From: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
nbd@other.debian.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] block: don't update BLK_FEAT_POLL in __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 14:31:49 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <69605291-315f-423f-aa7b-ea26b50c1065@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250109055810.1402918-5-hch@lst.de>
On 1/9/25 11:27 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> When __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues changes the number of tag sets, it
> might have to disable poll queues. Currently it does so by adjusting
> the BLK_FEAT_POLL, which is a bit against the intent of features that
> describe hardware / driver capabilities, but more importantly causes
> nasty lock order problems with the broadly held freeze when updating the
> number of hardware queues and the limits lock. Fix this by leaving
> BLK_FEAT_POLL alone, and instead check for the number of poll queues in
> the bio submission and poll handlers. While this adds extra work to the
> fast path, the variables are in cache lines used by these operations
> anyway, so it should be cheap enough.
>
> Fixes: 8023e144f9d6 ("block: move the poll flag to queue_limits")
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Looks good to me, also with this new change in v3, I re-tested use case:
When a driver announces the support of polled I/O during initialization
and later resizing the queue so that there's no poll queue left. Both
these cases works fine. So:
Reviewed-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-09 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-09 5:57 fix queue freeze and limit locking order v3 Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 01/11] block: fix docs for freezing of queue limits updates Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 02/11] block: add a queue_limits_commit_update_frozen helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 11:33 ` John Garry
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 03/11] block: check BLK_FEAT_POLL under q_usage_count Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 8:14 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-09 9:03 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 04/11] block: don't update BLK_FEAT_POLL in __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 8:16 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-09 9:01 ` Nilay Shroff [this message]
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 05/11] block: add a store_limit operations for sysfs entries Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 06/11] block: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order in sysfs store methods Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 13:07 ` John Garry
2025-01-10 9:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 07/11] nvme: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 08/11] nbd: " Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 09/11] usb-storage: " Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 10/11] loop: refactor queue limits updates Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 9:11 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 11/11] loop: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 14:57 ` fix queue freeze and limit locking order v3 Martin K. Petersen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-01-10 5:47 fix queue freeze and limit locking order v4 Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-10 5:47 ` [PATCH 04/11] block: don't update BLK_FEAT_POLL in __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=69605291-315f-423f-aa7b-ea26b50c1065@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=nbd@other.debian.org \
--cc=usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox