Re: [PATCH blktests 0/7] Further stacked device atomic writes testing

[John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>]

On 17/09/2025 13:02, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
>>>     TEST_DEV_ARRAY[md/002]="/dev/nvme0n1 /dev/nvme1n1 /dev/nvme2n1 /dev/nvvme3n1"
>>>
>>> I need to do some trials to see if this idea is feasible.
>> ok
> FYI, I implemented the idea above, and it looks working good. I created a
> blktests patch series and posited [3]. Let's see how the review process will go.
> 
> [3]https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/linux- 
> block/20250917114920.142996-1-shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com/__;!! 
> ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!NNGuj9SVoLIwKksQudWC5ktgS6vIXTX1dGSmibli2- 
> httSpUBfSHAIL1i2z-aCmYSXUZxmwGZswO2KJ6Ei8gwkK3safu$ 
> 
> The series introduced a bit different config file variable TEST_CASE_DEV_ARRAY.
> If you give it a try, please define it like,
> 
>    TEST_CASE_DEV_ARRAY[md/003]="/dev/nvme1n1 /dev/nvme2n1 /dev/nvme3n1 /dev/nvme4n1"

ok, understood

> 
> It also has slightly different variables for use in the test_device_array()
> function: TEST_DEV_ARRAY and TEST_DEV_ARRAY_SYSFS_DIRS. As an example, I made a
> quick commit on top of your patches [4].
> 
> [4]https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/kawasaki/blktests/commit/ 
> fae0b3b617a19dab60610f50361bb0da6e0543ea__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ! 
> NNGuj9SVoLIwKksQudWC5ktgS6vIXTX1dGSmibli2-httSpUBfSHAIL1i2z- 
> aCmYSXUZxmwGZswO2KJ6Ei8gwmoYAPTl$ 
> 
> I will review details of your patches tomorrow.

great, thanks.

I'll test md/002 and md/003 today with all these changes.

John