public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org>, Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs/254: don't leave mount on test fs in case of failure/interruption
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 09:48:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bffa58e7-e34a-40ec-b0d9-368224dd22ab@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL3q7H6cH26jarU+YEogd5O5FuHi+YNtaWgmsV72NuXacPQU6w@mail.gmail.com>

On 21/2/25 02:22, Filipe Manana wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 5:03 PM Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 01:27:32PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>>> On 20/2/25 02:19, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote:
>>>> From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
>>>>
>>>> If the test fails or is interrupted after mounting $scratch_dev3 inside
>>>> the test filesystem and before unmounting at test_add_device(), we leave
>>>> without being unable to unmount the test filesystem since it has a mount
>>>> inside it. This results in the need to manually unmount $scratch_dev3,
>>>> otherwise a subsequent run of fstests fails since the unmount of the
>>>> test device fails with -EBUSY.
>>>>
>>>> Fix this by unmounting $scratch_dev3 ($seq_mnt) in the _cleanup()
>>>> function.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    tests/btrfs/254 | 1 +
>>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/254 b/tests/btrfs/254
>>>> index d9c9eea9..6523389b 100755
>>>> --- a/tests/btrfs/254
>>>> +++ b/tests/btrfs/254
>>>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ _cleanup()
>>>>    {
>>>>      cd /
>>>>      rm -f $tmp.*
>>>> +   $UMOUNT_PROG $seq_mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
>>
>> This should use the _unmount helper that's in for-next.
> 
> Sure, it does the same, except that it redirects stdout and stderr to
> $seqres.full.
> 
> Some tests are still calling  $UMOUNT_PROG directly. And that's often
> what we want, so that if umount fails we get a mismatch with the
> golden output instead of ignoring the failure.
> But in this case it's fine.
> 
> Anand, since you've already merged this patch into your repo, can you
> please replace that line with the following?
> 
> _unmount $seq_mnt
> 

Applied.
Thanks.

Zorro,

Just checked, and it looks like you haven’t pulled in patches
from my for-next yet.
I went ahead and force-updated it to keep unnecessary noise
off the ML.

If you're pulling this weekend, there are three patches in
for-next ready to merge.

( https://github.com/asj/fstests.git for-next.)


Thanks!
Anand

> Thanks.
> 
>>
>> --D
>>
>>>>      rm -rf $seq_mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
>>>>      cleanup_dmdev
>>>>    }
>>>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
>>>
>>>
>>>


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-21  1:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-19 18:19 [PATCH 0/2] fstests: a couple fixes for btrfs/254 fdmanana
2025-02-19 18:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs/254: don't leave mount on test fs in case of failure/interruption fdmanana
2025-02-20  5:27   ` Anand Jain
2025-02-20 17:03     ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-20 18:22       ` Filipe Manana
2025-02-21  1:48         ` Anand Jain [this message]
2025-02-21  6:09           ` Zorro Lang
2025-02-21  4:18         ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-21  6:02           ` Zorro Lang
2025-02-21 20:22             ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 22:19           ` [PATCH] fstests: finish UMOUNT_PROG to _unmount conversion Dave Chinner
2025-02-26 10:37             ` Filipe Manana
2025-02-26 16:16               ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-26 21:37               ` Dave Chinner
2025-02-19 18:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs/254: fix test failure in case scratch devices are larger than 50G fdmanana
2025-02-20  6:45   ` Anand Jain
2025-02-19 22:13 ` [PATCH 0/2] fstests: a couple fixes for btrfs/254 David Sterba
2025-02-20  6:42 ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bffa58e7-e34a-40ec-b0d9-368224dd22ab@oracle.com \
    --to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zlang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox