auditd pid=24638
Actually, it looks like all the DAEMON_ records are missing a ':' after the
timestamp. The parsers are not exactly looking for it, but I'll add it for
consistency.
-Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-07-24 21:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-23 13:09 Should open syscall records occur without a path record? John D. Ramsdell
2007-07-23 13:51 ` Steve Grubb
2007-07-23 14:07 ` John D. Ramsdell
2007-07-23 18:47 ` John D. Ramsdell
2007-07-23 19:00 ` Steve Grubb
2007-07-23 19:41 ` John D. Ramsdell
2007-07-23 19:56 ` Steve Grubb
2007-07-24 12:06 ` John D. Ramsdell
2007-07-24 21:30 ` Steve Grubb
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox