From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, nbd@other.debian.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] nbd: fix NULL pointer dereference in nbd_pending_cmd_work()
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 07:19:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e43373f-9202-4fa7-b0c8-f1bc80fd81de@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260928091021.2456652-2-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
On 9/28/26 2:10 AM, Joseph Qi wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c
> index c2c3dbdd631f..9909774dbfbb 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/nbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c
> @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ struct nbd_sock {
> int fallback_index;
> int cookie;
> struct work_struct work;
> + struct request *partial_req;
> };
>
> struct recv_thread_args {
> @@ -637,12 +638,24 @@ static void nbd_sched_pending_work(struct nbd_device *nbd,
> {
> struct request *req = blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(cmd);
>
> - /* pending work should be scheduled only once */
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(test_bit(NBD_CMD_PARTIAL_SEND, &cmd->flags));
> -
> nsock->pending = req;
> nsock->sent = sent;
> - set_bit(NBD_CMD_PARTIAL_SEND, &cmd->flags);
> +
> + /*
> + * Already armed: this is nbd_pending_cmd_work() re-entering because the
> + * resumed send was interrupted again. Its work is still running, so
> + * just refresh the resume point above and let its loop pick it up
> + * instead of taking another config reference and requeueing the work.
> + */
> + if (test_and_set_bit(NBD_CMD_PARTIAL_SEND, &cmd->flags))
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * nbd_mark_nsock_dead() clears ->pending, so the work function cannot
> + * rely on it to find the request it owns. Keep a copy that only it
> + * clears.
> + */
> + nsock->partial_req = req;
> refcount_inc(&nbd->config_refs);
> schedule_work(&nsock->work);
> }
> @@ -817,11 +830,12 @@ static blk_status_t nbd_send_cmd(struct nbd_device *nbd, struct nbd_cmd *cmd,
> static void nbd_pending_cmd_work(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> struct nbd_sock *nsock = container_of(work, struct nbd_sock, work);
> - struct request *req = nsock->pending;
> + struct request *req = nsock->partial_req;
> struct nbd_cmd *cmd = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
> struct nbd_device *nbd = cmd->nbd;
> unsigned long deadline = READ_ONCE(req->deadline);
> unsigned int wait_ms = 2;
> + bool complete = false;
>
> mutex_lock(&cmd->lock);
>
> @@ -830,6 +844,18 @@ static void nbd_pending_cmd_work(struct work_struct *work)
> goto out;
>
> mutex_lock(&nsock->tx_lock);
> + /*
> + * nbd_mark_nsock_dead() can tear the socket down between schedule_work()
> + * and here, and it clears ->pending and ->sent. The header is already
> + * on the wire so this request can never be answered; fail it rather than
> + * resuming a send on a socket that is gone.
> + */
> + if (!nsock->pending) {
> + cmd->status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
> + __clear_bit(NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT, &cmd->flags);
> + complete = true;
> + goto unlock;
> + }
> while (true) {
> nbd_send_cmd(nbd, cmd, cmd->index);
> if (!nsock->pending)
> @@ -846,16 +872,36 @@ static void nbd_pending_cmd_work(struct work_struct *work)
> * nbd_handle_cmd() requeue every later request forever.
> */
> nbd_mark_nsock_dead(nbd, nsock, 1);
> - blk_mq_complete_request(req);
> + complete = true;
> break;
> }
> msleep(wait_ms);
> wait_ms *= 2;
> }
> +unlock:
> + /*
> + * nbd_sched_pending_work() writes partial_req under tx_lock, and
> + * cmd->lock is per-command, so this has to be under tx_lock too.
> + */
> + nsock->partial_req = NULL;
> mutex_unlock(&nsock->tx_lock);
> clear_bit(NBD_CMD_PARTIAL_SEND, &cmd->flags);
> out:
> mutex_unlock(&cmd->lock);
> +
> + /*
> + * Complete before nbd_config_put(): if this is the last config
> + * reference, nbd_put() runs nbd_dev_remove() inline unless
> + * NBD_DESTROY_ON_DISCONNECT is set, and del_gendisk() would then wait
> + * in blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait() for the q_usage_counter that this
> + * request holds until it is completed. The config reference is what
> + * keeps nbd itself alive across the completion, but cmd must not be
> + * touched afterwards, since nbd_complete_rq() may run inline and ends
> + * the request without taking cmd->lock.
> + */
> + if (complete)
> + blk_mq_complete_request(req);
> +
> nbd_config_put(nbd);
> }
>
These changes add significant complexity and hence make the NBD driver
harder to maintain. Has it been considered to increase the request
reference count while nsock->pending != NULL? See also
req_ref_inc_not_zero() and blk_mq_put_rq_ref().
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-28 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 9:10 [PATCH v2 1/2] nbd: mark the socket dead when a partial send times out Joseph Qi
2026-09-28 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] nbd: fix NULL pointer dereference in nbd_pending_cmd_work() Joseph Qi
2026-09-28 14:19 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2026-09-29 1:02 ` Joseph Qi
2026-10-08 7:22 ` Joseph Qi
2026-09-28 14:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] nbd: mark the socket dead when a partial send times out Bart Van Assche
2026-09-29 9:03 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9e43373f-9202-4fa7-b0c8-f1bc80fd81de@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@other.debian.org \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox