From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: add verbose option to btrfs device scan
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 18:09:12 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f150d66-0c4d-b0f2-4cf9-9bc1194d83e9@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190715144241.1077-1-anand.jain@oracle.com>
On 15.07.19 г. 17:42 ч., Anand Jain wrote:
> To help debug device scan issues, add verbose option to btrfs device scan.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
I fail to see what this patch helps for. We get the path in case of
errors, in case of success what good could the path be ?
> ---
> cmds/device.c | 8 ++++++--
> cmds/filesystem.c | 2 +-
> common/device-scan.c | 4 +++-
> common/device-scan.h | 2 +-
> common/utils.c | 2 +-
> disk-io.c | 2 +-
> 6 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cmds/device.c b/cmds/device.c
> index 24158308a41b..2fa13e61f806 100644
> --- a/cmds/device.c
> +++ b/cmds/device.c
> @@ -313,6 +313,7 @@ static int cmd_device_scan(const struct cmd_struct *cmd, int argc, char **argv)
> int all = 0;
> int ret = 0;
> int forget = 0;
> + int verbose = 0;
nit: make it a bool.
>
> optind = 0;
> while (1) {
> @@ -323,7 +324,7 @@ static int cmd_device_scan(const struct cmd_struct *cmd, int argc, char **argv)
> { NULL, 0, NULL, 0}
> };
>
> - c = getopt_long(argc, argv, "du", long_options, NULL);
> + c = getopt_long(argc, argv, "duv", long_options, NULL);
> if (c < 0)
> break;
> switch (c) {
> @@ -333,6 +334,9 @@ static int cmd_device_scan(const struct cmd_struct *cmd, int argc, char **argv)
> case 'u':
> forget = 1;
> break;
> + case 'v':
> + verbose = 1;
> + break;
> default:
> usage_unknown_option(cmd, argv);
> }
> @@ -354,7 +358,7 @@ static int cmd_device_scan(const struct cmd_struct *cmd, int argc, char **argv)
> }
> } else {
> printf("Scanning for Btrfs filesystems\n");
> - ret = btrfs_scan_devices();
> + ret = btrfs_scan_devices(verbose);
> error_on(ret, "error %d while scanning", ret);
> ret = btrfs_register_all_devices();
> error_on(ret,
> diff --git a/cmds/filesystem.c b/cmds/filesystem.c
> index 4f22089abeaa..37b23af36847 100644
> --- a/cmds/filesystem.c
> +++ b/cmds/filesystem.c
> @@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ devs_only:
> else
> ret = 1;
> } else {
> - ret = btrfs_scan_devices();
> + ret = btrfs_scan_devices(0);
> }
>
> if (ret) {
> diff --git a/common/device-scan.c b/common/device-scan.c
> index 2c5ae225f710..bea201b351f0 100644
> --- a/common/device-scan.c
> +++ b/common/device-scan.c
> @@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ void free_seen_fsid(struct seen_fsid *seen_fsid_hash[])
> }
> }
>
> -int btrfs_scan_devices(void)
> +int btrfs_scan_devices(int verbose)
> {
> int fd = -1;
> int ret;
> @@ -380,6 +380,8 @@ int btrfs_scan_devices(void)
> continue;
> /* if we are here its definitely a btrfs disk*/
> strncpy_null(path, blkid_dev_devname(dev));
> + if (verbose)
> + printf("blkid: btrfs device: %s\n", path);
>
> fd = open(path, O_RDONLY);
> if (fd < 0) {
> diff --git a/common/device-scan.h b/common/device-scan.h
> index eda2bae5c6c4..8017a27511b9 100644
> --- a/common/device-scan.h
> +++ b/common/device-scan.h
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ struct seen_fsid {
> int fd;
> };
>
> -int btrfs_scan_devices(void);
> +int btrfs_scan_devices(int verbose);
> int btrfs_register_one_device(const char *fname);
> int btrfs_register_all_devices(void);
> int btrfs_add_to_fsid(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> diff --git a/common/utils.c b/common/utils.c
> index ad938409a94f..36ce89a025f1 100644
> --- a/common/utils.c
> +++ b/common/utils.c
> @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ int check_mounted_where(int fd, const char *file, char *where, int size,
>
> /* scan other devices */
> if (is_btrfs && total_devs > 1) {
> - ret = btrfs_scan_devices();
> + ret = btrfs_scan_devices(0);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
> diff --git a/disk-io.c b/disk-io.c
> index be44eead5cef..4f52a29700ab 100644
> --- a/disk-io.c
> +++ b/disk-io.c
> @@ -1085,7 +1085,7 @@ int btrfs_scan_fs_devices(int fd, const char *path,
> }
>
> if (!skip_devices && total_devs != 1) {
> - ret = btrfs_scan_devices();
> + ret = btrfs_scan_devices(0);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-15 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-15 14:42 [PATCH] btrfs-progs: add verbose option to btrfs device scan Anand Jain
2019-07-15 15:09 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2019-07-16 0:36 ` Anand Jain
2019-07-16 1:26 ` Qu Wenruo
2019-07-16 2:50 ` Anand Jain
2019-07-16 6:46 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-07-16 8:59 ` Anand Jain
2019-07-16 3:05 ` [PATCH v2] " Anand Jain
2019-08-28 7:51 ` Anand Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4f150d66-0c4d-b0f2-4cf9-9bc1194d83e9@suse.com \
--to=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox