From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
nbd@other.debian.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/11] loop: refactor queue limits updates
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 06:57:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250109055810.1402918-11-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250109055810.1402918-1-hch@lst.de>
Replace loop_reconfigure_limits with a slightly less encompassing
loop_update_limits that expects the aller to acquire and commit the
queue limits to prepare for sorting out the freeze vs limits lock
ordering.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
---
drivers/block/loop.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index 836a53eef4b4..560d6d5879d6 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -977,12 +977,12 @@ static unsigned int loop_default_blocksize(struct loop_device *lo,
return SECTOR_SIZE;
}
-static int loop_reconfigure_limits(struct loop_device *lo, unsigned int bsize)
+static void loop_update_limits(struct loop_device *lo, struct queue_limits *lim,
+ unsigned int bsize)
{
struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file;
struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
struct block_device *backing_bdev = NULL;
- struct queue_limits lim;
u32 granularity = 0, max_discard_sectors = 0;
if (S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode))
@@ -995,22 +995,20 @@ static int loop_reconfigure_limits(struct loop_device *lo, unsigned int bsize)
loop_get_discard_config(lo, &granularity, &max_discard_sectors);
- lim = queue_limits_start_update(lo->lo_queue);
- lim.logical_block_size = bsize;
- lim.physical_block_size = bsize;
- lim.io_min = bsize;
- lim.features &= ~(BLK_FEAT_WRITE_CACHE | BLK_FEAT_ROTATIONAL);
+ lim->logical_block_size = bsize;
+ lim->physical_block_size = bsize;
+ lim->io_min = bsize;
+ lim->features &= ~(BLK_FEAT_WRITE_CACHE | BLK_FEAT_ROTATIONAL);
if (file->f_op->fsync && !(lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_READ_ONLY))
- lim.features |= BLK_FEAT_WRITE_CACHE;
+ lim->features |= BLK_FEAT_WRITE_CACHE;
if (backing_bdev && !bdev_nonrot(backing_bdev))
- lim.features |= BLK_FEAT_ROTATIONAL;
- lim.max_hw_discard_sectors = max_discard_sectors;
- lim.max_write_zeroes_sectors = max_discard_sectors;
+ lim->features |= BLK_FEAT_ROTATIONAL;
+ lim->max_hw_discard_sectors = max_discard_sectors;
+ lim->max_write_zeroes_sectors = max_discard_sectors;
if (max_discard_sectors)
- lim.discard_granularity = granularity;
+ lim->discard_granularity = granularity;
else
- lim.discard_granularity = 0;
- return queue_limits_commit_update(lo->lo_queue, &lim);
+ lim->discard_granularity = 0;
}
static int loop_configure(struct loop_device *lo, blk_mode_t mode,
@@ -1019,6 +1017,7 @@ static int loop_configure(struct loop_device *lo, blk_mode_t mode,
{
struct file *file = fget(config->fd);
struct address_space *mapping;
+ struct queue_limits lim;
int error;
loff_t size;
bool partscan;
@@ -1090,7 +1089,9 @@ static int loop_configure(struct loop_device *lo, blk_mode_t mode,
lo->old_gfp_mask = mapping_gfp_mask(mapping);
mapping_set_gfp_mask(mapping, lo->old_gfp_mask & ~(__GFP_IO|__GFP_FS));
- error = loop_reconfigure_limits(lo, config->block_size);
+ lim = queue_limits_start_update(lo->lo_queue);
+ loop_update_limits(lo, &lim, config->block_size);
+ error = queue_limits_commit_update(lo->lo_queue, &lim);
if (error)
goto out_unlock;
@@ -1458,6 +1459,7 @@ static int loop_set_dio(struct loop_device *lo, unsigned long arg)
static int loop_set_block_size(struct loop_device *lo, unsigned long arg)
{
+ struct queue_limits lim;
int err = 0;
if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound)
@@ -1470,7 +1472,9 @@ static int loop_set_block_size(struct loop_device *lo, unsigned long arg)
invalidate_bdev(lo->lo_device);
blk_mq_freeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
- err = loop_reconfigure_limits(lo, arg);
+ lim = queue_limits_start_update(lo->lo_queue);
+ loop_update_limits(lo, &lim, arg);
+ err = queue_limits_commit_update(lo->lo_queue, &lim);
loop_update_dio(lo);
blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-09 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-09 5:57 fix queue freeze and limit locking order v3 Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 01/11] block: fix docs for freezing of queue limits updates Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 02/11] block: add a queue_limits_commit_update_frozen helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 11:33 ` John Garry
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 03/11] block: check BLK_FEAT_POLL under q_usage_count Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 8:14 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-09 9:03 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 04/11] block: don't update BLK_FEAT_POLL in __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 8:16 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-09 9:01 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 05/11] block: add a store_limit operations for sysfs entries Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 06/11] block: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order in sysfs store methods Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 13:07 ` John Garry
2025-01-10 9:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 07/11] nvme: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 08/11] nbd: " Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 09/11] usb-storage: " Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 5:57 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-01-09 9:11 ` [PATCH 10/11] loop: refactor queue limits updates Nilay Shroff
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 11/11] loop: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 14:57 ` fix queue freeze and limit locking order v3 Martin K. Petersen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-01-10 5:47 fix queue freeze and limit locking order v4 Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-10 5:47 ` [PATCH 10/11] loop: refactor queue limits updates Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250109055810.1402918-11-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=nbd@other.debian.org \
--cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox