public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	nbd@other.debian.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net,
	Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/11] loop: refactor queue limits updates
Date: Thu,  9 Jan 2025 06:57:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250109055810.1402918-11-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250109055810.1402918-1-hch@lst.de>

Replace loop_reconfigure_limits with a slightly less encompassing
loop_update_limits that expects the aller to acquire and commit the
queue limits to prepare for sorting out the freeze vs limits lock
ordering.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
---
 drivers/block/loop.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index 836a53eef4b4..560d6d5879d6 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -977,12 +977,12 @@ static unsigned int loop_default_blocksize(struct loop_device *lo,
 	return SECTOR_SIZE;
 }
 
-static int loop_reconfigure_limits(struct loop_device *lo, unsigned int bsize)
+static void loop_update_limits(struct loop_device *lo, struct queue_limits *lim,
+		unsigned int bsize)
 {
 	struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file;
 	struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
 	struct block_device *backing_bdev = NULL;
-	struct queue_limits lim;
 	u32 granularity = 0, max_discard_sectors = 0;
 
 	if (S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode))
@@ -995,22 +995,20 @@ static int loop_reconfigure_limits(struct loop_device *lo, unsigned int bsize)
 
 	loop_get_discard_config(lo, &granularity, &max_discard_sectors);
 
-	lim = queue_limits_start_update(lo->lo_queue);
-	lim.logical_block_size = bsize;
-	lim.physical_block_size = bsize;
-	lim.io_min = bsize;
-	lim.features &= ~(BLK_FEAT_WRITE_CACHE | BLK_FEAT_ROTATIONAL);
+	lim->logical_block_size = bsize;
+	lim->physical_block_size = bsize;
+	lim->io_min = bsize;
+	lim->features &= ~(BLK_FEAT_WRITE_CACHE | BLK_FEAT_ROTATIONAL);
 	if (file->f_op->fsync && !(lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_READ_ONLY))
-		lim.features |= BLK_FEAT_WRITE_CACHE;
+		lim->features |= BLK_FEAT_WRITE_CACHE;
 	if (backing_bdev && !bdev_nonrot(backing_bdev))
-		lim.features |= BLK_FEAT_ROTATIONAL;
-	lim.max_hw_discard_sectors = max_discard_sectors;
-	lim.max_write_zeroes_sectors = max_discard_sectors;
+		lim->features |= BLK_FEAT_ROTATIONAL;
+	lim->max_hw_discard_sectors = max_discard_sectors;
+	lim->max_write_zeroes_sectors = max_discard_sectors;
 	if (max_discard_sectors)
-		lim.discard_granularity = granularity;
+		lim->discard_granularity = granularity;
 	else
-		lim.discard_granularity = 0;
-	return queue_limits_commit_update(lo->lo_queue, &lim);
+		lim->discard_granularity = 0;
 }
 
 static int loop_configure(struct loop_device *lo, blk_mode_t mode,
@@ -1019,6 +1017,7 @@ static int loop_configure(struct loop_device *lo, blk_mode_t mode,
 {
 	struct file *file = fget(config->fd);
 	struct address_space *mapping;
+	struct queue_limits lim;
 	int error;
 	loff_t size;
 	bool partscan;
@@ -1090,7 +1089,9 @@ static int loop_configure(struct loop_device *lo, blk_mode_t mode,
 	lo->old_gfp_mask = mapping_gfp_mask(mapping);
 	mapping_set_gfp_mask(mapping, lo->old_gfp_mask & ~(__GFP_IO|__GFP_FS));
 
-	error = loop_reconfigure_limits(lo, config->block_size);
+	lim = queue_limits_start_update(lo->lo_queue);
+	loop_update_limits(lo, &lim, config->block_size);
+	error = queue_limits_commit_update(lo->lo_queue, &lim);
 	if (error)
 		goto out_unlock;
 
@@ -1458,6 +1459,7 @@ static int loop_set_dio(struct loop_device *lo, unsigned long arg)
 
 static int loop_set_block_size(struct loop_device *lo, unsigned long arg)
 {
+	struct queue_limits lim;
 	int err = 0;
 
 	if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound)
@@ -1470,7 +1472,9 @@ static int loop_set_block_size(struct loop_device *lo, unsigned long arg)
 	invalidate_bdev(lo->lo_device);
 
 	blk_mq_freeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
-	err = loop_reconfigure_limits(lo, arg);
+	lim = queue_limits_start_update(lo->lo_queue);
+	loop_update_limits(lo, &lim, arg);
+	err = queue_limits_commit_update(lo->lo_queue, &lim);
 	loop_update_dio(lo);
 	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
 
-- 
2.45.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-09  5:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-09  5:57 fix queue freeze and limit locking order v3 Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09  5:57 ` [PATCH 01/11] block: fix docs for freezing of queue limits updates Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09  5:57 ` [PATCH 02/11] block: add a queue_limits_commit_update_frozen helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 11:33   ` John Garry
2025-01-09  5:57 ` [PATCH 03/11] block: check BLK_FEAT_POLL under q_usage_count Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09  8:14   ` Ming Lei
2025-01-09  9:03   ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-09  5:57 ` [PATCH 04/11] block: don't update BLK_FEAT_POLL in __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09  8:16   ` Ming Lei
2025-01-09  9:01   ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-09  5:57 ` [PATCH 05/11] block: add a store_limit operations for sysfs entries Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09  5:57 ` [PATCH 06/11] block: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order in sysfs store methods Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 13:07   ` John Garry
2025-01-10  9:33     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09  5:57 ` [PATCH 07/11] nvme: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09  5:57 ` [PATCH 08/11] nbd: " Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09  5:57 ` [PATCH 09/11] usb-storage: " Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09  5:57 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-01-09  9:11   ` [PATCH 10/11] loop: refactor queue limits updates Nilay Shroff
2025-01-09  5:57 ` [PATCH 11/11] loop: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 14:57 ` fix queue freeze and limit locking order v3 Martin K. Petersen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-01-10  5:47 fix queue freeze and limit locking order v4 Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-10  5:47 ` [PATCH 10/11] loop: refactor queue limits updates Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250109055810.1402918-11-hch@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=nbd@other.debian.org \
    --cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox