From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Israel Rukshin <israelr@mellanox.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] blk-mq: Fix race conditions in request timeout handling
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 16:41:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180410084133.GB9133@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180410013455.7448-1-bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 06:34:55PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> If a completion occurs after blk_mq_rq_timed_out() has reset
> rq->aborted_gstate and the request is again in flight when the timeout
Given rq->aborted_gstate is reset only for BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER, I
think you are addressing the race between normal completion and
the timeout of BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER.
> expires then a request will be completed twice: a first time by the
> timeout handler and a second time when the regular completion occurs.
This patch looks simpler, and more like the previous model of
using blk_mark_rq_complete().
I have one question:
- with this patch, rq's state is updated atomically as cmpxchg. Suppose
one rq is timed out, the rq's state is updated as MQ_RQ_COMPLETE by
blk_mq_check_expired(), then ops->timeout() is run and
BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER is returned, so blk_mq_add_timer(req, MQ_RQ_COMPLETE,
MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT) is called to update rq's state into MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT.
Now the original normal completion still may occur after rq's state
becomes MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT, and seems there is still the double completion
with this patch? Maybe I am wrong, please explain a bit.
And synchronize_rcu() is needed by Tejun's approach between marking
COMPLETE and handling this rq's timeout, and the time can be quite long,
I guess it might be easier to trigger?
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-10 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-10 1:34 [PATCH v4] blk-mq: Fix race conditions in request timeout handling Bart Van Assche
2018-04-10 7:59 ` jianchao.wang
2018-04-10 10:04 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-10 12:04 ` Shan Hai
2018-04-10 13:01 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-10 14:32 ` jianchao.wang
2018-04-10 8:41 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2018-04-10 12:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-10 13:55 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-10 14:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-10 14:30 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-10 15:02 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-10 15:25 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-10 15:30 ` tj
2018-04-10 15:38 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-10 15:40 ` tj
2018-04-10 21:33 ` tj
2018-04-10 21:46 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-10 21:54 ` tj
2018-04-11 12:50 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-11 14:16 ` tj
2018-04-11 18:38 ` Martin Steigerwald
2018-04-11 14:24 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-11 14:43 ` tj
2018-04-11 16:16 ` Israel Rukshin
2018-04-11 17:07 ` tj
2018-04-11 21:31 ` tj
2018-04-12 8:59 ` Israel Rukshin
2018-04-12 13:35 ` tj
2018-04-15 12:28 ` Israel Rukshin
2018-04-18 16:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-10 9:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-10 13:26 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-10 14:50 ` hch
2018-04-10 14:41 ` Jens Axboe
2018-04-10 14:20 ` Tejun Heo
2018-04-10 14:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-10 14:33 ` tj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180410084133.GB9133@ming.t460p \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=israelr@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxg@mellanox.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox