From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] btrfs: move more work into btrfs_end_bioc
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 07:30:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220429143040.106889-2-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220429143040.106889-1-hch@lst.de>
Assign ->mirror_num and ->bi_status in btrfs_end_bioc instead of
duplicating the logic in the callers. Also remove the bio argument as
it always must be bioc->orig_bio and the now pointless bioc_error that
did nothing but assign bi_sector to the same value just sampled in the
caller.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 72 ++++++++++++++--------------------------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 748614b00ffa2..aeacb87457687 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -6621,19 +6621,29 @@ int btrfs_map_sblock(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, enum btrfs_map_op op,
return __btrfs_map_block(fs_info, op, logical, length, bioc_ret, 0, 1);
}
-static inline void btrfs_end_bioc(struct btrfs_io_context *bioc, struct bio *bio)
+static inline void btrfs_end_bioc(struct btrfs_io_context *bioc)
{
- bio->bi_private = bioc->private;
- bio->bi_end_io = bioc->end_io;
- bio_endio(bio);
+ struct bio *orig_bio = bioc->orig_bio;
+ btrfs_bio(orig_bio)->mirror_num = bioc->mirror_num;
+ orig_bio->bi_private = bioc->private;
+ orig_bio->bi_end_io = bioc->end_io;
+
+ /*
+ * Only send an error to the higher layers if it is beyond the tolerance
+ * threshold.
+ */
+ if (atomic_read(&bioc->error) > bioc->max_errors)
+ orig_bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
+ else
+ orig_bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_OK;
+ bio_endio(orig_bio);
btrfs_put_bioc(bioc);
}
static void btrfs_end_bio(struct bio *bio)
{
struct btrfs_io_context *bioc = bio->bi_private;
- int is_orig_bio = 0;
if (bio->bi_status) {
atomic_inc(&bioc->error);
@@ -6654,35 +6664,12 @@ static void btrfs_end_bio(struct bio *bio)
}
}
- if (bio == bioc->orig_bio)
- is_orig_bio = 1;
+ if (bio != bioc->orig_bio)
+ bio_put(bio);
btrfs_bio_counter_dec(bioc->fs_info);
-
- if (atomic_dec_and_test(&bioc->stripes_pending)) {
- if (!is_orig_bio) {
- bio_put(bio);
- bio = bioc->orig_bio;
- }
-
- btrfs_bio(bio)->mirror_num = bioc->mirror_num;
- /* only send an error to the higher layers if it is
- * beyond the tolerance of the btrfs bio
- */
- if (atomic_read(&bioc->error) > bioc->max_errors) {
- bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
- } else {
- /*
- * this bio is actually up to date, we didn't
- * go over the max number of errors
- */
- bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_OK;
- }
-
- btrfs_end_bioc(bioc, bio);
- } else if (!is_orig_bio) {
- bio_put(bio);
- }
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&bioc->stripes_pending))
+ btrfs_end_bioc(bioc);
}
static void submit_stripe_bio(struct btrfs_io_context *bioc, struct bio *bio,
@@ -6720,23 +6707,6 @@ static void submit_stripe_bio(struct btrfs_io_context *bioc, struct bio *bio,
submit_bio(bio);
}
-static void bioc_error(struct btrfs_io_context *bioc, struct bio *bio, u64 logical)
-{
- atomic_inc(&bioc->error);
- if (atomic_dec_and_test(&bioc->stripes_pending)) {
- /* Should be the original bio. */
- WARN_ON(bio != bioc->orig_bio);
-
- btrfs_bio(bio)->mirror_num = bioc->mirror_num;
- bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = logical >> 9;
- if (atomic_read(&bioc->error) > bioc->max_errors)
- bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
- else
- bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_OK;
- btrfs_end_bioc(bioc, bio);
- }
-}
-
blk_status_t btrfs_map_bio(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct bio *bio,
int mirror_num)
{
@@ -6795,7 +6765,9 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_map_bio(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct bio *bio,
&dev->dev_state) ||
(btrfs_op(first_bio) == BTRFS_MAP_WRITE &&
!test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_WRITEABLE, &dev->dev_state))) {
- bioc_error(bioc, first_bio, logical);
+ atomic_inc(&bioc->error);
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&bioc->stripes_pending))
+ btrfs_end_bioc(bioc);
continue;
}
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-29 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-29 14:30 cleanup btrfs bio handling, part 2 v2 Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 02/10] btrfs: cleanup btrfs_submit_dio_bio Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 03/10] btrfs: split btrfs_submit_data_bio Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 04/10] btrfs: don't double-defer bio completions for compressed reads Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 05/10] btrfs: defer I/O completion based on the btrfs_raid_bio Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-01 4:40 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-01 4:53 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-02 16:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-03 16:44 ` David Sterba
2022-06-03 16:45 ` David Sterba
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 06/10] btrfs: don't use btrfs_bio_wq_end_io for compressed writes Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 07/10] btrfs: centralize setting REQ_META Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 08/10] btrfs: remove btrfs_end_io_wq Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 09/10] btrfs: refactor btrfs_map_bio Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 10/10] btrfs: do not allocate a btrfs_bio for low-level bios Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-05-26 7:36 cleanup btrfs bio handling, part 2 v4 Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-26 7:36 ` [PATCH 01/10] btrfs: move more work into btrfs_end_bioc Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-25 7:54 cleanup btrfs bio handling, part 2 Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-25 7:54 ` [PATCH 01/10] btrfs: move more work into btrfs_end_bioc Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-26 7:19 ` Johannes Thumshirn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220429143040.106889-2-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox