From: "Nirjhar Roy (IBM)" <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, djwong@kernel.org, zlang@kernel.org,
fdmanana@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] generic/274: Make the test compatible with all blocksizes.
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 12:00:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98188746-d549-4d4c-840c-3a7c6379866a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18dbfdb1-57cb-425a-bbfb-bac8a658441d@gmx.com>
On 8/4/25 10:05, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> 在 2025/7/29 15:51, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) 写道:
>> On btrfs with 64k blocksize on powerpc with 64k pagesize
>> it failed with the following error:
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> preallocation test
>> ------------------------------
>> -done
>> +failed to write to test file
>> +(see /home/xfstests-dev/results//btrfs_64k/generic/274.full for
>> details)
>> ...
>> So, this test is written with 4K block size in mind. As we can see,
>> it first creates a file of size 4K and then fallocates 4MB beyond the
>> EOF.
>> Then there are 2 loops - one that fragments at alternate blocks and
>> the other punches holes in the remaining alternate blocks. Hence,
>> the test fails in 64k block size due to incorrect calculations.
>>
>> Fix this test by making the test scale with the block size, that is
>> the offset, filesize and the assumed blocksize matches/scales with
>> the actual blocksize of the underlying filesystem.
>
> Again, just enlarge the block size from 4K to 64K, then all block size
> will work.
Okay.
--NR
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
>
>>
>> Reported-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> tests/generic/274 | 21 +++++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/generic/274 b/tests/generic/274
>> index 916c7173..4ea42f30 100755
>> --- a/tests/generic/274
>> +++ b/tests/generic/274
>> @@ -40,30 +40,31 @@ _scratch_unmount 2>/dev/null
>> _scratch_mkfs_sized $((2 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024)) >>$seqres.full 2>&1
>> _scratch_mount
>> -# Create a 4k file and Allocate 4M past EOF on that file
>> -$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite 0 4k" -c "falloc -k 4k 4m"
>> $SCRATCH_MNT/test \
>> - >>$seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "failed to create test file"
>> +blksz=`_get_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT`
>> +scale=$(( blksz / 1024 ))
>> +# Create a blocksize worth file and Allocate a large file past EOF
>> on that file
>> +$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -b $blksz 0 $blksz" -c "falloc -k $blksz
>> $(( 1 * 1024 * 1024 * scale ))" \
>> + $SCRATCH_MNT/test >>$seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "failed to create
>> test file"
>> # Fill the rest of the fs completely
>> # Note, this will show ENOSPC errors in $seqres.full, that's ok.
>> echo "Fill fs with 1M IOs; ENOSPC expected" >> $seqres.full
>> dd if=/dev/zero of=$SCRATCH_MNT/tmp1 bs=1M >>$seqres.full 2>&1
>> -echo "Fill fs with 4K IOs; ENOSPC expected" >> $seqres.full
>> -dd if=/dev/zero of=$SCRATCH_MNT/tmp2 bs=4K >>$seqres.full 2>&1
>> +echo "Fill fs with $blksz K IOs; ENOSPC expected" >> $seqres.full
>> +dd if=/dev/zero of=$SCRATCH_MNT/tmp2 bs=$blksz >>$seqres.full 2>&1
>> _scratch_sync
>> # Last effort, use O_SYNC
>> -echo "Fill fs with 4K DIOs; ENOSPC expected" >> $seqres.full
>> -dd if=/dev/zero of=$SCRATCH_MNT/tmp3 bs=4K oflag=sync >>$seqres.full
>> 2>&1
>> +echo "Fill fs with $blksz DIOs; ENOSPC expected" >> $seqres.full
>> +dd if=/dev/zero of=$SCRATCH_MNT/tmp3 bs=$blksz oflag=sync
>> >>$seqres.full 2>&1
>> # Save space usage info
>> echo "Post-fill space:" >> $seqres.full
>> df $SCRATCH_MNT >>$seqres.full 2>&1
>> -
>> # Now attempt a write into all of the preallocated space -
>> # in a very nasty way, badly fragmenting it and then filling it in.
>> echo "Fill in prealloc space; fragment at offsets:" >> $seqres.full
>> for i in `seq 1 2 1023`; do
>> echo -n "$i " >> $seqres.full
>> - dd if=/dev/zero of=$SCRATCH_MNT/test seek=$i bs=4K count=1
>> conv=notrunc \
>> + dd if=/dev/zero of=$SCRATCH_MNT/test seek=$i bs=$blksz count=1
>> conv=notrunc \
>> >>$seqres.full 2>/dev/null || _fail "failed to write to
>> test file"
>> done
>> _scratch_sync
>> @@ -71,7 +72,7 @@ echo >> $seqres.full
>> echo "Fill in prealloc space; fill holes at offsets:" >> $seqres.full
>> for i in `seq 2 2 1023`; do
>> echo -n "$i " >> $seqres.full
>> - dd if=/dev/zero of=$SCRATCH_MNT/test seek=$i bs=4K count=1
>> conv=notrunc \
>> + dd if=/dev/zero of=$SCRATCH_MNT/test seek=$i bs=$blksz count=1
>> conv=notrunc \
>> >>$seqres.full 2>/dev/null || _fail "failed to fill test file"
>> done
>> _scratch_sync
>
--
Nirjhar Roy
Linux Kernel Developer
IBM, Bangalore
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-12 6:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-29 6:21 [PATCH 0/7] btrfs: Misc test fixes for large block/node sizes Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-07-29 6:21 ` [PATCH 1/7] common/filter: Add a helper function to filter offsets and sizes Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-07-29 6:21 ` [PATCH 2/7] common/btrfs: Add a helper function to get the nodesize Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-07-29 6:21 ` [PATCH 3/7] btrfs/137: Make this compatible with all block sizes Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-08-04 3:58 ` Qu Wenruo
2025-08-05 9:41 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-05 9:44 ` Qu Wenruo
2025-08-05 12:39 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-05 10:47 ` Filipe Manana
2025-08-12 6:23 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-08-12 6:22 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-07-29 6:21 ` [PATCH 4/7] btrfs/200: Make this test scale with the block size Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-07-29 6:53 ` Filipe Manana
2025-08-12 6:26 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-08-04 4:19 ` Qu Wenruo
2025-07-29 6:21 ` [PATCH 5/7] generic/563: Increase the write tolerance to 6% for larger nodesize Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-07-29 7:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-04 7:18 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-07-30 15:06 ` Filipe Manana
2025-08-04 7:18 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-08-04 4:28 ` Qu Wenruo
2025-08-12 6:27 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-07-29 6:21 ` [PATCH 6/7] btrfs/301: Make this test compatible with all block sizes Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-08-04 4:32 ` Qu Wenruo
2025-08-12 6:30 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-07-29 6:21 ` [PATCH 7/7] generic/274: Make the test compatible with all blocksizes Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-08-04 4:35 ` Qu Wenruo
2025-08-12 6:30 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98188746-d549-4d4c-840c-3a7c6379866a@gmail.com \
--to=nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fdmanana@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=zlang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox