public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>
To: josef@toxicpanda.com, dsterba@suse.com, clm@fb.com,
	axboe@kernel.dk, kbusch@kernel.org, hch@lst.de
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, gost.dev@samsung.com,
	Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>
Subject: [RFC 0/3] Btrfs checksum offload
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 19:32:04 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250129140207.22718-1-joshi.k@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CGME20250129141039epcas5p11feb1be4124c0db3c5223325924183a3@epcas5p1.samsung.com

TL;DR first: this makes Btrfs chuck its checksum tree and leverage NVMe
SSD for data checksumming.

Now, the longer version for why/how.

End-to-end data protection (E2EDP)-capable drives require the transfer
of integrity metadata (PI).
This is currently handled by the block layer, without filesystem
involvement/awareness.
The block layer attaches the metadata buffer, generates the checksum
(and reftag) for write I/O, and verifies it during read I/O.

Btrfs has its own data and metadata checksumming, which is currently
disconnected from the above.
It maintains a separate on-device 'checksum tree' for data checksums,
while the block layer will also be checksumming each Btrfs I/O.

There is value in avoiding Copy-on-write (COW) checksum tree on
a device that can anyway store checksums inline (as part of PI).
This would eliminate extra checksum writes/reads, making I/O
more CPU-efficient.
Additionally, usable space would increase, and write
amplification, both in Btrfs and eventually at the device level, would
be reduced [*].

NVMe drives can also automatically insert and strip the PI/checksum
and provide a per-I/O control knob (the PRACT bit) for this.
Block layer currently makes no attempt to know/advertise this offload.

This patch series: (a) adds checksum offload awareness to the
block layer (patch #1),
(b) enables the NVMe driver to register and support the offload
(patch #2), and
(c) introduces an opt-in (datasum_offload mount option) in Btrfs to
apply checksum offload for data (patch #3).

[*] Here are some perf/write-amplification numbers from randwrite test [1]
on 3 configs (same device):
Config 1: No meta format (4K) + Btrfs (base)
Config 2: Meta format (4K + 8b) + Btrfs (base)
Config 3: Meta format (4K + 8b) + Btrfs (datasum_offload)

In config 1 and 2, Btrfs will operate with a checksum tree.
Only in config 2, block-layer will attach integrity buffer with each I/O and
do checksum/reftag verification.
Only in config 3, offload will take place and device will generate/verify
the checksum.

AppW: writes issued by app, 120G (4 Jobs, each writing 30G)
FsW: writes issued to device (from iostat)
ExtraW: extra writes compared to AppW

Direct I/O
---------------------------------------------------------
Config		IOPS(K)		FsW(G)		ExtraW(G)
1		144		186		66
2		141		181		61
3		172		129		9

Buffered I/O
---------------------------------------------------------
Config		IOPS(K)		FsW(G)		ExtraW(G)
1		82		255		135
2		80		181		132
3		100		199		79

Write amplification is generally high (and that's understandable given
B-trees) but not sure why buffered I/O shows that much.

[1] fio --name=btrfswrite --ioengine=io_uring --directory=/mnt --blocksize=4k --readwrite=randwrite --filesize=30G --numjobs=4 --iodepth=32 --randseed=0 --direct=1 -output=out --group_reporting


Kanchan Joshi (3):
  block: add integrity offload
  nvme: support integrity offload
  btrfs: add checksum offload

 block/bio-integrity.c     | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 block/t10-pi.c            |  7 +++++++
 drivers/nvme/host/core.c  | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h  |  1 +
 fs/btrfs/bio.c            | 12 +++++++++++
 fs/btrfs/fs.h             |  1 +
 fs/btrfs/super.c          |  9 +++++++++
 include/linux/blk_types.h |  3 +++
 include/linux/blkdev.h    |  7 +++++++
 9 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
2.25.1


       reply	other threads:[~2025-01-29 14:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20250129141039epcas5p11feb1be4124c0db3c5223325924183a3@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2025-01-29 14:02 ` Kanchan Joshi [this message]
2025-01-29 14:02   ` [RFC 1/3] block: add integrity offload Kanchan Joshi
2025-01-29 14:02   ` [RFC 2/3] nvme: support " Kanchan Joshi
2025-01-29 14:02   ` [RFC 3/3] btrfs: add checksum offload Kanchan Joshi
2025-01-29 21:27     ` Qu Wenruo
2025-01-29 14:55   ` [RFC 0/3] Btrfs " Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-31 10:19     ` Kanchan Joshi
2025-01-31 10:29       ` Johannes Thumshirn
2025-02-03 13:25         ` Kanchan Joshi
2025-02-03 13:40           ` Johannes Thumshirn
2025-02-03 14:03             ` Kanchan Joshi
2025-02-03 14:41               ` Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-29 15:28   ` Keith Busch
2025-01-29 15:40     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-29 18:03       ` Keith Busch
2025-01-30 12:54         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-29 15:35   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-30  9:22     ` Kanchan Joshi
2025-01-30 12:53       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-31 10:29         ` Kanchan Joshi
2025-01-31 10:42           ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-29 15:55   ` Mark Harmstone
2025-01-29 19:02   ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2025-01-30  9:33     ` Daniel Vacek
2025-01-30 20:21   ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-01-31  7:44     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-03 19:31       ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-02-04  5:12         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-04 12:52           ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-02-04 13:49             ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-05  2:31               ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-02-03 13:24     ` Kanchan Joshi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250129140207.22718-1-joshi.k@samsung.com \
    --to=joshi.k@samsung.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox