Linux block layer
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"israelr@mellanox.com" <israelr@mellanox.com>,
	"sagi@grimberg.me" <sagi@grimberg.me>, "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"maxg@mellanox.com" <maxg@mellanox.com>,
	"tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] blk-mq: Fix race conditions in request timeout handling
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 22:30:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180410143007.GB22340@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c4a8b019182d5a9259ef20e6462b3f6a533abed.camel@wdc.com>

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:09:33PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 21:55 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Then I have same question with Jianchao, what is the actual double
> > complete in linus tree between BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER and normal completion?
> > 
> > Follows my understanding:
> > 
> > 1) when timeout is detected on one request, its aborted_gstate is
> > updated in blk_mq_check_expired().
> > 
> > 2) run synchronize_rcu(), and make sure all pending completion is done
> > 
> > 3) run blk_mq_rq_timed_out()
> > - ret = ops->timeout
> > - blk_mq_rq_update_aborted_gstate(req, 0)
> > - blk_add_timer(req);
> > 
> > If normal completion is done between 1) and reset aborted_gstate in 3),
> > blk_mq_complete_request() will be called, and found that aborted_gstate
> > is set, then the rq won't be completed really.
> > 
> > If normal completion is done after reset aborted_gstate in 3), it should
> > be same with applying this patch.
> 
> Hello Ming,
> 
> Please keep in mind that all synchronize_rcu() does is to wait for pre-
> existing RCU readers to finish. synchronize_rcu() does not prevent that new
> rcu_read_lock() calls happen. It is e.g. possible that after

That is right, and I also mentioned normal completion can be done between
1) and reset aborted_gstate in 3).

> blk_mq_rq_update_aborted_gstate(req, 0) has been executed that a regular
> completion occurs. If that request is not reused before the timer that was
> restarted by the timeout code expires, that request will be completed twice.

In this patch, blk_mq_add_timer(req, MQ_RQ_COMPLETE, MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT) is
called for handling BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER. And after rq's state is changed
to MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT, normal completion still can come and complete this rq,
just like the above you described, right?


Thanks,
Ming

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-10 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-10  1:34 [PATCH v4] blk-mq: Fix race conditions in request timeout handling Bart Van Assche
2018-04-10  7:59 ` jianchao.wang
2018-04-10 10:04   ` Ming Lei
2018-04-10 12:04     ` Shan Hai
2018-04-10 13:01   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-10 14:32     ` jianchao.wang
2018-04-10  8:41 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-10 12:58   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-10 13:55     ` Ming Lei
2018-04-10 14:09       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-10 14:30         ` Ming Lei [this message]
2018-04-10 15:02           ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-10 15:25             ` Ming Lei
2018-04-10 15:30               ` tj
2018-04-10 15:38                 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-10 15:40                   ` tj
2018-04-10 21:33                     ` tj
2018-04-10 21:46                       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-10 21:54                         ` tj
2018-04-11 12:50                           ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-11 14:16                             ` tj
2018-04-11 18:38                             ` Martin Steigerwald
2018-04-11 14:24                           ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-11 14:43                             ` tj
2018-04-11 16:16                             ` Israel Rukshin
2018-04-11 17:07                               ` tj
2018-04-11 21:31                                 ` tj
2018-04-12  8:59                                   ` Israel Rukshin
2018-04-12 13:35                                     ` tj
2018-04-15 12:28                                       ` Israel Rukshin
2018-04-18 16:34                           ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-10  9:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-10 13:26   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-10 14:50     ` hch
2018-04-10 14:41   ` Jens Axboe
2018-04-10 14:20 ` Tejun Heo
2018-04-10 14:30   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-10 14:33     ` tj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180410143007.GB22340@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=israelr@mellanox.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox