From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
Cc: dsterba@suse.cz, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: replace a wrong memset() with memzero_page()
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 12:39:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YkLwAf7SK95iOreD@debian9.Home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ed81efec-0303-d152-a84d-74f4ff4f5058@gmx.com>
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 06:49:10PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2022/3/29 17:57, Filipe Manana wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 08:51:21PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 05:37:59PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > > > The original code is not really setting the memory to 0x00 but 0x01.
> > > >
> > > > To prevent such problem from happening, use memzero_page() instead.
> > >
> > > This should at least mention we think that setting it to 0 is right, as
> > > you call it wrong but give no hint why it's thought to be wrong.
> >
> > My guess is that something different from zero makes it easier to spot
> > the problem in user space, as 0 is not uncommon (holes, prealloced extents)
> > and may get unnoticed by applications/users.
>
> OK, that makes some sense.
>
> But shouldn't user space tool get an -EIO directly?
It should.
But even if applications get -EIO, they may often ignore return values.
It's their fault, but if we can make it less likely that errors are not noticed,
the better. I think we all did often, ignore all or just some return values
from read(), write(), open(), etc.
One recent example is the MariaDB case with io-uring. They were reporting
corruption to the users, but the problem is that didn't properly check
return values, ignoring partial reads and treating them as success:
https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-27900?focusedCommentId=216582&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-216582
The data was fine, not corrupted, they just didn't deal with partial reads
and then read the remaining data when a read returns less data than expected.
>
> As the corrupted range won't have PageUptodate set anyway.
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
> >
> > I don't see a good reason to change this behaviour. Maybe it's just the
> > label name 'zeroit' that makes it confusing. >
> > >
> > > > Since we're here, also make @len const since it's just sectorsize.
> > >
> > > Please don't do that, adding const is fine when the line gets touched
> > > but otherwise adding it to an unrelated fix is not what I want to
> > > encourage.
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-29 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-25 9:37 [PATCH] btrfs: replace a wrong memset() with memzero_page() Qu Wenruo
2022-03-25 10:10 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-03-25 10:49 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-03-25 10:58 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-03-25 16:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-26 1:15 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-04-05 4:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-05 5:08 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-04-05 14:04 ` David Sterba
2022-04-05 13:59 ` David Sterba
2022-03-28 18:51 ` David Sterba
2022-03-28 18:58 ` David Sterba
2022-03-29 9:57 ` Filipe Manana
2022-03-29 10:49 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-03-29 11:39 ` Filipe Manana [this message]
2022-03-29 23:52 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-03-30 9:27 ` Filipe Manana
2022-03-30 10:34 ` Filipe Manana
2022-03-30 10:42 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-03-30 11:02 ` Filipe Manana
2022-03-30 11:03 ` Graham Cobb
2022-03-30 21:34 ` Filipe Manana
2022-03-30 22:29 ` Graham Cobb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YkLwAf7SK95iOreD@debian9.Home \
--to=fdmanana@kernel.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox