From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: damenly.su@gmail.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Su Yue <Damenly_Su@gmx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] btrfs: metadata_uuid: move split-brain handling from fs_id() to new function
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 15:05:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c510f446-67a6-edb7-72a4-0617288a3c52@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191212110132.11063-3-Damenly_Su@gmx.com>
On 12.12.19 г. 13:01 ч., damenly.su@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Su Yue <Damenly_Su@gmx.com>
>
> The parameter @metadata_fsid of fs_id() is not NULL while scanned device
> has metadata_uuid but not changing. Obviously, the cases handling part
> in fs_id() is for this situation. Move the logic into new function
> find_fsid_changing_metadata_uuid().
I think the following changelog might sound better.
metadata_fsid parameter of find_fsid is non-null in once specific case
in device_list_add. Factor the code out of find_fsid to a dedicated
function to improve readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Su Yue <Damenly_Su@gmx.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index 9efa4123c335..b08b06a89a77 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -438,40 +438,6 @@ static noinline struct btrfs_fs_devices *find_fsid(
>
> ASSERT(fsid);
>
> - if (metadata_fsid) {
> - /*
> - * Handle scanned device having completed its fsid change but
> - * belonging to a fs_devices that was created by first scanning
> - * a device which didn't have its fsid/metadata_uuid changed
> - * at all and the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag set.
> - */
> - list_for_each_entry(fs_devices, &fs_uuids, fs_list) {
> - if (fs_devices->fsid_change &&
> - memcmp(metadata_fsid, fs_devices->fsid,
> - BTRFS_FSID_SIZE) == 0 &&
> - memcmp(fs_devices->fsid, fs_devices->metadata_uuid,
> - BTRFS_FSID_SIZE) == 0) {
> - return fs_devices;
> - }
> - }
> - /*
> - * Handle scanned device having completed its fsid change but
> - * belonging to a fs_devices that was created by a device that
> - * has an outdated pair of fsid/metadata_uuid and
> - * CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag set.
> - */
> - list_for_each_entry(fs_devices, &fs_uuids, fs_list) {
> - if (fs_devices->fsid_change &&
> - memcmp(fs_devices->metadata_uuid,
> - fs_devices->fsid, BTRFS_FSID_SIZE) != 0 &&
> - memcmp(metadata_fsid, fs_devices->metadata_uuid,
> - BTRFS_FSID_SIZE) == 0) {
> - return fs_devices;
> - }
> - }
> - }
> -
> - /* Handle non-split brain cases */
> list_for_each_entry(fs_devices, &fs_uuids, fs_list) {
> if (metadata_fsid) {
> if (memcmp(fsid, fs_devices->fsid, BTRFS_FSID_SIZE) == 0
> @@ -712,6 +678,46 @@ static struct btrfs_fs_devices *find_fsid_changed(
>
> return NULL;
> }
> +
> +static struct btrfs_fs_devices *find_fsid_changing_metada_uuid(
That function name is long (and contains a typo). More like something like:
find_fsid_with_metadata_uuid.
> + struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super)
> +{
> + struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices;
> +
> + /*
> + * Handle scanned device having completed its fsid change but
> + * belonging to a fs_devices that was created by first scanning
> + * a device which didn't have its fsid/metadata_uuid changed
> + * at all and the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag set.
> + */
> + list_for_each_entry(fs_devices, &fs_uuids, fs_list) {
> + if (fs_devices->fsid_change &&
> + memcmp(disk_super->metadata_uuid, fs_devices->fsid,
> + BTRFS_FSID_SIZE) == 0 &&
> + memcmp(fs_devices->fsid, fs_devices->metadata_uuid,
> + BTRFS_FSID_SIZE) == 0) {
> + return fs_devices;
> + }
> + }
> + /*
> + * Handle scanned device having completed its fsid change but
> + * belonging to a fs_devices that was created by a device that
> + * has an outdated pair of fsid/metadata_uuid and
> + * CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag set.
> + */
> + list_for_each_entry(fs_devices, &fs_uuids, fs_list) {
> + if (fs_devices->fsid_change &&
> + memcmp(fs_devices->metadata_uuid,
> + fs_devices->fsid, BTRFS_FSID_SIZE) != 0 &&
> + memcmp(disk_super->metadata_uuid, fs_devices->metadata_uuid,
> + BTRFS_FSID_SIZE) == 0) {
> + return fs_devices;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return find_fsid(disk_super->fsid, disk_super->metadata_uuid);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Add new device to list of registered devices
> *
> @@ -751,13 +757,11 @@ static noinline struct btrfs_device *device_list_add(const char *path,
> fs_devices = find_fsid_changed(disk_super);
> }
> } else if (has_metadata_uuid) {
> - fs_devices = find_fsid(disk_super->fsid,
> - disk_super->metadata_uuid);
> + fs_devices = find_fsid_changing_metada_uuid(disk_super);
> } else {
> fs_devices = find_fsid(disk_super->fsid, NULL);
> }
>
> -
> if (!fs_devices) {
> if (has_metadata_uuid)
> fs_devices = alloc_fs_devices(disk_super->fsid,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-12 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-12 11:01 [PATCH 0/6] btrfs: metadata uuid fixes and enhancements damenly.su
2019-12-12 11:01 ` [PATCH 1/6] btrfs: metadata_uuid: fix failed assertion due to unsuccessful device scan damenly.su
2019-12-12 14:15 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-12-13 2:30 ` Su Yue
2019-12-13 2:46 ` [PATCH 1/6] btrfs: metadata_uuid: fix failed assertion due to unsuccessful device scan (reformatted) Su Yue
2019-12-13 5:36 ` Anand Jain
2019-12-13 7:15 ` Su Yue
2019-12-13 8:51 ` Anand Jain
2019-12-13 10:10 ` Su Yue
2019-12-12 11:01 ` [PATCH 2/6] btrfs: metadata_uuid: move split-brain handling from fs_id() to new function damenly.su
2019-12-12 13:05 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2019-12-12 13:32 ` Su Yue
2019-12-12 11:01 ` [PATCH 3/6] btrfs: split-brain case for scanned changing device with INCOMPAT_METADATA_UUID damenly.su
2019-12-12 13:24 ` Su Yue
2019-12-12 13:34 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-12-12 14:19 ` Su Yue
2019-12-12 11:01 ` [PATCH 4/6] btrfs: split-brain case for scanned changed device without INCOMPAT_METADATA_UUID damenly.su
2019-12-12 11:01 ` [PATCH 5/6] btrfs: copy fsid and metadata_uuid for pulled disk " damenly.su
2020-01-06 15:12 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-01-07 1:31 ` Su Yue
2020-01-07 7:18 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-01-07 7:34 ` Su Yue
2019-12-12 11:01 ` [PATCH 6/6] btrfs: metadata_uuid: move partly logic into find_fsid_inprogress() damenly.su
2019-12-12 13:37 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-12-13 8:03 ` [PATCH 0/6] btrfs: metadata uuid fixes and enhancements Nikolay Borisov
2019-12-16 0:49 ` Su Yue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c510f446-67a6-edb7-72a4-0617288a3c52@suse.com \
--to=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=Damenly_Su@gmx.com \
--cc=damenly.su@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox