From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
shawn.lin@rock-chips.com,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com>, Chris Leech <cleech@redhat.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/14] mmc: complete requests from ->timeout
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 22:55:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4625bce6-0f93-ef84-0d55-b084f37c97ce@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180529135239.27005-11-hch@lst.de>
[+ Ulf, Adrian, linux-mmc, as linux-mmc and folks are missing in the
recipient list.]
On 2018/5/29 21:52, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> By completing the request entirely in the driver we can remove the
> BLK_EH_HANDLED return value and thus the split responsibility between the
> driver and the block layer that has been causing trouble.
>
> [While this keeps existing behavior it seems to mismatch the comment,
> maintainers please chime in!]
The comment means the timeout doesn't happen for the current in-flight
request which command queue is doing, and the request is finished
previously(correct me if I'm wrong). So mmc defers the complete stuff to
blk_timeout_work to help. Maybe the comment should gone as well.
Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/core/queue.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
> index 56e9a803db21..648eb6743ed5 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
> @@ -111,8 +111,9 @@ static enum blk_eh_timer_return mmc_cqe_timed_out(struct request *req)
> __mmc_cqe_recovery_notifier(mq);
> return BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER;
> }
> - /* No timeout */
> - return BLK_EH_HANDLED;
> + /* No timeout (XXX: huh? comment doesn't make much sense) */
> + blk_mq_complete_request(req);
> + return BLK_EH_DONE;
> default:
> /* Timeout is handled by mmc core */
> return BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER;
>
--
Best Regards
Shawn Lin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-29 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-29 13:52 drop abort sequence, kill BLK_EH_HANDLED v2 Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH 01/14] libata: remove ata_scsi_timed_out Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH 02/14] blk-mq: Fix timeout and state order Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH 03/14] blk-mq: Remove generation seqeunce Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-04 6:56 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-06-04 13:42 ` hch
2018-06-04 14:13 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH 04/14] block: rename BLK_EH_NOT_HANDLED to BLK_EH_DONE Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH 05/14] nvme: return BLK_EH_DONE from ->timeout Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH 06/14] nbd: complete requests " Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH 07/14] mtip32xx: " Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-29 14:17 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH 08/14] null_blk: " Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH 09/14] scsi_transport_fc: " Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH 10/14] mmc: " Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-29 14:55 ` Shawn Lin [this message]
2018-05-30 8:09 ` Adrian Hunter
2018-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH 11/14] libiscsi: don't try to bypass SCSI EH Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-30 1:04 ` Lee Duncan
2018-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH 12/14] block: remove BLK_EH_HANDLED Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-29 14:17 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH 13/14] block: document the blk_eh_timer_return values Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-29 14:17 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH 14/14] blk-mq: simplify blk_mq_rq_timed_out Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-29 14:19 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-05-29 15:12 ` drop abort sequence, kill BLK_EH_HANDLED v2 Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4625bce6-0f93-ef84-0d55-b084f37c97ce@rock-chips.com \
--to=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=cleech@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=lduncan@suse.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox