Linux block layer
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, nbd@other.debian.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] nbd: fix NULL pointer dereference in nbd_pending_cmd_work()
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 09:02:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <616f687a-417e-4fd5-b0dc-9bd519db3920@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e43373f-9202-4fa7-b0c8-f1bc80fd81de@acm.org>

Hi Bart,

On 9/28/26 10:19 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 9/28/26 2:10 AM, Joseph Qi wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c
>> index c2c3dbdd631f..9909774dbfbb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/block/nbd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c
>> @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ struct nbd_sock {
>>       int fallback_index;
>>       int cookie;
>>       struct work_struct work;
>> +    struct request *partial_req;
>>   };
>>     struct recv_thread_args {
>> @@ -637,12 +638,24 @@ static void nbd_sched_pending_work(struct nbd_device *nbd,
>>   {
>>       struct request *req = blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(cmd);
>>   -    /* pending work should be scheduled only once */
>> -    WARN_ON_ONCE(test_bit(NBD_CMD_PARTIAL_SEND, &cmd->flags));
>> -
>>       nsock->pending = req;
>>       nsock->sent = sent;
>> -    set_bit(NBD_CMD_PARTIAL_SEND, &cmd->flags);
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * Already armed: this is nbd_pending_cmd_work() re-entering because the
>> +     * resumed send was interrupted again.  Its work is still running, so
>> +     * just refresh the resume point above and let its loop pick it up
>> +     * instead of taking another config reference and requeueing the work.
>> +     */
>> +    if (test_and_set_bit(NBD_CMD_PARTIAL_SEND, &cmd->flags))
>> +        return;
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * nbd_mark_nsock_dead() clears ->pending, so the work function cannot
>> +     * rely on it to find the request it owns.  Keep a copy that only it
>> +     * clears.
>> +     */
>> +    nsock->partial_req = req;
>>       refcount_inc(&nbd->config_refs);
>>       schedule_work(&nsock->work);
>>   }
>> @@ -817,11 +830,12 @@ static blk_status_t nbd_send_cmd(struct nbd_device *nbd, struct nbd_cmd *cmd,
>>   static void nbd_pending_cmd_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>   {
>>       struct nbd_sock *nsock = container_of(work, struct nbd_sock, work);
>> -    struct request *req = nsock->pending;
>> +    struct request *req = nsock->partial_req;
>>       struct nbd_cmd *cmd = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
>>       struct nbd_device *nbd = cmd->nbd;
>>       unsigned long deadline = READ_ONCE(req->deadline);
>>       unsigned int wait_ms = 2;
>> +    bool complete = false;
>>         mutex_lock(&cmd->lock);
>>   @@ -830,6 +844,18 @@ static void nbd_pending_cmd_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>           goto out;
>>         mutex_lock(&nsock->tx_lock);
>> +    /*
>> +     * nbd_mark_nsock_dead() can tear the socket down between schedule_work()
>> +     * and here, and it clears ->pending and ->sent.  The header is already
>> +     * on the wire so this request can never be answered; fail it rather than
>> +     * resuming a send on a socket that is gone.
>> +     */
>> +    if (!nsock->pending) {
>> +        cmd->status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
>> +        __clear_bit(NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT, &cmd->flags);
>> +        complete = true;
>> +        goto unlock;
>> +    }
>>       while (true) {
>>           nbd_send_cmd(nbd, cmd, cmd->index);
>>           if (!nsock->pending)
>> @@ -846,16 +872,36 @@ static void nbd_pending_cmd_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>                * nbd_handle_cmd() requeue every later request forever.
>>                */
>>               nbd_mark_nsock_dead(nbd, nsock, 1);
>> -            blk_mq_complete_request(req);
>> +            complete = true;
>>               break;
>>           }
>>           msleep(wait_ms);
>>           wait_ms *= 2;
>>       }
>> +unlock:
>> +    /*
>> +     * nbd_sched_pending_work() writes partial_req under tx_lock, and
>> +     * cmd->lock is per-command, so this has to be under tx_lock too.
>> +     */
>> +    nsock->partial_req = NULL;
>>       mutex_unlock(&nsock->tx_lock);
>>       clear_bit(NBD_CMD_PARTIAL_SEND, &cmd->flags);
>>   out:
>>       mutex_unlock(&cmd->lock);
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * Complete before nbd_config_put(): if this is the last config
>> +     * reference, nbd_put() runs nbd_dev_remove() inline unless
>> +     * NBD_DESTROY_ON_DISCONNECT is set, and del_gendisk() would then wait
>> +     * in blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait() for the q_usage_counter that this
>> +     * request holds until it is completed.  The config reference is what
>> +     * keeps nbd itself alive across the completion, but cmd must not be
>> +     * touched afterwards, since nbd_complete_rq() may run inline and ends
>> +     * the request without taking cmd->lock.
>> +     */
>> +    if (complete)
>> +        blk_mq_complete_request(req);
>> +
>>       nbd_config_put(nbd);
>>   }
>>   
> 
> These changes add significant complexity and hence make the NBD driver
> harder to maintain. Has it been considered to increase the request
> reference count while nsock->pending != NULL? See also req_ref_inc_not_zero() and blk_mq_put_rq_ref().
> 

Thanks for taking a look.

It seems a request reference can't replace the extra pointer, since the
two answer different questions.

A reference keeps the request object alive, but it doesn't stop
nsock->pending from being cleared, which is what breaks the worker:

  nbd_mark_nsock_dead()
    nsock->dead = true;
    nsock->pending = NULL;
    nsock->sent = 0;

  nbd_pending_cmd_work()
    struct request *req = nsock->pending;
    struct nbd_cmd *cmd = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
    struct nbd_device *nbd = cmd->nbd;

Nothing between schedule_work() and the worker starting takes a lock the
teardown path also takes, so pinning the request still leaves the worker
reading NULL from ->pending and faulting on cmd->nbd.

Thanks,
Joseph


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-29  1:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-28  9:10 [PATCH v2 1/2] nbd: mark the socket dead when a partial send times out Joseph Qi
2026-09-28  9:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] nbd: fix NULL pointer dereference in nbd_pending_cmd_work() Joseph Qi
2026-09-28 14:19   ` Bart Van Assche
2026-09-29  1:02     ` Joseph Qi [this message]
2026-10-08  7:22       ` Joseph Qi
2026-09-28 14:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] nbd: mark the socket dead when a partial send times out Bart Van Assche
2026-09-29  9:03 ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=616f687a-417e-4fd5-b0dc-9bd519db3920@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nbd@other.debian.org \
    --cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox