From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Mat Martineau <mathewm@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, gustavo@padovan.org,
sunnyk@codeaurora.org, andrei.emeltchenko.news@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 10/18] Bluetooth: Add logical link confirm
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:08:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1350594530.2026.18.camel@aeonflux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350583130-3241-11-git-send-email-mathewm@codeaurora.org>
Hi Mat,
> The logical link confirm callback is executed when the AMP controller
> completes its logical link setup. During a channel move, a newly
> formed logical link allows a move responder to send a move channel
> response. A move initiator will send a move channel confirm. A
> failed logical link will end the channel move and send an appropriate
> response or confirm command indicating a failure.
>
> If the channel is being created on an AMP controller, L2CAP
> configuration is started after the logical link is set up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathewm@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 118 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
> index 7e50aa4..8e50685 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
> @@ -3799,6 +3799,7 @@ static inline int l2cap_config_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn,
> goto unlock;
> }
>
> + chan->ident = cmd->ident;
> l2cap_send_cmd(conn, cmd->ident, L2CAP_CONF_RSP, len, rsp);
> chan->num_conf_rsp++;
>
> @@ -4241,11 +4242,126 @@ static void l2cap_send_move_chan_cfm_rsp(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 ident,
> l2cap_send_cmd(conn, ident, L2CAP_MOVE_CHAN_CFM_RSP, sizeof(rsp), &rsp);
> }
>
> +static void l2cap_logical_fail(struct l2cap_chan *chan)
> +{
> + /* Logical link setup failed */
> + if (chan->state != BT_CONNECTED) {
> + /* Create channel failure, disconnect */
> + l2cap_send_disconn_req(chan->conn, chan, ECONNRESET);
goto done;
And then the chan->move_role as switch statement?
> + } else if (chan->move_role == L2CAP_MOVE_ROLE_RESPONDER) {
> + l2cap_move_revert(chan);
> + chan->move_role = L2CAP_MOVE_ROLE_NONE;
> + chan->move_state = L2CAP_MOVE_STABLE;
> + l2cap_send_move_chan_rsp(chan->conn, chan->ident, chan->dcid,
> + L2CAP_MR_NOT_SUPP);
> + } else if (chan->move_role == L2CAP_MOVE_ROLE_INITIATOR) {
> + if (chan->move_state == L2CAP_MOVE_WAIT_LOGICAL_COMP ||
> + chan->move_state == L2CAP_MOVE_WAIT_LOGICAL_CFM) {
> + /* Remote has only sent pending or
> + * success responses, clean up
> + */
> + l2cap_move_revert(chan);
> + chan->move_role = L2CAP_MOVE_ROLE_NONE;
> + chan->move_state = L2CAP_MOVE_STABLE;
> + }
> +
> + /* Other amp move states imply that the move
> + * has already aborted
> + */
> + l2cap_send_move_chan_cfm(chan->conn, chan, chan->scid,
> + L2CAP_MC_UNCONFIRMED);
> + __set_chan_timer(chan, L2CAP_MOVE_TIMEOUT);
> + }
> +
done:
/* cleanup ... */
> + chan->hs_hchan = NULL;
> + chan->hs_hcon = NULL;
> +
> + /* Placeholder - free logical link */
> +}
> +
> +static void l2cap_logical_create_channel(struct l2cap_chan *chan,
> + struct hci_chan *hchan)
> +{
> + struct l2cap_conf_rsp rsp;
> + u8 code;
> +
> + chan->hs_hcon = hchan->conn;
> + chan->hs_hcon->l2cap_data = chan->conn;
> +
> + code = l2cap_build_conf_rsp(chan, &rsp,
> + L2CAP_CONF_SUCCESS, 0);
> + l2cap_send_cmd(chan->conn, chan->ident, L2CAP_CONF_RSP, code,
> + &rsp);
> + set_bit(CONF_OUTPUT_DONE, &chan->conf_state);
> +
> + if (test_bit(CONF_INPUT_DONE, &chan->conf_state)) {
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + set_default_fcs(chan);
> +
> + err = l2cap_ertm_init(chan);
> + if (err < 0)
> + l2cap_send_disconn_req(chan->conn, chan, -err);
> + else
> + l2cap_chan_ready(chan);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void l2cap_logical_move_channel(struct l2cap_chan *chan,
> + struct hci_chan *hchan)
> +{
> + chan->hs_hcon = hchan->conn;
> + chan->hs_hcon->l2cap_data = chan->conn;
> +
> + BT_DBG("move_state %d", chan->move_state);
> +
> + switch (chan->move_state) {
> + case L2CAP_MOVE_WAIT_LOGICAL_COMP:
> + /* Move confirm will be sent after a success
> + * response is received
> + */
> + chan->move_state = L2CAP_MOVE_WAIT_RSP_SUCCESS;
> + break;
> + case L2CAP_MOVE_WAIT_LOGICAL_CFM:
> + if (test_bit(CONN_LOCAL_BUSY, &chan->conn_state)) {
> + chan->move_state = L2CAP_MOVE_WAIT_LOCAL_BUSY;
> + } else if (chan->move_role == L2CAP_MOVE_ROLE_INITIATOR) {
> + chan->move_state = L2CAP_MOVE_WAIT_CONFIRM_RSP;
> + l2cap_send_move_chan_cfm(chan->conn, chan, chan->scid,
> + L2CAP_MR_SUCCESS);
> + __set_chan_timer(chan, L2CAP_MOVE_TIMEOUT);
> + } else if (chan->move_role == L2CAP_MOVE_ROLE_RESPONDER) {
> + chan->move_state = L2CAP_MOVE_WAIT_CONFIRM;
> + l2cap_send_move_chan_rsp(chan->conn, chan->ident,
> + chan->dcid, L2CAP_MR_SUCCESS);
Is the any chance to create a generic helper for the send_move_chan_*
for both roles. I have seen this snipped a few times.
> + }
> + break;
> + default:
> + /* Move was not in expected state, free the channel */
> + chan->hs_hchan = NULL;
> + chan->hs_hcon = NULL;
> +
> + /* Placeholder - free the logical link */
Maybe centralizing this is a helper function. Or do we expect something
different here.
> +
> + chan->move_state = L2CAP_MOVE_STABLE;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/* Call with chan locked */
> static void l2cap_logical_cfm(struct l2cap_chan *chan, struct hci_chan *hchan,
> u8 status)
> {
> - /* Placeholder */
> - return;
> + BT_DBG("chan %p, hchan %p, status %d", chan, hchan, status);
> +
> + if (status) {
> + l2cap_logical_fail(chan);
> + } else if (chan->state != BT_CONNECTED) {
> + /* Ignore logical link if channel is on BR/EDR */
> + if (chan->local_amp_id)
> + l2cap_logical_create_channel(chan, hchan);
> + } else {
> + l2cap_logical_move_channel(chan, hchan);
> + }
> }
>
> static inline int l2cap_move_channel_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn,
Regards
Marcel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-18 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-18 17:58 [PATCHv3 00/18] L2CAP signaling for AMP channel create/move Mat Martineau
2012-10-18 17:58 ` [PATCHv3 01/18] Bluetooth: Add new l2cap_chan struct members for high speed channels Mat Martineau
2012-10-18 17:58 ` [PATCHv3 02/18] Bluetooth: Add L2CAP create channel request handling Mat Martineau
2012-10-18 17:58 ` [PATCHv3 03/18] Bluetooth: Remove unnecessary intermediate function Mat Martineau
2012-10-19 7:56 ` Andrei Emeltchenko
2012-10-18 17:58 ` [PATCHv3 04/18] Bluetooth: Lookup channel structure based on DCID Mat Martineau
2012-10-19 7:57 ` Andrei Emeltchenko
2012-10-18 17:58 ` [PATCHv3 05/18] Bluetooth: Channel move request handling Mat Martineau
2012-10-19 8:00 ` Andrei Emeltchenko
2012-10-18 17:58 ` [PATCHv3 06/18] Bluetooth: Add new ERTM receive states for channel move Mat Martineau
2012-10-19 8:06 ` Andrei Emeltchenko
2012-10-18 17:58 ` [PATCHv3 07/18] Bluetooth: Add move channel confirm handling Mat Martineau
2012-10-18 21:03 ` Marcel Holtmann
2012-10-19 8:07 ` Andrei Emeltchenko
2012-10-18 17:58 ` [PATCHv3 08/18] Bluetooth: Add state to hci_chan Mat Martineau
2012-10-19 8:08 ` Andrei Emeltchenko
2012-10-18 17:58 ` [PATCHv3 09/18] Bluetooth: Move channel response Mat Martineau
2012-10-18 21:05 ` Marcel Holtmann
2012-10-18 17:58 ` [PATCHv3 10/18] Bluetooth: Add logical link confirm Mat Martineau
2012-10-18 21:08 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2012-10-19 21:21 ` Mat Martineau
2012-10-19 7:53 ` Andrei Emeltchenko
2012-10-19 16:44 ` Mat Martineau
2012-10-18 17:58 ` [PATCHv3 11/18] Bluetooth: Add move confirm response handling Mat Martineau
2012-10-19 8:25 ` Andrei Emeltchenko
2012-10-18 17:58 ` [PATCHv3 12/18] Bluetooth: Handle physical link completion Mat Martineau
2012-10-19 8:32 ` Andrei Emeltchenko
2012-10-18 17:58 ` [PATCHv3 13/18] Bluetooth: Flag ACL frames as complete for AMP controllers Mat Martineau
2012-10-19 8:44 ` Andrei Emeltchenko
2012-10-18 17:58 ` [PATCHv3 14/18] Bluetooth: Do not send data during channel move Mat Martineau
2012-10-19 8:45 ` Andrei Emeltchenko
2012-10-18 17:58 ` [PATCHv3 15/18] Bluetooth: Configure appropriate timeouts for AMP controllers Mat Martineau
2012-10-18 17:58 ` [PATCHv3 16/18] Bluetooth: Ignore BR/EDR packet size constraints when fragmenting for AMP Mat Martineau
2012-10-18 17:58 ` [PATCHv3 17/18] Bluetooth: Do not retransmit data during a channel move Mat Martineau
2012-10-19 8:48 ` Andrei Emeltchenko
2012-10-18 17:58 ` [PATCHv3 18/18] Bluetooth: Start channel move when socket option is changed Mat Martineau
2012-10-19 9:37 ` Andrei Emeltchenko
2012-10-19 16:16 ` Mat Martineau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1350594530.2026.18.camel@aeonflux \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=andrei.emeltchenko.news@gmail.com \
--cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathewm@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sunnyk@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox