From: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/20] btrfs: add fscrypt integration
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2022 20:01:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e8a1a9c4f288f707025fef07537414e1@dorminy.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YxfTYSWgGJsKf4fX@quark>
On 2022-09-06 19:10, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 07:01:15PM -0400, Sweet Tea Dorminy wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/6/22 18:35, Eric Biggers wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 08:35:15PM -0400, Sweet Tea Dorminy wrote:
>> > > This is a changeset adding encryption to btrfs.
>> >
>> > What git tree and commit does this apply to?
>>
>> https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-devel/; branch misc-next. Should apply
>> cleanly to its current tip, 76ccdc004e12312ea056811d530043ff11d050c6 .
>
> Patch 8 wasn't received by linux-fscrypt for some reason, any idea why?
>
> $ b4 am cover.1662420176.git.sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me
> Looking up
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fscrypt/cover.1662420176.git.sweettea-kernel%40dorminy.me
> Grabbing thread from
> lore.kernel.org/linux-fscrypt/cover.1662420176.git.sweettea-kernel%40dorminy.me/t.mbox.gz
> Analyzing 22 messages in the thread
> Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment...
> ---
> [PATCH v2 1/20] fscrypt: expose fscrypt_nokey_name
> [PATCH v2 2/20] fscrypt: add flag allowing partially-encrypted
> directories
> [PATCH v2 3/20] fscrypt: add fscrypt_have_same_policy() to check
> inode compatibility
> [PATCH v2 4/20] fscrypt: allow fscrypt_generate_iv() to distinguish
> filenames
> [PATCH v2 5/20] fscrypt: add extent-based encryption
> [PATCH v2 6/20] fscrypt: document btrfs' fscrypt quirks.
> [PATCH v2 7/20] btrfs: store directory's encryption state
> ERROR: missing [8/20]!
> [PATCH v2 9/20] btrfs: setup fscrypt_names from dentrys using helper
> [PATCH v2 10/20] btrfs: factor a fscrypt_name matching method
> [PATCH v2 11/20] btrfs: disable various operations on encrypted
> inodes
> [PATCH v2 12/20] btrfs: start using fscrypt hooks.
> [PATCH v2 13/20] btrfs: add fscrypt_context items.
> [PATCH v2 14/20] btrfs: translate btrfs encryption flags and
> encrypted inode flag.
> [PATCH v2 15/20] btrfs: store a fscrypt extent context per normal
> file extent
> [PATCH v2 16/20] btrfs: Add new FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FSCRYPT feature
> flag.
> [PATCH v2 17/20] btrfs: reuse encrypted filename hash when possible.
> [PATCH v2 18/20] btrfs: adapt directory read and lookup to
> potentially encrypted filenames
> [PATCH v2 19/20] btrfs: encrypt normal file extent data if
> appropriate
> [PATCH v2 20/20] btrfs: implement fscrypt ioctls
Patch 8 is large and dull, and bounced from linux-fscrypt@ for size, but
b4 gets it for me. b4 -p linux-fscrypt recreates the missing [8/20]; is
it possible that option is set somewhere in your configuration?
$ b4 am -o- cover.1662420176.git.sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me | git am
Looking up
https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1662420176.git.sweettea-kernel%40dorminy.me
Grabbing thread from
lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1662420176.git.sweettea-kernel%40dorminy.me/t.mbox.gz
Analyzing 23 messages in the thread
Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment...
---
✓ [PATCH v2 1/20] fscrypt: expose fscrypt_nokey_name
✓ [PATCH v2 2/20] fscrypt: add flag allowing partially-encrypted
directories
✓ [PATCH v2 3/20] fscrypt: add fscrypt_have_same_policy() to check
inode compatibility
✓ [PATCH v2 4/20] fscrypt: allow fscrypt_generate_iv() to distinguish
filenames
✓ [PATCH v2 5/20] fscrypt: add extent-based encryption
✓ [PATCH v2 6/20] fscrypt: document btrfs' fscrypt quirks.
✓ [PATCH v2 7/20] btrfs: store directory's encryption state
✓ [PATCH v2 8/20] btrfs: use fscrypt_names instead of name/len
everywhere.
✓ [PATCH v2 9/20] btrfs: setup fscrypt_names from dentrys using helper
✓ [PATCH v2 10/20] btrfs: factor a fscrypt_name matching method
✓ [PATCH v2 11/20] btrfs: disable various operations on encrypted
inodes
+ Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> (✓ DKIM/intel.com)
✓ [PATCH v2 12/20] btrfs: start using fscrypt hooks.
✓ [PATCH v2 13/20] btrfs: add fscrypt_context items.
✓ [PATCH v2 14/20] btrfs: translate btrfs encryption flags and
encrypted inode flag.
✓ [PATCH v2 15/20] btrfs: store a fscrypt extent context per normal
file extent
✓ [PATCH v2 16/20] btrfs: Add new FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FSCRYPT feature
flag.
✓ [PATCH v2 17/20] btrfs: reuse encrypted filename hash when possible.
✓ [PATCH v2 18/20] btrfs: adapt directory read and lookup to
potentially encrypted filenames
✓ [PATCH v2 19/20] btrfs: encrypt normal file extent data if
appropriate
✓ [PATCH v2 20/20] btrfs: implement fscrypt ioctls
---
✓ Signed: DKIM/dorminy.me
---
Total patches: 20
---
Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1662420176.git.sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-07 0:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-06 0:35 [PATCH v2 00/20] btrfs: add fscrypt integration Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-09-06 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 01/20] fscrypt: expose fscrypt_nokey_name Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-09-08 13:41 ` Josef Bacik
2022-09-06 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 02/20] fscrypt: add flag allowing partially-encrypted directories Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-09-08 13:43 ` Josef Bacik
2022-09-12 1:42 ` Eric Biggers
2022-09-15 18:58 ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-09-13 10:07 ` Anand Jain
2022-09-13 11:02 ` Neal Gompa
2022-09-06 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 03/20] fscrypt: add fscrypt_have_same_policy() to check inode compatibility Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-09-08 13:53 ` Josef Bacik
2022-09-06 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 04/20] fscrypt: allow fscrypt_generate_iv() to distinguish filenames Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-09-08 14:01 ` Josef Bacik
2022-09-06 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 05/20] fscrypt: add extent-based encryption Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-09-07 19:59 ` Omar Sandoval
2022-09-08 15:33 ` Josef Bacik
2022-09-10 18:53 ` kernel test robot
2022-09-12 1:34 ` Eric Biggers
2022-09-06 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 06/20] fscrypt: document btrfs' fscrypt quirks Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-09-08 15:34 ` Josef Bacik
2022-09-06 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 07/20] btrfs: store directory's encryption state Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-09-08 15:37 ` Josef Bacik
2022-09-06 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 08/20] btrfs: use fscrypt_names instead of name/len everywhere Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-09-07 20:04 ` David Sterba
2022-09-06 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 09/20] btrfs: setup fscrypt_names from dentrys using helper Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-09-08 19:11 ` Josef Bacik
2022-09-06 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 10/20] btrfs: factor a fscrypt_name matching method Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-09-08 19:27 ` Josef Bacik
2022-09-09 10:15 ` David Sterba
2022-09-09 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-09 13:34 ` David Sterba
2022-09-16 22:18 ` J Lovejoy
2022-09-19 2:00 ` Bradley M. Kuhn
2022-09-19 17:20 ` David Sterba
2022-09-19 16:52 ` David Sterba
2022-09-09 13:41 ` Chris Mason
2022-09-06 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 11/20] btrfs: disable various operations on encrypted inodes Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-09-06 6:36 ` kernel test robot
2022-09-07 20:11 ` David Sterba
2022-09-06 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 12/20] btrfs: start using fscrypt hooks Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-09-07 20:17 ` David Sterba
2022-09-07 20:42 ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-09-12 1:50 ` Eric Biggers
2022-09-08 19:42 ` Josef Bacik
2022-09-06 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 13/20] btrfs: add fscrypt_context items Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-09-07 20:43 ` David Sterba
2022-09-08 20:06 ` Josef Bacik
2022-09-06 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 14/20] btrfs: translate btrfs encryption flags and encrypted inode flag Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-09-08 20:07 ` Josef Bacik
2022-09-06 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 15/20] btrfs: store a fscrypt extent context per normal file extent Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-09-07 21:10 ` David Sterba
2022-09-07 21:39 ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-09-09 10:04 ` David Sterba
2022-09-06 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 16/20] btrfs: Add new FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FSCRYPT feature flag Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-09-09 11:35 ` David Sterba
2022-09-12 1:36 ` Eric Biggers
2022-09-06 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 17/20] btrfs: reuse encrypted filename hash when possible Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-09-07 21:24 ` David Sterba
2022-09-06 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 18/20] btrfs: adapt directory read and lookup to potentially encrypted filenames Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-09-08 20:15 ` Josef Bacik
2022-09-06 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 19/20] btrfs: encrypt normal file extent data if appropriate Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-09-08 20:19 ` Josef Bacik
2022-09-06 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 20/20] btrfs: implement fscrypt ioctls Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-09-07 21:33 ` David Sterba
2022-09-06 22:35 ` [PATCH v2 00/20] btrfs: add fscrypt integration Eric Biggers
2022-09-06 23:01 ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-09-06 23:10 ` Eric Biggers
2022-09-07 0:01 ` Sweet Tea Dorminy [this message]
2022-09-07 19:38 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e8a1a9c4f288f707025fef07537414e1@dorminy.me \
--to=sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox