From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com>,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cifs: Fix reacquisition of volume cookie on still-live connection
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 14:43:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <564520.1713447839@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59c322dc49c3cc76a4b6a2de35106c61@manguebit.com>
Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com> wrote:
> I don't know why it was designed that way, but the reason we have two
> different superblocks with ${opts} being the same is because cifs.ko
> relies on the value of cifs_sb_info::prepath to build paths out of
> dentries. See build_path_from_dentry(). So, when you access
> /mnt/2/foo, cifs.ko will build a path like '[optional tree name prefix]
> + cifs_sb_info::prepath + \foo' and then reuse connections
> (server+session+tcon) from first superblock to perform I/O on that file.
Yep. You don't *need* prepath. You could always build from the sb->s_root
without a prepath and have mnt->mnt_root offset the place the VFS thinks you
are:
[rootdir]/ <--- s_root points here
|
v
foo/
|
v
bar/ <--- mnt_root points here
|
v
a
Without prepath, you build back up the tree { a, bar/, foo/, [rootdir] } with
prepath you insert the prepath at the end.
Bind mounts just make the VFS think it's starting midway down, but you build
up back to s_root.
Think of a mount as just referring to a subtree of the tree inside the
superblock. The prepath is just an optimisation - but possibly one that makes
sense for cifs if you're having to do pathname fabrication a lot.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-18 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-04 15:21 [PATCH] cifs: Fix reacquisition of volume cookie on still-live connection David Howells
2024-04-04 16:07 ` Paulo Alcantara
2024-04-16 16:58 ` David Howells
2024-04-17 14:09 ` Paulo Alcantara
2024-04-17 14:38 ` David Howells
2024-04-17 18:59 ` Tom Talpey
2024-04-18 13:32 ` David Howells
2024-04-17 21:25 ` Paulo Alcantara
2024-04-18 13:43 ` David Howells [this message]
2024-04-19 20:04 ` Paulo Alcantara
2024-04-17 13:41 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=564520.1713447839@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pc@manguebit.com \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
--cc=sprasad@microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox