From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 10/10] btrfs: do not allocate a btrfs_bio for low-level bios
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 07:30:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220429143040.106889-11-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220429143040.106889-1-hch@lst.de>
The bios submitted from btrfs_map_bio don't really interact with the
rest of btrfs and the only btrfs_bio member actually used in the
low-level bios is the pointer to the btrfs_io_contex used for endio
handler.
Use a union in struct btrfs_io_stripe that allows the endio handler to
find the btrfs_io_context and remove the spurious ->device assignment
so that a plain fs_bio_set bio can be used for the low-level bios
allocated inside btrfs_map_bio.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 13 -------------
fs/btrfs/extent_io.h | 1 -
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 5 ++++-
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index a14ed9b9dc2d0..37f4eee418219 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -3209,19 +3209,6 @@ struct bio *btrfs_bio_alloc(unsigned int nr_iovecs)
return bio;
}
-struct bio *btrfs_bio_clone(struct block_device *bdev, struct bio *bio)
-{
- struct btrfs_bio *bbio;
- struct bio *new;
-
- /* Bio allocation backed by a bioset does not fail */
- new = bio_alloc_clone(bdev, bio, GFP_NOFS, &btrfs_bioset);
- bbio = btrfs_bio(new);
- btrfs_bio_init(bbio);
- bbio->iter = bio->bi_iter;
- return new;
-}
-
struct bio *btrfs_bio_clone_partial(struct bio *orig, u64 offset, u64 size)
{
struct bio *bio;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
index b390ec79f9a86..3078e90be3a99 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
@@ -265,7 +265,6 @@ void extent_clear_unlock_delalloc(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 start, u64 end,
int btrfs_alloc_page_array(unsigned int nr_pages, struct page **page_array);
struct bio *btrfs_bio_alloc(unsigned int nr_iovecs);
-struct bio *btrfs_bio_clone(struct block_device *bdev, struct bio *bio);
struct bio *btrfs_bio_clone_partial(struct bio *orig, u64 offset, u64 size);
void end_extent_writepage(struct page *page, int err, u64 start, u64 end);
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 28ac2bfb5d296..8577893ccb4b9 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -6666,23 +6666,21 @@ static void btrfs_end_bioc(struct btrfs_io_context *bioc, bool async)
static void btrfs_end_bio(struct bio *bio)
{
- struct btrfs_io_context *bioc = bio->bi_private;
+ struct btrfs_io_stripe *stripe = bio->bi_private;
+ struct btrfs_io_context *bioc = stripe->bioc;
if (bio->bi_status) {
atomic_inc(&bioc->error);
if (bio->bi_status == BLK_STS_IOERR ||
bio->bi_status == BLK_STS_TARGET) {
- struct btrfs_device *dev = btrfs_bio(bio)->device;
-
- ASSERT(dev->bdev);
if (btrfs_op(bio) == BTRFS_MAP_WRITE)
- btrfs_dev_stat_inc_and_print(dev,
+ btrfs_dev_stat_inc_and_print(stripe->dev,
BTRFS_DEV_STAT_WRITE_ERRS);
else if (!(bio->bi_opf & REQ_RAHEAD))
- btrfs_dev_stat_inc_and_print(dev,
+ btrfs_dev_stat_inc_and_print(stripe->dev,
BTRFS_DEV_STAT_READ_ERRS);
if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_PREFLUSH)
- btrfs_dev_stat_inc_and_print(dev,
+ btrfs_dev_stat_inc_and_print(stripe->dev,
BTRFS_DEV_STAT_FLUSH_ERRS);
}
}
@@ -6714,14 +6712,16 @@ static void submit_stripe_bio(struct btrfs_io_context *bioc,
}
if (clone) {
- bio = btrfs_bio_clone(dev->bdev, orig_bio);
+ bio = bio_alloc_clone(dev->bdev, orig_bio, GFP_NOFS,
+ &fs_bio_set);
} else {
bio = orig_bio;
bio_set_dev(bio, dev->bdev);
+ btrfs_bio(bio)->device = dev;
}
- bio->bi_private = bioc;
- btrfs_bio(bio)->device = dev;
+ bioc->stripes[dev_nr].bioc = bioc;
+ bio->bi_private = &bioc->stripes[dev_nr];
bio->bi_end_io = btrfs_end_bio;
bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = physical >> 9;
/*
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
index 28e28b7c48649..825e44c82f2b0 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
@@ -396,7 +396,10 @@ static inline void btrfs_bio_free_csum(struct btrfs_bio *bbio)
struct btrfs_io_stripe {
struct btrfs_device *dev;
- u64 physical;
+ union {
+ u64 physical; /* block mapping */
+ struct btrfs_io_context *bioc; /* for the endio handler */
+ };
u64 length; /* only used for discard mappings */
};
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-29 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-29 14:30 cleanup btrfs bio handling, part 2 v2 Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 01/10] btrfs: move more work into btrfs_end_bioc Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 02/10] btrfs: cleanup btrfs_submit_dio_bio Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 03/10] btrfs: split btrfs_submit_data_bio Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 04/10] btrfs: don't double-defer bio completions for compressed reads Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 05/10] btrfs: defer I/O completion based on the btrfs_raid_bio Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-01 4:40 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-01 4:53 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-02 16:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-03 16:44 ` David Sterba
2022-06-03 16:45 ` David Sterba
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 06/10] btrfs: don't use btrfs_bio_wq_end_io for compressed writes Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 07/10] btrfs: centralize setting REQ_META Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 08/10] btrfs: remove btrfs_end_io_wq Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 09/10] btrfs: refactor btrfs_map_bio Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-05-26 7:36 cleanup btrfs bio handling, part 2 v4 Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-26 7:36 ` [PATCH 10/10] btrfs: do not allocate a btrfs_bio for low-level bios Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-01 19:39 ` David Sterba
2022-05-04 12:25 cleanup btrfs bio handling, part 2 v3 Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-04 12:25 ` [PATCH 10/10] btrfs: do not allocate a btrfs_bio for low-level bios Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-05 11:23 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-04-25 7:54 cleanup btrfs bio handling, part 2 Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-25 7:54 ` [PATCH 10/10] btrfs: do not allocate a btrfs_bio for low-level bios Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-25 9:01 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-04-25 9:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220429143040.106889-11-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox