From: "tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Cc: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] blk-mq: Fix race between resetting the timer and completion handling
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 09:00:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180208170010.GP695913@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1518107501.3611.19.camel@wdc.com>
Hello, Bart.
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 04:31:43PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > That sounds more like a scsi hotplug bug than an issue in the timeout
> > code unless we messed up @req pointer to begin with.
>
> I don't think that this is related to SCSI hotplugging: this crash does not
> occur with the v4.15 block layer core and it does not occur with my timeout
> handler rework patch applied either. I think that means that we cannot
> exclude the block layer core timeout handler rework as a possible cause.
>
> The disassembler output is as follows:
>
> (gdb) disas /s scsi_times_out
> Dump of assembler code for function scsi_times_out:
> drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c:
> 282 {
> 0x0000000000005bd0 <+0>: push %r13
> 0x0000000000005bd2 <+2>: push %r12
> 0x0000000000005bd4 <+4>: push %rbp
> ./include/linux/blk-mq.h:
> 300 return rq + 1;
> 0x0000000000005bd5 <+5>: lea 0x178(%rdi),%rbp
> drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c:
> 282 {
> 0x0000000000005bdc <+12>: push %rbx
> 283 struct scsi_cmnd *scmd = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
> 284 enum blk_eh_timer_return rtn = BLK_EH_NOT_HANDLED;
> 285 struct Scsi_Host *host = scmd->device->host;
> 0x0000000000005bdd <+13>: mov 0x1b0(%rdi),%rax
> 282 {
> 0x0000000000005be4 <+20>: mov %rdi,%rbx
> 283 struct scsi_cmnd *scmd = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
> 284 enum blk_eh_timer_return rtn = BLK_EH_NOT_HANDLED;
> 285 struct Scsi_Host *host = scmd->device->host;
> 0x0000000000005be7 <+23>: mov (%rax),%r13
> 0x0000000000005bea <+26>: nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
> [ ... ]
> (gdb) print /x sizeof(struct request)
> $2 = 0x178
> (gdb) print &(((struct scsi_cmnd*)0)->device)
> $4 = (struct scsi_device **) 0x38 <scsi_cmd_get_serial+8>
> (gdb) print &(((struct scsi_device*)0)->host)
> $5 = (struct Scsi_Host **) 0x0
>
> The crash is reported at address scsi_times_out+0x17 == scsi_times_out+23. The
> instruction at that address tries to dereference scsi_cmnd.device (%rax). The
> register dump shows that that pointer has the value NULL. The only function I
> know of that clears the scsi_cmnd.device pointer is scsi_req_init(). The only
> caller of that function in the SCSI core is scsi_initialize_rq(). That function
> has two callers, namely scsi_init_command() and blk_get_request(). However,
> the scsi_cmnd.device pointer is not cleared when a request finishes. This is
> why I think that the above crash report indicates that scsi_times_out() was
> called for a request that was being reinitialized and not by device hotplugging.
I could be misreading it but scsi_cmnd->device dereference should be
the following.
0x0000000000005bdd <+13>: mov 0x1b0(%rdi),%rax
%rdi is @req, 0x1b0(%rdi) seems to be the combined arithmetic of
blk_mq_rq_to_pdu() and ->device dereference - 0x178 + 0x38. The
faulting access is (%rax), which is deref'ing host from device.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-08 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-07 1:11 [PATCH v2] blk-mq: Fix race between resetting the timer and completion handling Bart Van Assche
2018-02-07 17:06 ` Tejun Heo
2018-02-07 17:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-07 17:35 ` tj
2018-02-07 18:14 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-07 20:07 ` tj
2018-02-07 23:48 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-08 1:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-08 15:39 ` tj
2018-02-08 15:40 ` tj
2018-02-08 16:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-08 17:00 ` tj [this message]
2018-02-08 17:10 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-08 17:19 ` tj
2018-02-08 17:37 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-08 17:40 ` tj
2018-02-08 17:48 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-08 17:54 ` tj
2018-02-13 21:20 ` tj
2018-02-14 16:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-18 13:11 ` tj
2018-02-21 18:53 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-21 19:21 ` tj
2018-02-21 22:55 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-07 19:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-07 20:09 ` tj
2018-02-07 21:02 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-07 21:40 ` tj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180208170010.GP695913@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox