From: asdx <asdx52@cock.li>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: Konstantin Shelekhin <k.shelekhin@ftml.net>,
admin@aquinas.su, linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
list-bcachefs@carlthompson.net, malte.schroeder@tnxip.de,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs changes for 6.17
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 04:17:07 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e81bbfd-1688-46bd-bf38-252fed3b1c82@cock.li> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <rabpjlpydnsnlkrgqmolvgg5tyo2kk5v45evwdt6ffetsqynfy@dt2r3cxio5my>
On 8/12/25 4:04 AM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 03:52:39AM -0300, asdx wrote:
>> On 8/11/25 11:26 AM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 12:51:11PM +0300, Konstantin Shelekhin wrote:
>>>>> Yes, this is accurate. I've been getting entirely too many emails from Linus about
>>>>> how pissed off everyone is, completely absent of details - or anything engineering
>>>>> related, for that matter.
>>>> That's because this is not an engineering problem, it's a communication problem. You just piss
>>>> people off for no good reason. Then people get tired of dealing with you and now we're here,
>>>> with Linus thinking about `git rm -rf fs/bcachesfs`. Will your users be happy? Probably not.
>>>> Will your sponsors be happy? Probably not either. Then why are you keep doing this?
>>>>
>>>> If you really want to change the way things work go see a therapist. A competent enough doctor
>>>> probably can fix all that in a couple of months.
>>> Konstantin, please tell me what you're basing this on.
>>>
>>> The claims I've been hearing have simply lacked any kind of specifics;
>>> if there's people I'd pissed off for no reason, I would've been happy to
>>> apologize, but I'm not aware of the incidences you're claiming - not
>>> within a year or more; I have made real efforts to tone things down.
>>>
>> You keep lying. How can you be so cynical? Just two days ago you were
>> complaining on #bcache about how much control Linus has over Linux and there
>> was a lot of talk about getting him removed from Linux via CoC action.
> Are you the same guy who was just posting this on Phoronix? Either
> you're trolling, or you misread something.
>
> For the record, I'm one of the more anti CoC people out there - I agree
> with the spirit of their goals, not so much the approach. I would never
> invoke them on anyone; I prefer to talk things out (and I don't mind
> getting flamed, so long as it doesn't get in the way of the work).
I read your messages well.
Linus Torvalds is way more valuable than bcachefs. Please back off.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-12 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-28 15:14 [GIT PULL] bcachefs changes for 6.17 Kent Overstreet
2025-08-05 21:19 ` Malte Schröder
2025-08-05 22:41 ` Carl E. Thompson
2025-08-07 12:42 ` Aquinas Admin
2025-08-09 17:36 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-08-09 19:21 ` Josef Bacik
2025-08-09 20:37 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-08-09 21:34 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-08-10 2:24 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-08-10 3:17 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-08-10 4:05 ` Sasha Levin
2025-08-10 4:13 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-08-10 4:26 ` Gerald B. Cox
2025-08-10 5:17 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-08-10 5:59 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-08-10 6:51 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-08-10 10:22 ` Martin Steigerwald
2025-08-11 15:48 ` Peanut gallery 2c James Lawrence
2025-08-11 16:08 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-08-11 17:00 ` James Lawrence
[not found] ` <aJsIOj6jbPKayO0s@mayhem.fritz.box>
2025-08-12 16:26 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-08-11 16:48 ` [GIT PULL] bcachefs changes for 6.17 Aquinas Admin
2025-08-10 8:02 ` Martin Steigerwald
2025-08-10 6:05 ` Carl E. Thompson
2025-08-11 16:02 ` Aquinas Admin
2025-08-11 16:09 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-08-09 23:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-08-09 23:13 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-08-12 7:49 ` Jani Partanen
2025-08-12 10:09 ` Martin Steigerwald
2025-08-11 9:51 ` Konstantin Shelekhin
2025-08-11 14:26 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-08-11 18:13 ` Carl E. Thompson
2025-08-11 18:40 ` Malte Schröder
2025-08-12 0:44 ` Carl E. Thompson
2025-08-11 18:48 ` Aquinas Admin
2025-08-11 19:42 ` Martin Steigerwald
2025-08-11 21:04 ` Konstantin Shelekhin
2025-08-12 1:08 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-08-12 6:52 ` asdx
2025-08-12 7:04 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-08-12 7:17 ` asdx [this message]
2025-08-12 19:35 ` Keith Busch
2025-08-12 20:03 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-08-12 20:30 ` Keith Busch
2025-08-12 20:31 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-08-12 20:38 ` Keith Busch
2025-08-12 20:45 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-08-12 20:54 ` Keith Busch
2025-08-12 20:57 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-08-11 16:45 ` Aquinas Admin
2025-08-10 4:29 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2025-08-07 14:27 ` Martin Steigerwald
2025-08-07 17:29 ` Peter Schneider
2025-08-10 6:20 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2025-08-10 10:32 ` Martin Steigerwald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9e81bbfd-1688-46bd-bf38-252fed3b1c82@cock.li \
--to=asdx52@cock.li \
--cc=admin@aquinas.su \
--cc=k.shelekhin@ftml.net \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=list-bcachefs@carlthompson.net \
--cc=malte.schroeder@tnxip.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox