* re: clk: change clk_ops' ->determine_rate() prototype
@ 2015-07-10 8:26 Dan Carpenter
2015-07-13 22:41 ` Stephen Boyd
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2015-07-10 8:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: boris.brezillon; +Cc: linux-clk
Hello Boris Brezillon,
This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings.
The patch 4a7c639697ef: "clk: change clk_ops' ->determine_rate()
prototype" from Jul 7, 2015, leads to the following Smatch complaint:
drivers/clk/clk.c:458 clk_mux_determine_rate_flags()
error: we previously assumed 'parent' could be null (see line 452)
drivers/clk/clk.c
451 if (core->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT) {
452 ret = __clk_determine_rate(parent ? parent->hw : NULL,
^^^^^^
Check for NULL.
453 &parent_req);
454 if (ret)
455 return ret;
456
457 best = parent_req.rate;
458 req->best_parent_hw = parent->hw;
^^^^^^^^^^
Patch adds unchecked dereference.
459 req->best_parent_rate = best;
460 } else if (parent) {
regards,
dan carpenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: clk: change clk_ops' ->determine_rate() prototype
2015-07-10 8:26 clk: change clk_ops' ->determine_rate() prototype Dan Carpenter
@ 2015-07-13 22:41 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-14 10:45 ` Boris Brezillon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2015-07-13 22:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Carpenter, boris.brezillon; +Cc: linux-clk
On 07/10/2015 01:26 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hello Boris Brezillon,
>
> This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings.
>
> The patch 4a7c639697ef: "clk: change clk_ops' ->determine_rate()
> prototype" from Jul 7, 2015, leads to the following Smatch complaint:
>
> drivers/clk/clk.c:458 clk_mux_determine_rate_flags()
> error: we previously assumed 'parent' could be null (see line 452)
>
> drivers/clk/clk.c
> 451 if (core->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT) {
> 452 ret = __clk_determine_rate(parent ? parent->hw : NULL,
> ^^^^^^
> Check for NULL.
>
> 453 &parent_req);
> 454 if (ret)
> 455 return ret;
> 456
> 457 best = parent_req.rate;
> 458 req->best_parent_hw = parent->hw;
> ^^^^^^^^^^
> Patch adds unchecked dereference.
>
> 459 req->best_parent_rate = best;
> 460 } else if (parent) {
>
>
Thanks Dan.
Boris,
It looks like the transformation here isn't equivalent. If parent is
NULL here and we don't crash, parent_req->rate == req->rate and before
this patch req->rate would be 0 instead. How about this patch squashed
in? It includes some of the removals of best_parent_* assignments that
you had in your follow-up patch, because those make it equivalent to the
previous code.
------8<----
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index c182d8a7924e..244a6535c69c 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -455,16 +455,10 @@ clk_mux_determine_rate_flags(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req,
return ret;
best = parent_req.rate;
- req->best_parent_hw = parent->hw;
- req->best_parent_rate = best;
} else if (parent) {
best = clk_core_get_rate_nolock(parent);
- req->best_parent_hw = parent->hw;
- req->best_parent_rate = best;
} else {
best = clk_core_get_rate_nolock(core);
- req->best_parent_hw = NULL;
- req->best_parent_rate = 0;
}
goto out;
@@ -810,8 +804,10 @@ static int clk_core_round_rate_nolock(struct clk_core *core,
*/
int __clk_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req)
{
- if (!hw)
+ if (!hw) {
+ req->rate = 0;
return 0;
+ }
return clk_core_round_rate_nolock(hw->core, req);
}
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: clk: change clk_ops' ->determine_rate() prototype
2015-07-13 22:41 ` Stephen Boyd
@ 2015-07-14 10:45 ` Boris Brezillon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2015-07-14 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Boyd, Dan Carpenter; +Cc: linux-clk
Dan, Stephen,
Sorry for the late reply, I was away for a couple of days.
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:41:15 -0700
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 07/10/2015 01:26 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > Hello Boris Brezillon,
> >
> > This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings.
> >
> > The patch 4a7c639697ef: "clk: change clk_ops' ->determine_rate()
> > prototype" from Jul 7, 2015, leads to the following Smatch complaint:
> >
> > drivers/clk/clk.c:458 clk_mux_determine_rate_flags()
> > error: we previously assumed 'parent' could be null (see line 452)
> >
> > drivers/clk/clk.c
> > 451 if (core->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT) {
> > 452 ret = __clk_determine_rate(parent ? parent->hw : NULL,
> > ^^^^^^
> > Check for NULL.
> >
> > 453 &parent_req);
> > 454 if (ret)
> > 455 return ret;
> > 456
> > 457 best = parent_req.rate;
> > 458 req->best_parent_hw = parent->hw;
> > ^^^^^^^^^^
> > Patch adds unchecked dereference.
Yes, you're absolutely right.
> >
> > 459 req->best_parent_rate = best;
> > 460 } else if (parent) {
> >
> >
>
> Thanks Dan.
>
> Boris,
>
> It looks like the transformation here isn't equivalent. If parent is
> NULL here and we don't crash, parent_req->rate == req->rate and before
> this patch req->rate would be 0 instead. How about this patch squashed
> in? It includes some of the removals of best_parent_* assignments that
> you had in your follow-up patch, because those make it equivalent to the
> previous code.
And yes, I noticed some instructions were useless while reworking the
determine_rate implementation to return error codes instead of 0, and
the patch you're proposing here looks good to me. Feel free to squash it
with the previous one.
Thanks to both of you.
Best Regards,
Boris
>
> ------8<----
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index c182d8a7924e..244a6535c69c 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -455,16 +455,10 @@ clk_mux_determine_rate_flags(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req,
> return ret;
>
> best = parent_req.rate;
> - req->best_parent_hw = parent->hw;
> - req->best_parent_rate = best;
> } else if (parent) {
> best = clk_core_get_rate_nolock(parent);
> - req->best_parent_hw = parent->hw;
> - req->best_parent_rate = best;
> } else {
> best = clk_core_get_rate_nolock(core);
> - req->best_parent_hw = NULL;
> - req->best_parent_rate = 0;
> }
>
> goto out;
> @@ -810,8 +804,10 @@ static int clk_core_round_rate_nolock(struct clk_core *core,
> */
> int __clk_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req)
> {
> - if (!hw)
> + if (!hw) {
> + req->rate = 0;
> return 0;
> + }
>
> return clk_core_round_rate_nolock(hw->core, req);
> }
>
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-07-14 10:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-07-10 8:26 clk: change clk_ops' ->determine_rate() prototype Dan Carpenter
2015-07-13 22:41 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-14 10:45 ` Boris Brezillon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox