Re: [Bluez-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND] make bluez GNOME UIs singletons

[Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>]

On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 20:58 +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> 
> >         patch looks good to me. One question though, why do we use the
> >         extra
> >         register function. Can't we include that in the _new function.
> >         This
> >         would make the code a little simpler. We still have to check
> >         if the 
> >         object creation succeeded.
> >
> > This would require defining GObject properties and get and set
> > operations.  Also, the register function is what actually initiates
> > the connection to the bus and requests the bus name.  This sort of
> > operation might fail and shouldn't be done in an object constructor.
> > The register function seemed like the simplest solution. 
> 
> I did it the way I think it should be done to make it a lot simpler. It
> works, but I am not sure if it is the best way. Feel free to improve it.
> The stuff is in the CVS now.

Chris is right, object creation should never fail.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services
for just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel