From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/10] btrfs: defer I/O completion based on the btrfs_raid_bio
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 07:30:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220429143040.106889-6-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220429143040.106889-1-hch@lst.de>
Instead of attaching a an extra allocation an indirect call to each
low-level bio issued by the RAID code, add a work_struct to struct
btrfs_raid_bio and only defer the per-rbio completion action. The
per-bio action for all the I/Os are trivial and can be safely done
from interrupt context.
As a nice side effect this also allows sharing the boilerplate code
for the per-bio completions
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 2 +-
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 12 ++---
fs/btrfs/disk-io.h | 1 -
fs/btrfs/raid56.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index 40a6f61559348..4dd0d4a2e7757 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -853,7 +853,7 @@ struct btrfs_fs_info {
struct btrfs_workqueue *flush_workers;
struct btrfs_workqueue *endio_workers;
struct btrfs_workqueue *endio_meta_workers;
- struct btrfs_workqueue *endio_raid56_workers;
+ struct workqueue_struct *endio_raid56_workers;
struct workqueue_struct *rmw_workers;
struct btrfs_workqueue *endio_meta_write_workers;
struct btrfs_workqueue *endio_write_workers;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index 73e12ecc81be1..3c6137734d28c 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -753,14 +753,10 @@ static void end_workqueue_bio(struct bio *bio)
wq = fs_info->endio_meta_write_workers;
else if (end_io_wq->metadata == BTRFS_WQ_ENDIO_FREE_SPACE)
wq = fs_info->endio_freespace_worker;
- else if (end_io_wq->metadata == BTRFS_WQ_ENDIO_RAID56)
- wq = fs_info->endio_raid56_workers;
else
wq = fs_info->endio_write_workers;
} else {
- if (end_io_wq->metadata == BTRFS_WQ_ENDIO_RAID56)
- wq = fs_info->endio_raid56_workers;
- else if (end_io_wq->metadata)
+ if (end_io_wq->metadata)
wq = fs_info->endio_meta_workers;
else
wq = fs_info->endio_workers;
@@ -2274,7 +2270,8 @@ static void btrfs_stop_all_workers(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
btrfs_destroy_workqueue(fs_info->hipri_workers);
btrfs_destroy_workqueue(fs_info->workers);
btrfs_destroy_workqueue(fs_info->endio_workers);
- btrfs_destroy_workqueue(fs_info->endio_raid56_workers);
+ if (fs_info->endio_raid56_workers)
+ destroy_workqueue(fs_info->endio_raid56_workers);
if (fs_info->rmw_workers)
destroy_workqueue(fs_info->rmw_workers);
btrfs_destroy_workqueue(fs_info->endio_write_workers);
@@ -2477,8 +2474,7 @@ static int btrfs_init_workqueues(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
btrfs_alloc_workqueue(fs_info, "endio-meta-write", flags,
max_active, 2);
fs_info->endio_raid56_workers =
- btrfs_alloc_workqueue(fs_info, "endio-raid56", flags,
- max_active, 4);
+ alloc_workqueue("btrfs-endio-raid56", flags, max_active);
fs_info->rmw_workers = alloc_workqueue("btrfs-rmw", flags, max_active);
fs_info->endio_write_workers =
btrfs_alloc_workqueue(fs_info, "endio-write", flags,
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.h b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.h
index 9340e3266e0ac..97255e3d7e524 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.h
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@ enum btrfs_wq_endio_type {
BTRFS_WQ_ENDIO_DATA,
BTRFS_WQ_ENDIO_METADATA,
BTRFS_WQ_ENDIO_FREE_SPACE,
- BTRFS_WQ_ENDIO_RAID56,
};
static inline u64 btrfs_sb_offset(int mirror)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/raid56.c b/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
index a5b623ee6facd..1a3c1a9b10d0b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
@@ -164,6 +164,9 @@ struct btrfs_raid_bio {
atomic_t stripes_pending;
atomic_t error;
+
+ struct work_struct end_io_work;
+
/*
* these are two arrays of pointers. We allocate the
* rbio big enough to hold them both and setup their
@@ -1552,15 +1555,7 @@ static void set_bio_pages_uptodate(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio, struct bio *bio)
}
}
-/*
- * end io for the read phase of the rmw cycle. All the bios here are physical
- * stripe bios we've read from the disk so we can recalculate the parity of the
- * stripe.
- *
- * This will usually kick off finish_rmw once all the bios are read in, but it
- * may trigger parity reconstruction if we had any errors along the way
- */
-static void raid_rmw_end_io(struct bio *bio)
+static void raid56_bio_end_io(struct bio *bio)
{
struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio = bio->bi_private;
@@ -1571,23 +1566,34 @@ static void raid_rmw_end_io(struct bio *bio)
bio_put(bio);
- if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&rbio->stripes_pending))
- return;
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rbio->stripes_pending))
+ queue_work(rbio->bioc->fs_info->endio_raid56_workers,
+ &rbio->end_io_work);
+}
- if (atomic_read(&rbio->error) > rbio->bioc->max_errors)
- goto cleanup;
+/*
+ * End io handler for the read phase of the rmw cycle. All the bios here are
+ * physical stripe bios we've read from the disk so we can recalculate the
+ * parity of the stripe.
+ *
+ * This will usually kick off finish_rmw once all the bios are read in, but it
+ * may trigger parity reconstruction if we had any errors along the way
+ */
+static void raid56_rmw_end_io_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio =
+ container_of(work, struct btrfs_raid_bio, end_io_work);
+
+ if (atomic_read(&rbio->error) > rbio->bioc->max_errors) {
+ rbio_orig_end_io(rbio, BLK_STS_IOERR);
+ return;
+ }
/*
- * this will normally call finish_rmw to start our write
- * but if there are any failed stripes we'll reconstruct
- * from parity first
+ * This will normally call finish_rmw to start our write but if there
+ * are any failed stripes we'll reconstruct from parity first.
*/
validate_rbio_for_rmw(rbio);
- return;
-
-cleanup:
-
- rbio_orig_end_io(rbio, BLK_STS_IOERR);
}
/*
@@ -1662,11 +1668,9 @@ static int raid56_rmw_stripe(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio)
* touch it after that.
*/
atomic_set(&rbio->stripes_pending, bios_to_read);
+ INIT_WORK(&rbio->end_io_work, raid56_rmw_end_io_work);
while ((bio = bio_list_pop(&bio_list))) {
- bio->bi_end_io = raid_rmw_end_io;
-
- btrfs_bio_wq_end_io(rbio->bioc->fs_info, bio, BTRFS_WQ_ENDIO_RAID56);
-
+ bio->bi_end_io = raid56_bio_end_io;
submit_bio(bio);
}
/* the actual write will happen once the reads are done */
@@ -2108,25 +2112,13 @@ static void __raid_recover_end_io(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio)
}
/*
- * This is called only for stripes we've read from disk to
- * reconstruct the parity.
+ * This is called only for stripes we've read from disk to reconstruct the
+ * parity.
*/
-static void raid_recover_end_io(struct bio *bio)
+static void raid_recover_end_io_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
- struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio = bio->bi_private;
-
- /*
- * we only read stripe pages off the disk, set them
- * up to date if there were no errors
- */
- if (bio->bi_status)
- fail_bio_stripe(rbio, bio);
- else
- set_bio_pages_uptodate(rbio, bio);
- bio_put(bio);
-
- if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&rbio->stripes_pending))
- return;
+ struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio =
+ container_of(work, struct btrfs_raid_bio, end_io_work);
if (atomic_read(&rbio->error) > rbio->bioc->max_errors)
rbio_orig_end_io(rbio, BLK_STS_IOERR);
@@ -2209,11 +2201,9 @@ static int __raid56_parity_recover(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio)
* touch it after that.
*/
atomic_set(&rbio->stripes_pending, bios_to_read);
+ INIT_WORK(&rbio->end_io_work, raid_recover_end_io_work);
while ((bio = bio_list_pop(&bio_list))) {
- bio->bi_end_io = raid_recover_end_io;
-
- btrfs_bio_wq_end_io(rbio->bioc->fs_info, bio, BTRFS_WQ_ENDIO_RAID56);
-
+ bio->bi_end_io = raid56_bio_end_io;
submit_bio(bio);
}
@@ -2582,8 +2572,7 @@ static noinline void finish_parity_scrub(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio,
atomic_set(&rbio->stripes_pending, nr_data);
while ((bio = bio_list_pop(&bio_list))) {
- bio->bi_end_io = raid_write_end_io;
-
+ bio->bi_end_io = raid56_bio_end_io;
submit_bio(bio);
}
return;
@@ -2671,24 +2660,14 @@ static void validate_rbio_for_parity_scrub(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio)
* This will usually kick off finish_rmw once all the bios are read in, but it
* may trigger parity reconstruction if we had any errors along the way
*/
-static void raid56_parity_scrub_end_io(struct bio *bio)
+static void raid56_parity_scrub_end_io_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
- struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio = bio->bi_private;
-
- if (bio->bi_status)
- fail_bio_stripe(rbio, bio);
- else
- set_bio_pages_uptodate(rbio, bio);
-
- bio_put(bio);
-
- if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&rbio->stripes_pending))
- return;
+ struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio =
+ container_of(work, struct btrfs_raid_bio, end_io_work);
/*
- * this will normally call finish_rmw to start our write
- * but if there are any failed stripes we'll reconstruct
- * from parity first
+ * This will normally call finish_rmw to start our write, but if there
+ * are any failed stripes we'll reconstruct from parity first
*/
validate_rbio_for_parity_scrub(rbio);
}
@@ -2758,11 +2737,9 @@ static void raid56_parity_scrub_stripe(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio)
* touch it after that.
*/
atomic_set(&rbio->stripes_pending, bios_to_read);
+ INIT_WORK(&rbio->end_io_work, raid56_parity_scrub_end_io_work);
while ((bio = bio_list_pop(&bio_list))) {
- bio->bi_end_io = raid56_parity_scrub_end_io;
-
- btrfs_bio_wq_end_io(rbio->bioc->fs_info, bio, BTRFS_WQ_ENDIO_RAID56);
-
+ bio->bi_end_io = raid56_bio_end_io;
submit_bio(bio);
}
/* the actual write will happen once the reads are done */
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-29 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-29 14:30 cleanup btrfs bio handling, part 2 v2 Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 01/10] btrfs: move more work into btrfs_end_bioc Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 02/10] btrfs: cleanup btrfs_submit_dio_bio Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 03/10] btrfs: split btrfs_submit_data_bio Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 04/10] btrfs: don't double-defer bio completions for compressed reads Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-05-01 4:40 ` [PATCH 05/10] btrfs: defer I/O completion based on the btrfs_raid_bio Qu Wenruo
2022-05-01 4:53 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-02 16:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-03 16:44 ` David Sterba
2022-06-03 16:45 ` David Sterba
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 06/10] btrfs: don't use btrfs_bio_wq_end_io for compressed writes Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 07/10] btrfs: centralize setting REQ_META Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 08/10] btrfs: remove btrfs_end_io_wq Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 09/10] btrfs: refactor btrfs_map_bio Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 10/10] btrfs: do not allocate a btrfs_bio for low-level bios Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-05-04 12:25 cleanup btrfs bio handling, part 2 v3 Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-04 12:25 ` [PATCH 05/10] btrfs: defer I/O completion based on the btrfs_raid_bio Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-25 7:54 cleanup btrfs bio handling, part 2 Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-25 7:54 ` [PATCH 05/10] btrfs: defer I/O completion based on the btrfs_raid_bio Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220429143040.106889-6-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox