* Question about asynchronous blk-mq tag waiting for io_uring
@ 2026-10-08 21:41 Maks
2026-10-17 17:42 ` Maks Ivanov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Maks @ 2026-10-08 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: axboe; +Cc: Maks Ivanov, io-uring, linux-block
From: Maks Ivanov <mi9992828@gmail.com>
Hi,
I read your comment in liburing issue #1492 about callback-based retry
when storage tags are exhausted:
https://github.com/axboe/liburing/issues/1492#issuecomment-4696489936
I'm considering this direction for my bachelor's thesis and would like
to clarify its scope and design.
The initial scope would be io_uring direct reads on raw block devices.
For requests without explicit RWF_NOWAIT, the mechanism would register
a continuation when tag allocation cannot complete immediately, then
retry submission when a tag becomes available.
Explicit RWF_NOWAIT requests would retain their existing
behaviour when tag allocation would require waiting.
Could you clarify a few points?
- Is this still an open direction worth investigating?
- Is there related work or an existing approach I should look at first?
- Which layer should own the continuation: io_uring, the block submission
path, or blk-mq?
- What lifetime and cancellation constraints would such a mechanism need
to satisfy?
I would also appreciate pointers to other open problems in io_uring or
the block layer that could suit a focused implementation and validation
project. Existing bug reports, design discussions, or TODOs would be
very helpful.
Thanks,
Maks Ivanov
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-17 17:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-08 21:41 Question about asynchronous blk-mq tag waiting for io_uring Maks
2026-10-17 17:42 ` Maks Ivanov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox