public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: damenly.su@gmail.com
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Su Yue <Damenly_Su@gmx.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] btrfs: metadata uuid fixes and enhancements
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 19:01:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191212110132.11063-1-Damenly_Su@gmx.com> (raw)

From: Su Yue <Damenly_Su@gmx.com>

This patchset fixes one reproducible bug and add two split-brain
cases ignored.

The origin code thinks the final state of successful synced device is
always has INCOMPAT_METADATA_UUID feature. However, a device without
the feature flag can be the one pull into disk. This is what handled
in the patchset. Test images are added in btrfs-progs part.

Patch[1] fixes a bug about wrong fsid copy.
Patch[2] is for the later patches.
Patch[3-5] add the forgotten cases.
Patch[6] just does simple code movement for grace.

The set passes xfstests-dev without regressions.

Su Yue (6):
  btrfs: metadata_uuid: fix failed assertion due to unsuccessful device
    scan
  btrfs: metadata_uuid: move split-brain handling from fs_id() to new
    function
  btrfs: split-brain case for scanned changing device with
    INCOMPAT_METADATA_UUID
  btrfs: split-brain case for scanned changed device without
    INCOMPAT_METADATA_UUID
  btrfs: copy fsid and metadata_uuid for pulled disk without
    INCOMPAT_METADATA_UUID
  btrfs: metadata_uuid: move partly logic into find_fsid_inprogress()

 fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 193 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 125 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)

-- 
2.24.0


             reply	other threads:[~2019-12-12 11:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-12 11:01 damenly.su [this message]
2019-12-12 11:01 ` [PATCH 1/6] btrfs: metadata_uuid: fix failed assertion due to unsuccessful device scan damenly.su
2019-12-12 14:15   ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-12-13  2:30     ` Su Yue
2019-12-13  2:46     ` [PATCH 1/6] btrfs: metadata_uuid: fix failed assertion due to unsuccessful device scan (reformatted) Su Yue
2019-12-13  5:36       ` Anand Jain
2019-12-13  7:15         ` Su Yue
2019-12-13  8:51           ` Anand Jain
2019-12-13 10:10             ` Su Yue
2019-12-12 11:01 ` [PATCH 2/6] btrfs: metadata_uuid: move split-brain handling from fs_id() to new function damenly.su
2019-12-12 13:05   ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-12-12 13:32     ` Su Yue
2019-12-12 11:01 ` [PATCH 3/6] btrfs: split-brain case for scanned changing device with INCOMPAT_METADATA_UUID damenly.su
2019-12-12 13:24   ` Su Yue
2019-12-12 13:34   ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-12-12 14:19     ` Su Yue
2019-12-12 11:01 ` [PATCH 4/6] btrfs: split-brain case for scanned changed device without INCOMPAT_METADATA_UUID damenly.su
2019-12-12 11:01 ` [PATCH 5/6] btrfs: copy fsid and metadata_uuid for pulled disk " damenly.su
2020-01-06 15:12   ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-01-07  1:31     ` Su Yue
2020-01-07  7:18       ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-01-07  7:34         ` Su Yue
2019-12-12 11:01 ` [PATCH 6/6] btrfs: metadata_uuid: move partly logic into find_fsid_inprogress() damenly.su
2019-12-12 13:37   ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-12-13  8:03 ` [PATCH 0/6] btrfs: metadata uuid fixes and enhancements Nikolay Borisov
2019-12-16  0:49   ` Su Yue

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191212110132.11063-1-Damenly_Su@gmx.com \
    --to=damenly.su@gmail.com \
    --cc=Damenly_Su@gmx.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox