From: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com>,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cifs: Fix reacquisition of volume cookie on still-live connection
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 18:25:19 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59c322dc49c3cc76a4b6a2de35106c61@manguebit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <277920.1713364693@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> writes:
> Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com> wrote:
>
>> Consider the following example where a tcon is reused from different
>> CIFS superblocks:
>>
>> mount.cifs //srv/share /mnt/1 -o ${opts} # new super, new tcon
>> mount.cifs //srv/share/dir /mnt/2 -o ${opts} # new super, reused tcon
>>
>> So, /mnt/1/dir/foo and /mnt/2/foo will lead to different inodes.
>>
>> The two mounts are accessing the same tcon (\\srv\share) but the new
>> superblock was created because the prefix path "\dir" didn't match in
>> cifs_match_super(). Trust me, that's a very common scenario.
>
> Why does it need to lead to a different superblock, assuming ${opts} is the
> same in both cases? Can we not do as NFS does and share the superblock,
> walking during the mount process through the directory prefix to the root
> object?
I don't know why it was designed that way, but the reason we have two
different superblocks with ${opts} being the same is because cifs.ko
relies on the value of cifs_sb_info::prepath to build paths out of
dentries. See build_path_from_dentry(). So, when you access
/mnt/2/foo, cifs.ko will build a path like '[optional tree name prefix]
+ cifs_sb_info::prepath + \foo' and then reuse connections
(server+session+tcon) from first superblock to perform I/O on that file.
> In other words, why does:
>
> mount.cifs //srv/share /mnt/1 -o ${opts}
> mount.cifs //srv/share/dir /mnt/2 -o ${opts}
>
> give you a different result to:
>
> mount.cifs //srv/share /mnt/1 -o ${opts}
> mount --bind /mnt/1/dir /mnt/2
Honestly, I don't know how bind works at VFS level. I see that the new
superblock isn't created and when I access /mnt/2/foo,
build_path_from_dentry() correctly returns '\dir\foo'.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-17 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-04 15:21 [PATCH] cifs: Fix reacquisition of volume cookie on still-live connection David Howells
2024-04-04 16:07 ` Paulo Alcantara
2024-04-16 16:58 ` David Howells
2024-04-17 14:09 ` Paulo Alcantara
2024-04-17 14:38 ` David Howells
2024-04-17 18:59 ` Tom Talpey
2024-04-18 13:32 ` David Howells
2024-04-17 21:25 ` Paulo Alcantara [this message]
2024-04-18 13:43 ` David Howells
2024-04-19 20:04 ` Paulo Alcantara
2024-04-17 13:41 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59c322dc49c3cc76a4b6a2de35106c61@manguebit.com \
--to=pc@manguebit.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
--cc=sprasad@microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox