From: "tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Cc: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] blk-mq: Fix race between resetting the timer and completion handling
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 12:07:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180207200724.GD695913@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1518027251.2870.53.camel@wdc.com>
Hello, Bart.
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 06:14:13PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> When I wrote my comment I was not sure whether or not non-reentrancy is
> guaranteed for work queue items. However, according to what I found in the
> workqueue implementation I think that is guaranteed. So it shouldn't be
> possible that the timer activated by blk_add_timer() gets handled before
> aborted_gstate is reset. But since the timeout handler and completion
Yeah, we're basically single threaded in the timeout path.
> handlers can be executed by different CPUs, shouldn't a memory barrier be
> inserted between the blk_add_timer() call and resetting aborted_gsync to
> guarantee that a completion cannot occur before blk_add_timer() has reset
> RQF_MQ_TIMEOUT_EXPIRED?
Ah, you're right. u64_stat_sync doesn't imply barriers, so we want
something like the following.
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index df93102..d6edf3b 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ static void blk_mq_rq_update_aborted_gstate(struct request *rq, u64 gstate)
*/
local_irq_save(flags);
u64_stats_update_begin(&rq->aborted_gstate_sync);
- rq->aborted_gstate = gstate;
+ smp_store_release(&rq->aborted_gstate, gstate);
u64_stats_update_end(&rq->aborted_gstate_sync);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
@@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ static u64 blk_mq_rq_aborted_gstate(struct request *rq)
do {
start = u64_stats_fetch_begin(&rq->aborted_gstate_sync);
- aborted_gstate = rq->aborted_gstate;
+ aborted_gstate = smp_load_acquire(&rq->aborted_gstate);
} while (u64_stats_fetch_retry(&rq->aborted_gstate_sync, start));
return aborted_gstate;
@@ -836,8 +836,8 @@ static void blk_mq_rq_timed_out(struct request *req, bool reserved)
* ->aborted_gstate is set, this may lead to ignored
* completions and further spurious timeouts.
*/
- blk_mq_rq_update_aborted_gstate(req, 0);
blk_add_timer(req);
+ blk_mq_rq_update_aborted_gstate(req, 0);
break;
case BLK_EH_NOT_HANDLED:
break;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-07 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-07 1:11 [PATCH v2] blk-mq: Fix race between resetting the timer and completion handling Bart Van Assche
2018-02-07 17:06 ` Tejun Heo
2018-02-07 17:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-07 17:35 ` tj
2018-02-07 18:14 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-07 20:07 ` tj [this message]
2018-02-07 23:48 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-08 1:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-08 15:39 ` tj
2018-02-08 15:40 ` tj
2018-02-08 16:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-08 17:00 ` tj
2018-02-08 17:10 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-08 17:19 ` tj
2018-02-08 17:37 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-08 17:40 ` tj
2018-02-08 17:48 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-08 17:54 ` tj
2018-02-13 21:20 ` tj
2018-02-14 16:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-18 13:11 ` tj
2018-02-21 18:53 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-21 19:21 ` tj
2018-02-21 22:55 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-07 19:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-07 20:09 ` tj
2018-02-07 21:02 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-07 21:40 ` tj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180207200724.GD695913@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox