From: Su Yue <Damenly_Su@gmx.com>
To: damenly.su@gmail.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] btrfs: split-brain case for scanned changing device with INCOMPAT_METADATA_UUID
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 21:24:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <88fe5f61-dbcf-8fff-77ee-6fa89272ff13@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191212110132.11063-4-Damenly_Su@gmx.com>
On 2019/12/12 7:01 PM, damenly.su@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Su Yue <Damenly_Su@gmx.com>
>
> This patch adds the case for scanned changing device with
> INCOMPAT_METADATA_UUID.
> For this situation, the origin code only handles the case
> the devices already pulled into disk with INCOMPAT_METADATA_UUID set.
> There is an another case that the successful changed devices synced
> without INCOMPAT_METADATA_UUID.
> So add the check of Heather fsid of scanned device equals
s/Heather/whether/g, blame my spellchecker.
> metadata_uuid of fs_devices which is with INCOMPAT_METADATA_UUID
> feature.
>
> Signed-off-by: Su Yue <Damenly_Su@gmx.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index b08b06a89a77..61b4a107bb58 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -654,7 +654,6 @@ static struct btrfs_fs_devices *find_fsid_inprogress(
> return NULL;
> }
>
> -
> static struct btrfs_fs_devices *find_fsid_changed(
> struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super)
> {
> @@ -663,9 +662,14 @@ static struct btrfs_fs_devices *find_fsid_changed(
> /*
> * Handles the case where scanned device is part of an fs that had
> * multiple successful changes of FSID but curently device didn't
> - * observe it. Meaning our fsid will be different than theirs.
> + * observe it.
> + *
> + * Case 1: the devices already changed still owns the feature, their
> + * fsid must differ from the disk_super->fsid.
> */
> list_for_each_entry(fs_devices, &fs_uuids, fs_list) {
> + if (fs_devices->fsid_change)
> + continue;
> if (memcmp(fs_devices->metadata_uuid, fs_devices->fsid,
> BTRFS_FSID_SIZE) != 0 &&
> memcmp(fs_devices->metadata_uuid, disk_super->metadata_uuid,
> @@ -676,7 +680,26 @@ static struct btrfs_fs_devices *find_fsid_changed(
> }
> }
>
> - return NULL;
> + /*
> + * Case 2: the synced devices doesn't have the metadata_uuid feature.
> + * NOTE: the fs_devices has same metadata_uuid and fsid in memory, but
> + * they differs in disk, because fs_id is copied to
> + * fs_devices->metadata_id while alloc_fs_devices if no metadata
> + * feature.
> + */
> + list_for_each_entry(fs_devices, &fs_uuids, fs_list) {
> + if (memcmp(fs_devices->metadata_uuid, fs_devices->fsid,
> + BTRFS_FSID_SIZE) == 0 &&
> + memcmp(fs_devices->fsid, disk_super->metadata_uuid,
> + BTRFS_FSID_SIZE) == 0 && !fs_devices->fsid_change)
> + return fs_devices;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Okay, can't found any fs_devices already synced, back to
> + * search devices unchanged or changing like the device.
> + */
> + return find_fsid(disk_super->fsid, disk_super->metadata_uuid);
> }
>
> static struct btrfs_fs_devices *find_fsid_changing_metada_uuid(
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-12 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-12 11:01 [PATCH 0/6] btrfs: metadata uuid fixes and enhancements damenly.su
2019-12-12 11:01 ` [PATCH 1/6] btrfs: metadata_uuid: fix failed assertion due to unsuccessful device scan damenly.su
2019-12-12 14:15 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-12-13 2:30 ` Su Yue
2019-12-13 2:46 ` [PATCH 1/6] btrfs: metadata_uuid: fix failed assertion due to unsuccessful device scan (reformatted) Su Yue
2019-12-13 5:36 ` Anand Jain
2019-12-13 7:15 ` Su Yue
2019-12-13 8:51 ` Anand Jain
2019-12-13 10:10 ` Su Yue
2019-12-12 11:01 ` [PATCH 2/6] btrfs: metadata_uuid: move split-brain handling from fs_id() to new function damenly.su
2019-12-12 13:05 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-12-12 13:32 ` Su Yue
2019-12-12 11:01 ` [PATCH 3/6] btrfs: split-brain case for scanned changing device with INCOMPAT_METADATA_UUID damenly.su
2019-12-12 13:24 ` Su Yue [this message]
2019-12-12 13:34 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-12-12 14:19 ` Su Yue
2019-12-12 11:01 ` [PATCH 4/6] btrfs: split-brain case for scanned changed device without INCOMPAT_METADATA_UUID damenly.su
2019-12-12 11:01 ` [PATCH 5/6] btrfs: copy fsid and metadata_uuid for pulled disk " damenly.su
2020-01-06 15:12 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-01-07 1:31 ` Su Yue
2020-01-07 7:18 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-01-07 7:34 ` Su Yue
2019-12-12 11:01 ` [PATCH 6/6] btrfs: metadata_uuid: move partly logic into find_fsid_inprogress() damenly.su
2019-12-12 13:37 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-12-13 8:03 ` [PATCH 0/6] btrfs: metadata uuid fixes and enhancements Nikolay Borisov
2019-12-16 0:49 ` Su Yue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=88fe5f61-dbcf-8fff-77ee-6fa89272ff13@gmx.com \
--to=damenly_su@gmx.com \
--cc=damenly.su@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox