From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, nbd@other.debian.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] nbd: fix NULL pointer dereference in nbd_pending_cmd_work()
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2026 15:22:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a5d8f09-2388-4cc3-9012-884718c813de@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <616f687a-417e-4fd5-b0dc-9bd519db3920@linux.alibaba.com>
Hi,
On 9/29/26 9:02 AM, Joseph Qi wrote:
> Hi Bart,
>
> On 9/28/26 10:19 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 9/28/26 2:10 AM, Joseph Qi wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c
>>> index c2c3dbdd631f..9909774dbfbb 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/block/nbd.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c
>>> @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ struct nbd_sock {
>>> int fallback_index;
>>> int cookie;
>>> struct work_struct work;
>>> + struct request *partial_req;
>>> };
>>> struct recv_thread_args {
>>> @@ -637,12 +638,24 @@ static void nbd_sched_pending_work(struct nbd_device *nbd,
>>> {
>>> struct request *req = blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(cmd);
>>> - /* pending work should be scheduled only once */
>>> - WARN_ON_ONCE(test_bit(NBD_CMD_PARTIAL_SEND, &cmd->flags));
>>> -
>>> nsock->pending = req;
>>> nsock->sent = sent;
>>> - set_bit(NBD_CMD_PARTIAL_SEND, &cmd->flags);
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Already armed: this is nbd_pending_cmd_work() re-entering because the
>>> + * resumed send was interrupted again. Its work is still running, so
>>> + * just refresh the resume point above and let its loop pick it up
>>> + * instead of taking another config reference and requeueing the work.
>>> + */
>>> + if (test_and_set_bit(NBD_CMD_PARTIAL_SEND, &cmd->flags))
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * nbd_mark_nsock_dead() clears ->pending, so the work function cannot
>>> + * rely on it to find the request it owns. Keep a copy that only it
>>> + * clears.
>>> + */
>>> + nsock->partial_req = req;
>>> refcount_inc(&nbd->config_refs);
>>> schedule_work(&nsock->work);
>>> }
>>> @@ -817,11 +830,12 @@ static blk_status_t nbd_send_cmd(struct nbd_device *nbd, struct nbd_cmd *cmd,
>>> static void nbd_pending_cmd_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>> {
>>> struct nbd_sock *nsock = container_of(work, struct nbd_sock, work);
>>> - struct request *req = nsock->pending;
>>> + struct request *req = nsock->partial_req;
>>> struct nbd_cmd *cmd = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
>>> struct nbd_device *nbd = cmd->nbd;
>>> unsigned long deadline = READ_ONCE(req->deadline);
>>> unsigned int wait_ms = 2;
>>> + bool complete = false;
>>> mutex_lock(&cmd->lock);
>>> @@ -830,6 +844,18 @@ static void nbd_pending_cmd_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>> goto out;
>>> mutex_lock(&nsock->tx_lock);
>>> + /*
>>> + * nbd_mark_nsock_dead() can tear the socket down between schedule_work()
>>> + * and here, and it clears ->pending and ->sent. The header is already
>>> + * on the wire so this request can never be answered; fail it rather than
>>> + * resuming a send on a socket that is gone.
>>> + */
>>> + if (!nsock->pending) {
>>> + cmd->status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
>>> + __clear_bit(NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT, &cmd->flags);
>>> + complete = true;
>>> + goto unlock;
>>> + }
>>> while (true) {
>>> nbd_send_cmd(nbd, cmd, cmd->index);
>>> if (!nsock->pending)
>>> @@ -846,16 +872,36 @@ static void nbd_pending_cmd_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>> * nbd_handle_cmd() requeue every later request forever.
>>> */
>>> nbd_mark_nsock_dead(nbd, nsock, 1);
>>> - blk_mq_complete_request(req);
>>> + complete = true;
>>> break;
>>> }
>>> msleep(wait_ms);
>>> wait_ms *= 2;
>>> }
>>> +unlock:
>>> + /*
>>> + * nbd_sched_pending_work() writes partial_req under tx_lock, and
>>> + * cmd->lock is per-command, so this has to be under tx_lock too.
>>> + */
>>> + nsock->partial_req = NULL;
>>> mutex_unlock(&nsock->tx_lock);
>>> clear_bit(NBD_CMD_PARTIAL_SEND, &cmd->flags);
>>> out:
>>> mutex_unlock(&cmd->lock);
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Complete before nbd_config_put(): if this is the last config
>>> + * reference, nbd_put() runs nbd_dev_remove() inline unless
>>> + * NBD_DESTROY_ON_DISCONNECT is set, and del_gendisk() would then wait
>>> + * in blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait() for the q_usage_counter that this
>>> + * request holds until it is completed. The config reference is what
>>> + * keeps nbd itself alive across the completion, but cmd must not be
>>> + * touched afterwards, since nbd_complete_rq() may run inline and ends
>>> + * the request without taking cmd->lock.
>>> + */
>>> + if (complete)
>>> + blk_mq_complete_request(req);
>>> +
>>> nbd_config_put(nbd);
>>> }
>>>
>>
>> These changes add significant complexity and hence make the NBD driver
>> harder to maintain. Has it been considered to increase the request
>> reference count while nsock->pending != NULL? See also req_ref_inc_not_zero() and blk_mq_put_rq_ref().
>>
>
> Thanks for taking a look.
>
> It seems a request reference can't replace the extra pointer, since the
> two answer different questions.
>
> A reference keeps the request object alive, but it doesn't stop
> nsock->pending from being cleared, which is what breaks the worker:
>
> nbd_mark_nsock_dead()
> nsock->dead = true;
> nsock->pending = NULL;
> nsock->sent = 0;
>
> nbd_pending_cmd_work()
> struct request *req = nsock->pending;
> struct nbd_cmd *cmd = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
> struct nbd_device *nbd = cmd->nbd;
>
> Nothing between schedule_work() and the worker starting takes a lock the
> teardown path also takes, so pinning the request still leaves the worker
> reading NULL from ->pending and faulting on cmd->nbd.
>
Any more comments on this? Or am I missing something?
Thanks,
Joseph
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-08 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 9:10 [PATCH v2 1/2] nbd: mark the socket dead when a partial send times out Joseph Qi
2026-09-28 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] nbd: fix NULL pointer dereference in nbd_pending_cmd_work() Joseph Qi
2026-09-28 14:19 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-09-29 1:02 ` Joseph Qi
2026-10-08 7:22 ` Joseph Qi [this message]
2026-09-28 14:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] nbd: mark the socket dead when a partial send times out Bart Van Assche
2026-09-29 9:03 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8a5d8f09-2388-4cc3-9012-884718c813de@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@other.debian.org \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox