Linux block layer
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	Israel Rukshin <israelr@mellanox.com>,
	Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] blk-mq: Fix race conditions in request timeout handling
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:41:57 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a34de069-2df9-177b-918c-cdbf747ebd79@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180410095537.GA19266@lst.de>

On 4/10/18 3:55 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 06:34:55PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> If a completion occurs after blk_mq_rq_timed_out() has reset
>> rq->aborted_gstate and the request is again in flight when the timeout
>> expires then a request will be completed twice: a first time by the
>> timeout handler and a second time when the regular completion occurs.
>>
>> Additionally, the blk-mq timeout handling code ignores completions that
>> occur after blk_mq_check_expired() has been called and before
>> blk_mq_rq_timed_out() has reset rq->aborted_gstate. If a block driver
>> timeout handler always returns BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER then the result will
>> be that the request never terminates.
>>
>> Since the request state can be updated from two different contexts,
>> namely regular completion and request timeout, this race cannot be
>> fixed with RCU synchronization only. Fix this race as follows:
>> - Split __deadline in two variables, namely lq_deadline for legacy
>>   request queues and mq_deadline for blk-mq request queues. Use atomic
>>   operations to update mq_deadline.
> 
> I don't think we need the atomic_long_cmpxchg, and can do with a plain
> cmpxhg.  Also unterminated cmpxchg loops are a bad idea, but I think
> both callers are protected from other changes so we can turn that
> into a WARN_ON().  That plus some minor cleanups in the version below,
> only boot tested:

This version looks reasonable, let me throw it through the testing
machinery.

-- 
Jens Axboe

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-04-10 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-10  1:34 [PATCH v4] blk-mq: Fix race conditions in request timeout handling Bart Van Assche
2018-04-10  7:59 ` jianchao.wang
2018-04-10 10:04   ` Ming Lei
2018-04-10 12:04     ` Shan Hai
2018-04-10 13:01   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-10 14:32     ` jianchao.wang
2018-04-10  8:41 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-10 12:58   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-10 13:55     ` Ming Lei
2018-04-10 14:09       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-10 14:30         ` Ming Lei
2018-04-10 15:02           ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-10 15:25             ` Ming Lei
2018-04-10 15:30               ` tj
2018-04-10 15:38                 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-10 15:40                   ` tj
2018-04-10 21:33                     ` tj
2018-04-10 21:46                       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-10 21:54                         ` tj
2018-04-11 12:50                           ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-11 14:16                             ` tj
2018-04-11 18:38                             ` Martin Steigerwald
2018-04-11 14:24                           ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-11 14:43                             ` tj
2018-04-11 16:16                             ` Israel Rukshin
2018-04-11 17:07                               ` tj
2018-04-11 21:31                                 ` tj
2018-04-12  8:59                                   ` Israel Rukshin
2018-04-12 13:35                                     ` tj
2018-04-15 12:28                                       ` Israel Rukshin
2018-04-18 16:34                           ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-10  9:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-10 13:26   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-10 14:50     ` hch
2018-04-10 14:41   ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2018-04-10 14:20 ` Tejun Heo
2018-04-10 14:30   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-10 14:33     ` tj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a34de069-2df9-177b-918c-cdbf747ebd79@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=israelr@mellanox.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox