From: Torin Cooper-Bennun <torin@maxiluxsystems.com>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH can-next 2/5] can: m_can: m_can_isr(): handle device-specific interrupts
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 09:23:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210601082338.b7t67oebywhcwcnd@bigthink> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210526151833.5ppprex6zzrclr6u@pengutronix.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2027 bytes --]
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 05:18:33PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 26.05.2021 17:07:05, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > On 26.05.2021 13:47:44, Torin Cooper-Bennun wrote:
> > > + if (!ir) {
> > > + /* Handle device-specific interrupts */
> > > + if (cdev->ops->handle_dev_interrupts)
> > > + irq_ret = cdev->ops->handle_dev_interrupts(cdev, false);
> > > + return irq_ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* ACK M_CAN interrupts */
> > > + m_can_write(cdev, M_CAN_IR, ir);
> > >
> > > + /* ACK device-specific interrupts */
> > > if (cdev->ops->handle_dev_interrupts)
> > > cdev->ops->handle_dev_interrupts(cdev, true);
> >
> > Why do you call a 2nd time the handle_dev_interrupts() callback?
>
> I see, clear and no clear. Why are these two separate operations?
As discussed here,
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20210514141012.3ehw4tosog3lreq4@pengutronix.de/
you previously recommended adding a 2nd parameter the callback to
indicate that we only want to clear the device IR, not read it, in order
to save an SPI transaction when M_CAN core interrupts were already
handled.
However, quoting from your previous mail,
> On 26.05.2021 13:47:44, Torin Cooper-Bennun wrote:
> > Device-specific interrupts are handled, if no M_CAN core interrupts were
> > handled in the ISR call.
>
> In case there are both core and device specific interrupts the kernel
> IRQ handler will call the ISR a 2nd time - should be OK.
this implies I should leave device IR totally alone unless no M_CAN
interrupts are asserted, and do the following only:
| ir = m_can_read(cdev, M_CAN_IR);
|
| if (!ir) {
| /* Handle device-specific interrupts */
| if (cdev->ops->handle_dev_interrupts)
| irq_ret = cdev->ops->handle_dev_interrupts(cdev, false);
| return irq_ret;
| }
|
| /* ACK M_CAN interrupts */
| m_can_write(cdev, M_CAN_IR, ir);
I can probably also kill off the clear_only parameter.
--
Regards,
Torin Cooper-Bennun
Software Engineer | maxiluxsystems.com
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-01 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-26 12:47 [PATCH can-next 0/5] m_can, tcan4x5x: device-specific interrupt handling Torin Cooper-Bennun
2021-05-26 12:47 ` [PATCH can-next 1/5] can: m_can: ops: clear_interrupts -> handle_dev_interrupts Torin Cooper-Bennun
2021-05-26 12:47 ` [PATCH can-next 2/5] can: m_can: m_can_isr(): handle device-specific interrupts Torin Cooper-Bennun
2021-05-26 15:07 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2021-05-26 15:18 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2021-06-01 8:23 ` Torin Cooper-Bennun [this message]
2021-06-01 10:25 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2021-06-01 7:22 ` Torin Cooper-Bennun
2021-05-26 12:47 ` [PATCH can-next 3/5] can: tcan4x5x: tcan4x5x_clear_interrupts(): rm unnecessary reg clears Torin Cooper-Bennun
2021-05-26 12:47 ` [PATCH can-next 4/5] can: tcan4x5x: only enable useful device interrupts Torin Cooper-Bennun
2021-05-26 12:47 ` [PATCH can-next 5/5] can: tcan4x5x: implement handling of " Torin Cooper-Bennun
2021-05-26 15:15 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2021-06-01 7:50 ` Torin Cooper-Bennun
2021-06-01 8:19 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2021-05-26 15:20 ` [PATCH can-next 0/5] m_can, tcan4x5x: device-specific interrupt handling Marc Kleine-Budde
2021-06-01 8:21 ` Torin Cooper-Bennun
2021-06-01 9:18 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2021-06-01 10:56 ` Torin Cooper-Bennun
2021-07-02 7:33 ` Torin Cooper-Bennun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210601082338.b7t67oebywhcwcnd@bigthink \
--to=torin@maxiluxsystems.com \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox