Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs: Use btrfs_try_lock_balance in btrfs_ioctl_balance

[David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>]

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 08:42:37AM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9.05.22 г. 22:51 ч., David Sterba wrote:
> > On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 10:08:25AM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> >> This eliminates 2 labels and makes the code generally more streamlined.
> >> Also rename the 'out_bargs' label to 'out_unlock' since bargs is going
> >> to be freed under the 'out' label. This also fixes a memory leak since
> >> bargs wasn't correctly freed in one of the condition which are now moved
> >> in btrfs_try_lock_balance.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
> >> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> >> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> V2:
> >>   * Removed extra call to kfree(bargs) which resulted in a double free
> > 
> > Where does this patch apply to? It's using btrfs_try_lock_balance but that
> > does not exist in code nor in the patch.
> 
> Well this is v2 2/2 so it's part of the same series just an update to 
> the 2nd patch.

Ah sorry, I had moved the thread to archive and then this patch did not
thread in properly. Added to misc-next, thanks.