From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com>,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cifs: Fix reacquisition of volume cookie on still-live connection
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:41:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <188149.1713361310@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14e66691a65e3d05d3d8d50e74dfb366@manguebit.com>
Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com> wrote:
> > [!] Note: Looking at cifs_mount_get_tcon(), a more general solution may
> > actually be required. Reacquiring the volume cookie isn't the only thing
> > that function does: it also partially reinitialises the tcon record without
> > any locking - which may cause live filesystem ops already using the tcon
> > through a previous mount to malfunction.
>
> Agreed.
Looking over the code again, I'm not sure whether is actually necessary - or
whether it is necessary and will be a bit nasty to implement as it will
require read locking also.
Firstly, reset_cifs_unix_caps() seems to re-set tcon->fsUnixInfo.Capability
and tcon->unix_ext, which it would presumably set to the same things - which
is probably fine.
However, cifs_qfs_tcon() makes RPC operations that reloads tcon->fsDevInfo and
tcon->fsAttrInfo - both of which may be being accessed without locks.
smb2_qfs_tcon() and smb3_qfs_tcon() alters everything cifs_qfs_tcon() does,
plus a bunch of extra tcon members. Can this locally cached information
change over time on the server whilst we have a connection to it?
David
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-17 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-04 15:21 [PATCH] cifs: Fix reacquisition of volume cookie on still-live connection David Howells
2024-04-04 16:07 ` Paulo Alcantara
2024-04-16 16:58 ` David Howells
2024-04-17 14:09 ` Paulo Alcantara
2024-04-17 14:38 ` David Howells
2024-04-17 18:59 ` Tom Talpey
2024-04-18 13:32 ` David Howells
2024-04-17 21:25 ` Paulo Alcantara
2024-04-18 13:43 ` David Howells
2024-04-19 20:04 ` Paulo Alcantara
2024-04-17 13:41 ` David Howells [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=188149.1713361310@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pc@manguebit.com \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
--cc=sprasad@microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox