From: "tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Cc: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] blk-mq: Fix race between resetting the timer and completion handling
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 13:40:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180207214009.GG695913@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1518037339.2870.61.camel@wdc.com>
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 09:02:21PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> The patch that I used in my test had an smp_wmb() call (see also below). Anyway,
> I will see whether I can extract more state information through debugfs.
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index ef4f6df0f1df..8eb2105d82b7 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -827,13 +827,9 @@ static void blk_mq_rq_timed_out(struct request *req, bool reserved)
> __blk_mq_complete_request(req);
> break;
> case BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER:
> - /*
> - * As nothing prevents from completion happening while
> - * ->aborted_gstate is set, this may lead to ignored
> - * completions and further spurious timeouts.
> - */
> - blk_mq_rq_update_aborted_gstate(req, 0);
> blk_add_timer(req);
> + smp_wmb();
> + blk_mq_rq_update_aborted_gstate(req, 0);
Without the matching rmb, just adding rmb won't do much but given the
default strong ordering on x86 and other operations around, what you
were seeing is probably not caused by lack of barriers.
Thanks.
--
tejun
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-07 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-07 1:11 [PATCH v2] blk-mq: Fix race between resetting the timer and completion handling Bart Van Assche
2018-02-07 17:06 ` Tejun Heo
2018-02-07 17:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-07 17:35 ` tj
2018-02-07 18:14 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-07 20:07 ` tj
2018-02-07 23:48 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-08 1:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-08 15:39 ` tj
2018-02-08 15:40 ` tj
2018-02-08 16:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-08 17:00 ` tj
2018-02-08 17:10 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-08 17:19 ` tj
2018-02-08 17:37 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-08 17:40 ` tj
2018-02-08 17:48 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-08 17:54 ` tj
2018-02-13 21:20 ` tj
2018-02-14 16:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-18 13:11 ` tj
2018-02-21 18:53 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-21 19:21 ` tj
2018-02-21 22:55 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-07 19:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-07 20:09 ` tj
2018-02-07 21:02 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-07 21:40 ` tj [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180207214009.GG695913@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox