public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Cc: fdmanana@kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs/254: don't leave mount on test fs in case of failure/interruption
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 09:03:33 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250220170333.GV21799@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d2d72753-5bf2-48cf-b2f0-cfe184ec75a7@oracle.com>

On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 01:27:32PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> On 20/2/25 02:19, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote:
> > From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
> > 
> > If the test fails or is interrupted after mounting $scratch_dev3 inside
> > the test filesystem and before unmounting at test_add_device(), we leave
> > without being unable to unmount the test filesystem since it has a mount
> > inside it. This results in the need to manually unmount $scratch_dev3,
> > otherwise a subsequent run of fstests fails since the unmount of the
> > test device fails with -EBUSY.
> > 
> > Fix this by unmounting $scratch_dev3 ($seq_mnt) in the _cleanup()
> > function.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
> > ---
> >   tests/btrfs/254 | 1 +
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tests/btrfs/254 b/tests/btrfs/254
> > index d9c9eea9..6523389b 100755
> > --- a/tests/btrfs/254
> > +++ b/tests/btrfs/254
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ _cleanup()
> >   {
> >   	cd /
> >   	rm -f $tmp.*
> > +	$UMOUNT_PROG $seq_mnt > /dev/null 2>&1

This should use the _unmount helper that's in for-next.

--D

> >   	rm -rf $seq_mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
> >   	cleanup_dmdev
> >   }
> 
> 
> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
> 
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-20 17:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-19 18:19 [PATCH 0/2] fstests: a couple fixes for btrfs/254 fdmanana
2025-02-19 18:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs/254: don't leave mount on test fs in case of failure/interruption fdmanana
2025-02-20  5:27   ` Anand Jain
2025-02-20 17:03     ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-02-20 18:22       ` Filipe Manana
2025-02-21  1:48         ` Anand Jain
2025-02-21  6:09           ` Zorro Lang
2025-02-21  4:18         ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-21  6:02           ` Zorro Lang
2025-02-21 20:22             ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 22:19           ` [PATCH] fstests: finish UMOUNT_PROG to _unmount conversion Dave Chinner
2025-02-26 10:37             ` Filipe Manana
2025-02-26 16:16               ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-26 21:37               ` Dave Chinner
2025-02-19 18:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs/254: fix test failure in case scratch devices are larger than 50G fdmanana
2025-02-20  6:45   ` Anand Jain
2025-02-19 22:13 ` [PATCH 0/2] fstests: a couple fixes for btrfs/254 David Sterba
2025-02-20  6:42 ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250220170333.GV21799@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox