* [PATCH v2 2/3] cifs: warn about deprecation of /proc/fs/cifs/OplockEnabled interface
@ 2011-10-12 6:21 Suresh Jayaraman
[not found] ` <4E953201.9060606-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Suresh Jayaraman @ 2011-10-12 6:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steve French; +Cc: linux-cifs, Jeff Layton, Alexander Swen
The plan is to deprecate this interface by kernel version 3.4.
Changes since v1
- add a '\n' to the printk.
Reported-by: Alexander Swen <alex-UE4+9DRHXtc@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
---
fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c b/fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c
index 2fe3cf1..831fe13 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c
@@ -526,6 +526,9 @@ static ssize_t cifs_oplock_proc_write(struct file *file,
char c;
int rc;
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "CIFS: The /proc/fs/cifs/OplockEnabled interface "
+ "will be removed in kernel version 3.4. Please migrate to "
+ "using the 'enable_oplocks' module parameter in cifs.ko.\n");
rc = get_user(c, buffer);
if (rc)
return rc;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread[parent not found: <4E953201.9060606-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] cifs: warn about deprecation of /proc/fs/cifs/OplockEnabled interface [not found] ` <4E953201.9060606-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org> @ 2011-10-12 22:44 ` Steve French [not found] ` <CAH2r5mub6MNsq84pCHb048KQJs8QQucUWARropbQ8nh5DgL=uQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Steve French @ 2011-10-12 22:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Suresh Jayaraman; +Cc: linux-cifs, Jeff Layton, Alexander Swen Shouldn't we note /sys/module/cifs/parameters/echo_retries in the message and the readme (since changing at runtime, e.g. to work around a server bug temporarily, is probably more common that at module install time). I will probably make a minor update to the readme to note this if it is not in the patch, but not sure about the printk. On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org> wrote: > The plan is to deprecate this interface by kernel version 3.4. > > Changes since v1 > - add a '\n' to the printk. > > Reported-by: Alexander Swen <alex-UE4+9DRHXtc@public.gmane.org> > Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > Signed-off-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org> > --- > fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c | 3 +++ > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c b/fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c > index 2fe3cf1..831fe13 100644 > --- a/fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c > +++ b/fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c > @@ -526,6 +526,9 @@ static ssize_t cifs_oplock_proc_write(struct file *file, > char c; > int rc; > > + printk(KERN_WARNING "CIFS: The /proc/fs/cifs/OplockEnabled interface " > + "will be removed in kernel version 3.4. Please migrate to " > + "using the 'enable_oplocks' module parameter in cifs.ko.\n"); > rc = get_user(c, buffer); > if (rc) > return rc; > -- Thanks, Steve ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CAH2r5mub6MNsq84pCHb048KQJs8QQucUWARropbQ8nh5DgL=uQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] cifs: warn about deprecation of /proc/fs/cifs/OplockEnabled interface [not found] ` <CAH2r5mub6MNsq84pCHb048KQJs8QQucUWARropbQ8nh5DgL=uQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2011-10-12 22:52 ` Steve French [not found] ` <CAH2r5ms5QbKiwTzjTbNBrQgpe=E68jd6xhoNJ32kCdvp7UK+Kw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Steve French @ 2011-10-12 22:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Suresh Jayaraman; +Cc: linux-cifs, Jeff Layton, Alexander Swen Minor clarification - the readme mentions /proc/module/cifs/parameters/<param> i.e. echo "value" > /proc/module/cifs/parameters/<param> but in my system they are under /sys/module/.... not /proc/module/.... On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Steve French <smfrench-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > Shouldn't we note /sys/module/cifs/parameters/echo_retries in the > message and the readme (since changing at runtime, e.g. to work around > a server bug temporarily, is probably more common that at module > install time). I will probably make a minor update to the readme to > note this if it is not in the patch, but not sure about the printk. > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman-WDPRK7U/wSs@public.gmane.orgm> wrote: >> The plan is to deprecate this interface by kernel version 3.4. >> >> Changes since v1 >> - add a '\n' to the printk. >> >> Reported-by: Alexander Swen <alex-UE4+9DRHXtc@public.gmane.org> >> Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> >> Signed-off-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org> >> --- >> fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c | 3 +++ >> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c b/fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c >> index 2fe3cf1..831fe13 100644 >> --- a/fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c >> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c >> @@ -526,6 +526,9 @@ static ssize_t cifs_oplock_proc_write(struct file *file, >> char c; >> int rc; >> >> + printk(KERN_WARNING "CIFS: The /proc/fs/cifs/OplockEnabled interface " >> + "will be removed in kernel version 3.4. Please migrate to " >> + "using the 'enable_oplocks' module parameter in cifs.ko.\n"); >> rc = get_user(c, buffer); >> if (rc) >> return rc; >> > > > > -- > Thanks, > > Steve > -- Thanks, Steve ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CAH2r5ms5QbKiwTzjTbNBrQgpe=E68jd6xhoNJ32kCdvp7UK+Kw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] cifs: warn about deprecation of /proc/fs/cifs/OplockEnabled interface [not found] ` <CAH2r5ms5QbKiwTzjTbNBrQgpe=E68jd6xhoNJ32kCdvp7UK+Kw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2011-10-13 4:48 ` Suresh Jayaraman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Suresh Jayaraman @ 2011-10-13 4:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Steve French; +Cc: linux-cifs, Jeff Layton, Alexander Swen On 10/13/2011 04:22 AM, Steve French wrote: > Minor clarification - the readme mentions > > /proc/module/cifs/parameters/<param> > > i.e. echo "value" > /proc/module/cifs/parameters/<param> > > but in my system they are under /sys/module/.... not /proc/module/.... Sorry about this.. It is meant to be /sys/module/.. only. It was a typo. Thanks for fixing it. -Suresh ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-10-13 4:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-10-12 6:21 [PATCH v2 2/3] cifs: warn about deprecation of /proc/fs/cifs/OplockEnabled interface Suresh Jayaraman
[not found] ` <4E953201.9060606-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
2011-10-12 22:44 ` Steve French
[not found] ` <CAH2r5mub6MNsq84pCHb048KQJs8QQucUWARropbQ8nh5DgL=uQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2011-10-12 22:52 ` Steve French
[not found] ` <CAH2r5ms5QbKiwTzjTbNBrQgpe=E68jd6xhoNJ32kCdvp7UK+Kw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2011-10-13 4:48 ` Suresh Jayaraman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox