From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
CIFS <linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>,
samba-technical <samba-technical@lists.samba.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cifs: remove unused status severity defines
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 16:08:56 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190314070856.GA1200@jagdpanzerIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH2r5msYG4H19GK1Fmnqb1dNCcp2qahULc_t4v9qdJ=OOZmGXg@mail.gmail.com>
On (03/14/19 01:54), Steve French wrote:
> Since this file (smb2status.h) is intended to track the official
> protocol documentation (albeit smb2status.h probably needs to be
> updated), in this case the protocol document MS-ERREF. I would prefer
> to keep it closer to MS-ERREF and leave definitions in even if unused
> (if nothing else it helps some of us when debugging to recognize what
> these errors on the wire mean). There is a real danger that we have
> run into in the past that in removing some protocol definitions
> (flags, etc.) from the code or forgetting to update our headers to
> match newer versions of the protocol specifications, that with future
> code changes we can forget to handle flags (for example) or misparse
> responses due to not realizing that there are additional flags that
> need to be parsed.
OK, works for me.
-ss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-14 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-14 6:17 [PATCH 1/2] cifs: remove unused status severity defines Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-14 6:54 ` Steve French
2019-03-14 7:04 ` Steve French
2019-03-14 7:12 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-14 7:19 ` Steve French
2019-03-14 7:39 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-14 8:03 ` Steve French
2019-03-14 7:08 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
[not found] ` <20190314061716.19892-2-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
2019-03-15 12:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] cifs: don't use __constant_cpu_to_le32() David Laight
2019-03-15 14:29 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190314070856.GA1200@jagdpanzerIV \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
--cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox